A. Kathy Romer

We present the results of a comprehensive set of simulations designed to quantify the selection function of the Bright SHARC survey for distant clusters. The statistical significance of the simulations relied on the creation of many thousands of artificial clusters with redshifts and luminosities in the range 0.25 < z < 0.95 and 0.5 < LX < 10 × 1044 ergs s-1 (0.5-2.0 keV). We created one standard and 19 varied distribution functions, each of which assumed a different set of cluster, cosmological and operational parameters. The parameters we varied included the values of Ω0, ΩΛ, β, core radius (rc), and ellipticity (e). We also investigated how nonstandard surface brightness profiles (i.e., the Navarro, Frenk, & White, or NFW, model); cooling flows; and the ROSAT pointing target, influence the selection function in the Bright SHARC survey. For our standard set we adopted the parameters used during the derivation of the Bright SHARC Cluster X-Ray Luminosity Function (CXLF), i.e., Ω0 = 1, ΩΛ = 0 and an isothermal β model with β = 0.67, rc = 250 kpc, and e = 0.15. We found that certain parameters have a dramatic effect on our ability to detect clusters, e.g., the presence of a NFW profile or a strong cooling flow profile, or the value of rc and β. Other parameters had very little effect, e.g., the type of ROSAT target and the cluster ellipticity. At distant redshift (z > 0.8), elliptical clusters are significantly easier to detect than spherical ones in the Bright SHARC survey. We show also that all the tested parameters have only a small influence on the computed luminosity of the clusters (recovered luminosity in the text) except the presence of a strong cooling flow. We conclude that the CXLF presented by Nichol et al. in 1999 is robust (under the assumption of standard parameters), but stress the importance of cluster follow-up, by Chandra and XMM, in order to better constrain the morphology of the distant clusters found in the Bright SHARC and other surveys.

This paper describes a serendipitous galaxy cluster survey that we plan to conduct with the XMM X-ray satellite. We have modeled the expected properties of such a survey for three different cosmological models, using an extended Press-Schechter (Press & Schechter 1974) formalism, combined with a detailed characterization of the expected capabilities of the EPIC camera on board XMM. We estimate that, over the ten year design lifetime of XMM, the EPIC camera will image a total of ~800 square degrees in fields suitable for the serendipitous detection of clusters of galaxies. For the presently-favored low-density model with a cosmological constant, our simulations predict that this survey area would yield a catalogue of more than 8000 clusters, ranging from poor to very rich systems, with around 750 detections above z=1. A low-density open Universe yields similar numbers, though with a different redshift distribution, while a critical-density Universe gives considerably fewer clusters. This dependence of catalogue properties on cosmology means that the proposed survey will place strong constraints on the values of Omega-Matter and Omega-Lambda. The survey would also facilitate a variety of follow-up projects, including the quantification of evolution in the cluster X-ray luminosity-temperature relation, the study of high-redshift galaxies via gravitational lensing, follow-up observations of the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and foreground analyses of cosmic microwave background maps.

We present the Bright SHARC (Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster) Survey, which is an objective search for serendipitously detected extended X-ray sources in 460 deep ROSAT PSPC pointings. The Bright SHARC Survey covers an area of 178.6 sq.deg and has yielded 374 extended sources. We discuss the X-ray data reduction, the candidate selection and present results from our on-going optical follow-up campaign. The optical follow-up concentrates on the brightest 94 of the 374 extended sources and is now 97% complete. We have identified thirty-seven clusters of galaxies, for which we present redshifts and luminosities. The clusters span a redshift range of 0.0696<z<0.83 and a luminosity range of 0.065<Lx<8.3e44 erg/s [0.5-2.0 keV] (assuming Ho = 50 km/s/Mpc and qo=0.5). Twelve of the clusters have redshifts greater than z=0.3, eight of which are at luminosities brighter than Lx=3e44 erg/s. Seventeen of the 37 optically confirmed Bright SHARC clusters have not been listed in any previously published catalog. We also report the discovery of three candidate ``fossil groups'' of the kind proposed by Ponman et al. (1994).

We present the results of a set of simulations designed to quantify the selection function of the Bright SHARC survey for distant clusters. The statistical significance of the simulations relied on the creation of thousands of artificial clusters with redshifts and luminosities in the range 0.25<z<0.95 and 0.5<L_X<10x10^44 erg/s (0.5-2.0 keV). We created 1 standard and 19 varied distribution functions, each of which assumed a different set of cluster, cosmological and operational parameters. The parameters we varied included the values of Omega_0, Omega_Lambda, Beta, core radius and ellipticity. We also investigated how non-standard surface brightness profiles; cooling flows; and the ROSAT pointing target, influence the selection function in the Bright SHARC survey. For our standard set we adopted the parameters used during the derivation of the Bright SHARC Cluster X-ray Luminosity Function (CXLF), i.e. Omega_0=1, Omega_Lambda=0 and an isothermal Beta model with beta=0.67, r_c=250 kpc and e=0.15. We found that certain parameters have a dramatic effect on our ability to detect clusters, e.g. the presence of a NFW profile or a strong cooling flow profile, or the value of r_c and beta. Other parameters had very little effect, e.g. the type of ROSAT target and the cluster ellipticity. We show also that all the tested parameters have only a small influence on the computed luminosity of the clusters except the presence of a strong cooling flow. We conclude that the CXLF presented in Nichol et al. (1999) is robust (under the assumption of standard parameters), but stress the importance of cluster follow-up in order to better constrain the morphology of the distant clusters found in the Bright SHARC and other surveys.

We present the Bright SHARC (Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster) Survey, which is an objective search for serendipitously detected extended X-ray sources in 460 deep ROSAT PSPC pointings. The Bright SHARC Survey covers an area of 178.6 sq.deg and has yielded 374 extended sources. We discuss the X-ray data reduction, the candidate selection and present results from our on-going optical follow-up campaign. The optical follow-up concentrates on the brightest 94 of the 374 extended sources and is now 97% complete. We have identified thirty-seven clusters of galaxies, for which we present redshifts and luminosities. The clusters span a redshift range of 0.0696<z<0.83 and a luminosity range of 0.065<Lx<8.3e44 erg/s [0.5-2.0 keV] (assuming Ho = 50 km/s/Mpc and qo=0.5). Twelve of the clusters have redshifts greater than z=0.3, eight of which are at luminosities brighter than Lx=3e44 erg/s. Seventeen of the 37 optically confirmed Bright SHARC clusters have not been listed in any previously published catalog. We also report the discovery of three candidate ``fossil groups'' of the kind proposed by Ponman et al. (1994).Comment: Minor revisions: References updated and typos corrected. Shortened by use of emulateapj.st