Andrew M. Isserman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Andrew M. Isserman has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anuttama Dasgupta
Urban Design and Planning Consultant Cherokee Dr
1 shared publication - Drake E. Warren
Sandia National Laboratories
1 shared publication - Edward Feser
Department of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, IL, USA
1 shared publication - Mallory Lynn Rahe
Oregon State University
1 shared publication - Susy Hemphill
University of Illinois
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 5 January 2010
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 287-315
Stinging Real! Four Essays on the Transformative Power of Films and Storytelling in Planning Education
- 5 January 2010
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 287-315
Stinging Real! Four Essays on the Transformative Power of Films and Storytelling in Planning Education
- 9 June 2009
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Regional Science Review
- Vol. 32 (3) , 300-342
Why Some Rural Places Prosper and Others Do Not
More than 300 rural counties are more prosperous than the nation. Each has lower unemployment rates, lower poverty rates, lower school dropout rates, and better housing conditions than the nation. Prosperous counties tend to have more educated populations, more diverse economies, more private non-farm jobs, more farmers and government farm payments, more creative class occupations, and more equal income distributions. They have fewer African-American, American Indian, or Hispanic residents and fewer recent immigrants. Some findings support what many rural people believe to be true: civically engaged religious groups and other identities that bind people together can really matter. Other results contradict conventional wisdom. For instance, climate and distances to cities and major airports, are relatively unimportant. Focusing on prosperity, instead of growth or competitiveness, provides new insights into rural conditions and prospects.
- 9 June 2009
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Regional Science Review
- Vol. 32 (3) , 300-342
Why Some Rural Places Prosper and Others Do Not
More than 300 rural counties are more prosperous than the nation. Each has lower unemployment rates, lower poverty rates, lower school dropout rates, and better housing conditions than the nation. Prosperous counties tend to have more educated populations, more diverse economies, more private non-farm jobs, more farmers and government farm payments, more creative class occupations, and more equal income distributions. They have fewer African-American, American Indian, or Hispanic residents and fewer recent immigrants. Some findings support what many rural people believe to be true: civically engaged religious groups and other identities that bind people together can really matter. Other results contradict conventional wisdom. For instance, climate and distances to cities and major airports, are relatively unimportant. Focusing on prosperity, instead of growth or competitiveness, provides new insights into rural conditions and prospects.