Shawn E. Gurtcheff
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Shawn E. Gurtcheff has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David K. Turok
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA
1 shared publication Greg Stoddard
1 shared publicationKirtly P. Jones
1 shared publicationMark Gibson
1 shared publicationPatricia A. Murphy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 May 2011
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 117 (5) , 1114-1121
Lactogenesis After Early Postpartum Use of the Contraceptive Implant
To evaluate lactogenesis after early postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Healthy peripartum women with healthy, term newborns who desired the etonogestrel implant for contraception were randomly assigned to early (1-3 days) or standard (4-8 weeks) postpartum insertion. The primary outcomes, time to lactogenesis stage II and lactation failure, were documented by a validated measure. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in time to lactogenesis stage II was defined as 8 additional hours. Secondary data (device continuation and contraceptive use, breast milk analysis, supplementation rates, side effects, and bleeding patterns) were collected at periodic intervals for 6 months. Sixty-nine women were enrolled. Thirty-five were randomly assigned to early insertion and 34 to standard insertion. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in age, race, parity, mode of delivery, use of anesthesia, or prior breastfeeding experience. Early insertion was demonstrated to be noninferior to standard insertion in time to lactogenesis stage II (early: [mean±standard deviation] 64.3±19.6 hours; standard: 65.2±18.5 hours, mean difference, -1.4 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.6 to 7.7 hours). Early insertion was also demonstrated to be noninferior to standard insertion in incidence of lactation failure (1/34 [3%] in the early insertion group, 0/35 [0%] in the standard insertion group [risk difference, 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08]). Use of formula supplementation was not significantly different between the groups. Milk composition at 6 weeks was not significantly different between the groups. Breastfeeding outcomes were similar in women who underwent early compared with standard postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel implant. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00847587.
- 1 May 2011
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 117 (5) , 1114-1121
Lactogenesis After Early Postpartum Use of the Contraceptive Implant
To evaluate lactogenesis after early postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Healthy peripartum women with healthy, term newborns who desired the etonogestrel implant for contraception were randomly assigned to early (1-3 days) or standard (4-8 weeks) postpartum insertion. The primary outcomes, time to lactogenesis stage II and lactation failure, were documented by a validated measure. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in time to lactogenesis stage II was defined as 8 additional hours. Secondary data (device continuation and contraceptive use, breast milk analysis, supplementation rates, side effects, and bleeding patterns) were collected at periodic intervals for 6 months. Sixty-nine women were enrolled. Thirty-five were randomly assigned to early insertion and 34 to standard insertion. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in age, race, parity, mode of delivery, use of anesthesia, or prior breastfeeding experience. Early insertion was demonstrated to be noninferior to standard insertion in time to lactogenesis stage II (early: [mean±standard deviation] 64.3±19.6 hours; standard: 65.2±18.5 hours, mean difference, -1.4 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.6 to 7.7 hours). Early insertion was also demonstrated to be noninferior to standard insertion in incidence of lactation failure (1/34 [3%] in the early insertion group, 0/35 [0%] in the standard insertion group [risk difference, 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08]). Use of formula supplementation was not significantly different between the groups. Milk composition at 6 weeks was not significantly different between the groups. Breastfeeding outcomes were similar in women who underwent early compared with standard postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel implant. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00847587.