Alan Kingstone
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alan Kingstone has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- James Theodore Enns
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
2 shared publications C. Mark Wessinger
University of Michigan
1 shared publicationGeorge R Mangun
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis
1 shared publicationMichael S Gazzaniga
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis
1 shared publicationPatricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
University of California
1 shared publicationRobert Fendrich
University of California
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 March 1995
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 6 (2) , 118-121
Guided Visual Search Is a Left-Hemisphere Process in Split-Brain Patients
Previous research has shown that split-brain (callosotomy) patients search through visual displays twice as fast as normal observers when items are divided evenly between visual hemi-fields, as though each disconnected hemisphere possessed its own attentional scanning system (Luck, Hillyard, Mangun, & Gazzaniga, 1989, 1994) Results from 3 split-brain patients in the present study indicate that the ability to limit search to a relevant subset of the visual display is lateralized to the left cerebral hemisphere This ability to perform guided search was not shown in the right hemisphere, even when the search time in that hemisphere was superior to search time in the left Furthermore, guided search was observed for both hemifields in normal control observers These findings suggest that, as with higher cognitive processes such as language, strategic visuospatial attentional processes are preferentially lateralized to the left cerebral hemisphere The findings also imply that the callosum mediates guided search in the right hemisphere of normal subjects
- 1 March 1995
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 6 (2) , 118-121
Guided Visual Search Is a Left-Hemisphere Process in Split-Brain Patients
Previous research has shown that split-brain (callosotomy) patients search through visual displays twice as fast as normal observers when items are divided evenly between visual hemi-fields, as though each disconnected hemisphere possessed its own attentional scanning system (Luck, Hillyard, Mangun, & Gazzaniga, 1989, 1994) Results from 3 split-brain patients in the present study indicate that the ability to limit search to a relevant subset of the visual display is lateralized to the left cerebral hemisphere This ability to perform guided search was not shown in the right hemisphere, even when the search time in that hemisphere was superior to search time in the left Furthermore, guided search was observed for both hemifields in normal control observers These findings suggest that, as with higher cognitive processes such as language, strategic visuospatial attentional processes are preferentially lateralized to the left cerebral hemisphere The findings also imply that the callosum mediates guided search in the right hemisphere of normal subjects
- Open Access
- 1 January 1995
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 57 (6) , 796-801
Are microsaccades responsible for the gap effect?
Extinguishing a fixation point shortly before, or concurrently with, the onset of a peripheral visual target reduces the latency of saccades to that target. Saslow (1967) hypothesized that thisgap effect might occur because fixation point offsets reduce the incidence of corrective microsaccades with an associated saccadic refractory period. In the present study, a robust gap effect was obtained. However, using a Purkinje image eyetracker with 1 arcmin of resolution, we found that fixation point offsets had no effect on the occurrence of microsaccades and that the occurrence of microsaccades had no impact on the magnitude of the gap effect. Microsaccades therefore do not appear to play any part in the production of the gap effect.
- 1 January 1995
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 57 (6) , 796-801
Open AccessAre microsaccades responsible for the gap effect?
Extinguishing a fixation point shortly before, or concurrently with, the onset of a peripheral visual target reduces the latency of saccades to that target. Saslow (1967) hypothesized that thisgap effect might occur because fixation point offsets reduce the incidence of corrective microsaccades with an associated saccadic refractory period. In the present study, a robust gap effect was obtained. However, using a Purkinje image eyetracker with 1 arcmin of resolution, we found that fixation point offsets had no effect on the occurrence of microsaccades and that the occurrence of microsaccades had no impact on the magnitude of the gap effect. Microsaccades therefore do not appear to play any part in the production of the gap effect.
- 1 January 1994
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA)
Access to Global and Local Properties in Visual Search
- 1 January 1994
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA)
Access to Global and Local Properties in Visual Search