D.G.A. Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité

Migrainous headache is reported by patients with photosensitive epilepsy, whereas their relatives complain more often about headache than the relatives of patients with other types of epilepsy. We therefore investigated whether headache itself could be an epileptic symptom related to photosensitivity Four probands with headache and photosensitive epilepsy were selected. Their first-degree family members were studied using video-EEG with extensive intermittent photic stimulation and pattern stimulation. Nine of the 12 subjects (10 female and two male, mean age 30 years, range 14–46 years) proved to be photosensitive with either focal ( n = 5) or generalized ( n = 4) epileptiform discharges. In two subjects an ictal recording of headache occurred after visual stimulation. We found evidence that, in specific patients, headache could be an ictal sign of epilepsy. Photic stimulation during EEG recording can contribute to correct diagnosis and lead to the best care and management of the patient.

Objective: To assess the activity of brivaracetam, a novel SV2A ligand, in the photosensitivity model as a proof-of-principle of efficacy in patients with epilepsy. Methods: A subject-blind placebo-controlled study in patients with photosensitive epilepsy was performed to investigate the effect of single-dose brivaracetam (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg) on photosensitive responses. Each patient was exposed to intermittent photic stimulation that evoked a generalized photoparoxysmal EEG response. Individual standard photosensitivity ranges (SPRs) were recorded post-placebo (day −1) and post-brivaracetam until return to baseline (day 1 to 3). Plasma concentrations of brivaracetam and any concomitant antiepileptic drugs were determined. Results: Of the 18 evaluable patients, none achieved SPR abolishment post-placebo, whereas 14 (78%) achieved complete abolishment post-brivaracetam. Decrease in SPR was seen in 8 patients (44%) post-placebo compared to 17 (94%) post-brivaracetam. Duration of response was twice as long post-brivaracetam 80 mg (59.5 hours) compared with lower doses, although the overall effect was not dose-dependent. Time to maximal photosensitive response was dose-related with the shortest time interval observed at the highest dose (0.5 hours post-brivaracetam 80 mg). The area under the effect curve (SPR change from pre-dose vs time) appeared linearly correlated with the area under the plasma concentration curve. Brivaracetam was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were dizziness and somnolence. Conclusions: Our findings show that brivaracetam clearly suppresses generalized photoparoxysmal EEG response. As such, investigations of the antiepileptic properties and tolerability of brivaracetam are warranted in further clinical studies of patients with epilepsy.