Brian J Smith

Background Studies investigating adverse events have traditionally been principally undertaken from a medical perspective. The impact that experience of an adverse event has on consumer confidence in health care is largely unknown. The objectives of the study were to seek public opinion on 1) the rate and severity of adverse events experienced in hospitals; and 2) the perception of safety in hospitals, so that predictors of lack of safety could be identified. Methods A multistage, clustered survey of persons residing in South Australia (2001), using household interviews (weighted n = 2,884). Results A total of 67% of respondents aged over forty years reported having at least one member of their household hospitalised in the past five years; with the average being two hospital admissions in five years. Respondents stated that 7.0% (95%CI: 6.2% to 7.9%) of those hospital admissions were associated with an adverse event; 59.7% of respondents (95% CI: 51.4% to 67.5%) rated the adverse event as really serious and 48.5% (95% CI: 40.4% to 56.8%) stated prolonged hospitalisation was required as a consequence of the adverse event. Perception of safety in hospitals was largely affected by the experience of an adverse event; really serious events were the most significant predictor of lack of safety in those aged 40 years and over (RR 2.38; p<0.001). Conclusion The experience of adverse events negatively impacted on public confidence in hospitals. The consumer-reported adverse event rate in hospitals (7.0%) is similar to that identified using medical record review. Based on estimates from other studies, self-reported claims of adverse events in hospital by consumers appear credible, and should be considered when developing appropriate treatment regimes.

Objectives: To evaluate 1) barriers to clinical guideline use and 2) the relationship between guideline use and inpatient outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: 1) Four focus groups of specific health professions (n=30), from three metropolitan hospitals, and interview of 99 medical officers (MOs), linked to 349 admissions, both guided by behavioural modelling theory; 2) association between guideline use and patient outcomes (length of hospital stay ≥ 14 days, and readmission within 28 or 90 days) was evaluated in a cohort of 405 COPD patients. Results: 1) In focus groups, nurses and allied health professionals emphasized facilitation issues including paperwork duplication and time limitations as barriers, but considered improved patient care outcomes as the major guideline use determinant. There were similar findings in junior MOs (nonconsultants) by both focus group and interview, with the addition of a need for a sense of ownership. Senior MOs (consultants) greatly emphasized sense of ownership. Barriers to guideline use varied between types of units. Behavioural modelling explained 49% of the variation in intention to use the guideline for MOs. For nonconsultants, habit and intention were significantly associated with extent of guideline use. 2) Patient outcomes: guideline use was not associated with length of stay or readmission. Conclusions: 1) Guideline implementation should address issues relevant to different health professions, units and seniority of profession. 2) Guideline use was not associated with reductions in readmission or length of stay.

We tested associations between risk factors and bone mineral density in airways disease subjects, and developed a clinical screening tool to identify people who could benefit from bone mineral density testing. Subjects were recruited through hospital outpatients and pharmacies (Newcastle, n = 172). With survey refinement, we then tested a revised tool in a second sample (Adelaide, n = 317). Study factors included oral/inhaled corticosteroid use, asthma severity, respiratory admissions, physical activity, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEVI), body mass index, and smoking history. Outcomes were bone mineral density of lumbar vertebra (L2–4) and total (or neck of) femur. Analysis was logistic regression with generation of a simple screening algorithm based upon coefficients. Scoring algorithm risk factors for T–score of – 2.0: age 68 = 10 points, bone mineral density <20 = 25, weight 80 cigarette pack years = 15, low–level leisure activity = 5, area under receiver operator curve 0.83. For a cut–off score of 10, sensitivity was 91.2%, specificity 53.9%, positive and negative predictive values 52.3 and 91.7%, and 67.2% were correctly classified. In conclusions, our model has acceptable sensitivity, although limited specificity. Use of this tool may reduce unnecessary referrals for bone mineral density measurement.

Background:Patients with airways disease have been demonstrated to be at risk of osteoporosis, and this is likely to be multifactorial. Our aim was to identify patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) using a screening program, and then evaluate the benefit of daily alendronate. Method:Subjects with hip or lumbar spine baseline T-scores <-2.5, or Z-score <-1.0 commenced on alendronate/calcium (10 mg/600 mg day) or placebo/calcium, in a double blind randomized controlled trial. BMD by dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (lumbar vertebrae 2-4, neck of femur, total femur) was repeated after 12 months, with adverse events recorded. Results: 145 subjects (74 male, 71 female, mean age 67, median FEV, 1.0 litres = 43% of predicted) were enrolled; 66 alendronate/calcium, 79 placebo/calcium with 24 and 26 withdrawals, respectively. Per protocol but not intention to treat analysis of covariance demonstrated statistically significant improvements in T and Z scores for lumbar spine bone mineral density (P = 0.035, P = 0.040), with no improvement demonstrated at the hip. Conclusions:Improvement in bone mineral density has been demonstrated at the lumbar spine, but not hip, by per protocol analysis, with daily alendronate, at 12 months.

Aims: Benefits of long acting beta 2 agonists are unclear for severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with poor response to short acting bronchodilators. We aimed to evaluate 1) effects of eformoterol in such patients using a ‘n-of-1’ double crossover study design, and 2) aggregate data as a double-blind, double crossover randomized control trial. Methods: Subjects with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) < 60% predicted, and poor response to short acting bronchodilators were studied six times over 18 weeks. During that time they were prescribed four weeks of either eformoterol or placebo, followed by the alternate, and then a second crossover. Four-weekly measures included six minute walk distance (6MWD), FEV₁, previous two weeks of symptoms, and chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ) including treatment goal items. Results: Of 27 original subjects (21 male, mean age of 70 years, five smokers, mean prebronchodilator FEV₁, 36% predicted), one subject had clinically significant concordant improvement in the CRQ dyspnoea domain and 6MWD (by 51 metres), but not for other outcomes. There were no concordant improvements in any other subjects. Aggregate double crossover data analysis demonstrated no improvement in any outcome measures. Conclusions: The ‘n-of-1’ study design and aggregate data analysis demonstrated lack of benefit from eformoterol in COPD patients with poor response to short acting bronchodilators.

Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition associated with considerable morbidity, mortality and hospital admissions. However, published COPD management guidelines have major limitations and lack practical summaries. We aimed to optimally develop, implement, and evaluate a multidisciplinary COPD inpatient management ‘ACCORD’ guideline, including prompts for comprehensive day one assessments through to a discharge criteria checklist. Method: Two intervention and two control public teaching hospitals in Adelaide, South Australia, took part, with pre-intervention (721 COPD admissions over 7 months) and intervention phases (509 COPD admissions over 7 months). During the intervention stage the ACCORD guideline was placed in the case notes on the day of admission or soon after. Readmissions were categorized as either emergency or elective and compared between the study arms, as were mortality and potential confoundeis (age, gender, number of comorbidities), with Poisson regression analysis. Results: Of case notes of eligible COPD patients, 60% had the ACCORD guideline placed, of which 76% had evidence of use as judged by completion of guideline entry and tick boxes. The ACCORD guideline was associated with an increase in elective admissions and a reduction in emergency admissions in the intervention group in relation to the control group (P < 0.01), with no difference in overall admissions or death rates. Conclusions: The ACCORD guideline was associated with a shift from emergency admissions to more planned elective care, suggesting more proactive care of health problems, but without overall reduction in admissions.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of coordinated care for chronic respiratory disease. Design and setting: Community‐based geographical control study, in western (intervention) and northern (...

Aims: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) permit safe and effective treatment of uncomplicated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at home. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost minimization, cost shifting and patient satisfaction associated with at‐home DVT treatment using the LMWH enoxaparin, compared to standard inpatient care in an Australian health‐care setting. Methods: Subjects presenting with a principal diagnosis of uncomplicated DVT to the Emergency Department at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, were recruited over 1997–1999. Costs to the hospital, to Federal funding (Medicare) and to patients were tracked prospectively, and satisfaction was also measured. Subjects were matched to historical controls (1994–1997) for age, gender and level of comorbidity (same or lower) by two medical officers who were blinded to costs. Control costs were obtained using the clinical costing system Trendstar®, and adjusted for consumer price index. Results: Twenty‐eight subjects participated in the at‐home programme. Of these, 26 were discharged without any inpatient admission (including one who agreed to self‐injection) and two were admitted briefly. Audit demonstrated that only 29% of eligible subjects were managed at home. Mean (SEM) total treatment cost was $756 (76) per patient for at‐home, and $2208 (146) for controls. Minimal cost shifts to patients and to Medicare occurred, and satisfaction was high. Conclusions: At‐home treatment of uncomplicated DVT using enoxaparin in an Australian metropolitan setting provides effective cost minimization, with little cost‐shifting. Our cost minimisation estimates are conservative as most at‐home subjects received enoxaparin twice daily (now used once per day) and controls had at least as high comorbidity. However, uptake of the at‐home programme was limited. (Intern Med J 2002; 32: 29–34)

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) permit safe and effective treatment of uncomplicated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at home. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost minimization, cost shifting and patient satisfaction associated with at-home DVT treatment using the LMWH enoxaparin, compared to standard inpatient care in an Australian health-care setting. Subjects presenting with a principal diagnosis of uncomplicated DVT to the Emergency Department at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, were recruited over 1997-1999. Costs to the hospital, to Federal funding (Medicare) and to patients were tracked prospectively, and satisfaction was also measured. Subjects were matched to historical controls (1994-1997) for age, gender and level of comorbidity (same or lower) by two medical officers who were blinded to costs. Control costs were obtained using the clinical costing system Trendstar, and adjusted for consumer price index. Twenty-eight subjects participated in the at-home programme. Of these, 26 were discharged without any inpatient admission (including one who agreed to self-injection) and two were admitted briefly. Audit demonstrated that only 29% of eligible subjects were managed at home. Mean (SEM) total treatment cost was $756 (76) per patient for at-home, and $2,208 (146) for controls. Minimal cost shifts to patients and to Medicare occurred, and satisfaction was high. At-home treatment of uncomplicated DVT using enoxaparin in an Australian metropolitan setting provides effective cost minimization, with little cost-shifting. Our cost minimisation estimates are conservative as most at-home subjects received enoxaparin twice daily (now used once per day) and controls had at least as high comorbidity. However, uptake of the at-home programme was limited.