IMIvo Mueller

Ivo Mueller

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ivo Mueller has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Comparison of diagnostic methods for the detection and quantification of the four sympatric Plasmodium species in field samples from Papua New Guinea

    by Anna Rosanas-Urgell, Dania Mueller, Inoni Betuela, Céline Barnadas, Jonah Iga, Peter A Zimmerman, Hernando A del Portillo, Peter Siba, Ivo Mueller, Ingrid Felger

    Accurate diagnosis of Plasmodium infections is essential for malaria morbidity and mortality reduction in tropical areas. Despite great advantages of light microscopy (LM) for malaria diagnosis, its limited sensitivity is a critical shortfall for epidemiological studies. Robust molecular diagnostics tools are thus needed.


  • Effectiveness of dengue control practices in household water containers in Northeast Thailand

    by Suparat Phuanukoonnon, Ivo Mueller, Joan H. Bryan

    Summary: Objective  To investigate the influence of larval control methods (using temephos, keeping fish and covering containers with lids), water use and weekly cleaning of containers on the presence of Aedes aegypti larvae in water‐storage containers in rural and urban households in Khon Kaen province.Method  Cross‐sectional questionnaire survey and larval survey covered 966 households and 5821 containers were inspected.Result  In rural and urban areas larval control was patchy and often ineffective. Consequently, the mosquito indices exceed the target indices for dengue control with the Breteau Indices of 201 and 113, and Container Indices of 25 and 28 in rural and urban areas, respectively. The containers most frequently infested with larvae were rectangular cement containers storing water for bathing (rural: 37.2%; urban: 35%) and flushing the toilets (rural: 35.7%; urban: 34.3%). Keeping fish [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.08–0.16] was the most effective methods of control. Correctly covering containers with lids was similarly effective (AOR: 0.10–0.25) when used on jars for storing drinking water. However, frequent use of containers reduced the effectiveness of lids. Temephos was effective only in dragon jars in urban areas (AOR: 0.46) where a standard package of temephos were available. Weekly cleaning of containers was an effective method for larval control in most types of containers. A combination of control methods increased effectiveness.Conclusion  This study highlights the complex interaction of household water use and larval control practices as well as the importance of determining the most effective control measures compatible with water practices for implementing control promotion.