Ken Sexton
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Ken Sexton has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Gurumurthy Ramachandran
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
4 shared publications- John L. Adgate
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
4 shared publications Gregory C. Pratt
School of Public Health, University of Texas, Brownsville Regional Campus, RAHC Building, 80 Fort Brown, Brownsville, Texas 78520, Division of Environmental & Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, and School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030
2 shared publicationsMaria T. Morandi
School of Public Health, University of Texas, Brownsville Regional Campus, RAHC Building, 80 Fort Brown, Brownsville, Texas 78520, Division of Environmental & Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, and School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030
2 shared publicationsSteven J. Mongin
School of Public Health, University of Texas, Brownsville Regional Campus, RAHC Building, 80 Fort Brown, Brownsville, Texas 78520, Division of Environmental & Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, and School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030
2 shared publicationsThomas H. Stock
School of Public Health, University of Texas, Brownsville Regional Campus, RAHC Building, 80 Fort Brown, Brownsville, Texas 78520, Division of Environmental & Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, and School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 113 (3) , 342-349
Children’s Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds as Determined by Longitudinal Measurements in Blood
Blood concentrations of 11 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured up to four times over 2 years in a probability sample of more than 150 children from two poor, minority neighborhoods in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Blood levels of benzene, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene, and m-/p-xylene were comparable with those measured in selected adults from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), whereas concentrations of ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethylene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and o-xylene were two or more times lower in the children. Blood levels of styrene were more than twice as high, and for about 10% of the children 1,4-dichlorobenzene levels were ≥10 times higher compared with NHANES III subjects. We observed strong statistical associations between numerous pairwise combinations of individual VOCs in blood (e.g., benzene and m-/p-xylene, m-/p-xylene and o-xylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and m-/p-xylene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane and trichloroethene). Between-child variability was higher than within-child variability for 1,4-dichlorobenzene and tetrachloroethylene. Between- and within-child variability were approximately the same for ethylbenzene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and between-child was lower than within-child variability for the other seven compounds. Two-day, integrated personal air measurements explained almost 79% of the variance in blood levels for 1,4-dichlorobenzene and approximately 20% for tetrachloroethylene, toluene, m-/p-xylene, and o-xylene. Personal air measurements explained much less of the variance (between 0.5 and 8%) for trichloroethene, styrene, benzene, and ethylbenzene. We observed no significant statistical associations between total urinary cotinine (a biomarker for exposure to environmental tobacco smoke) and blood VOC concentrations. For siblings living in the same household, we found strong statistical associations between measured blood VOC concentrations.
- 1 March 2005
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 113 (3) , 342-349
Open AccessChildren’s Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds as Determined by Longitudinal Measurements in Blood
Blood concentrations of 11 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured up to four times over 2 years in a probability sample of more than 150 children from two poor, minority neighborhoods in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Blood levels of benzene, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene, and m-/p-xylene were comparable with those measured in selected adults from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), whereas concentrations of ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethylene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and o-xylene were two or more times lower in the children. Blood levels of styrene were more than twice as high, and for about 10% of the children 1,4-dichlorobenzene levels were ≥10 times higher compared with NHANES III subjects. We observed strong statistical associations between numerous pairwise combinations of individual VOCs in blood (e.g., benzene and m-/p-xylene, m-/p-xylene and o-xylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and m-/p-xylene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane and trichloroethene). Between-child variability was higher than within-child variability for 1,4-dichlorobenzene and tetrachloroethylene. Between- and within-child variability were approximately the same for ethylbenzene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and between-child was lower than within-child variability for the other seven compounds. Two-day, integrated personal air measurements explained almost 79% of the variance in blood levels for 1,4-dichlorobenzene and approximately 20% for tetrachloroethylene, toluene, m-/p-xylene, and o-xylene. Personal air measurements explained much less of the variance (between 0.5 and 8%) for trichloroethene, styrene, benzene, and ethylbenzene. We observed no significant statistical associations between total urinary cotinine (a biomarker for exposure to environmental tobacco smoke) and blood VOC concentrations. For siblings living in the same household, we found strong statistical associations between measured blood VOC concentrations.
- 3 November 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
- Vol. 15 (4) , 350-356
Comparison of recruitment, retention, and compliance results for three children's exposure monitoring studies
- 3 November 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
- Vol. 15 (4) , 350-356
Comparison of recruitment, retention, and compliance results for three children's exposure monitoring studies
- 31 March 2004
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 38 (9) , 2593-2602
Evaluating Differences between Measured Personal Exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds and Concentrations in Outdoor and Indoor Air
Accurate estimation of human exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is a key element of strategies designed to protect public health from the adverse effects of hazardous air pollutants. The focus here is on examining the capability of three different exposure metrics (outdoor community concentrations, indoor residential concentrations, and a simple time-weighted model) to estimate observed personal exposures to 14 VOCs. The analysis is based on 2-day average concentrations of individual VOCs measured concurrently in outdoor (O) air in three urban neighborhoods, indoor (I) air in participant's residences, and personal (P) air near the breathing zone of 71 healthy, nonsmoking adults. A median of four matched P−I−O samples was collected for each study participant in Minneapolis/St. Paul over three seasons (spring, summer, and fall) in 1999 using charcoal-based passive air samplers (3M model 3500 organic vapor monitors). Results show a clear pattern for the 14 VOCs, with P > I > O concentrations. Intra-individual variability typically spanned at least an order of magnitude, and inter-individual variability spanned 2 or more orders of magnitude for each of the 14 VOCs. Although both O and I concentrations generally underestimated personal exposures, I concentrations provided a substantially better estimate of measured P concentrations. Mean squared error (MSE) as well as correlation measures were used to assess estimator performance at the subject-specific level, and hierarchical, mixed effects models were used to estimate the bias and variance components of MSE by tertile of personal exposure. Bias and variance both tended to increase in the upper third of the P exposure distribution for O versus P and I versus P. A simple time-weighted model incorporating measured concentrations in both outdoor community air and indoor residential air provided no improvement over I concentration alone for the estimation of P exposure.
- 31 March 2004
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 38 (9) , 2593-2602
Evaluating Differences between Measured Personal Exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds and Concentrations in Outdoor and Indoor Air
Accurate estimation of human exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is a key element of strategies designed to protect public health from the adverse effects of hazardous air pollutants. The focus here is on examining the capability of three different exposure metrics (outdoor community concentrations, indoor residential concentrations, and a simple time-weighted model) to estimate observed personal exposures to 14 VOCs. The analysis is based on 2-day average concentrations of individual VOCs measured concurrently in outdoor (O) air in three urban neighborhoods, indoor (I) air in participant's residences, and personal (P) air near the breathing zone of 71 healthy, nonsmoking adults. A median of four matched P−I−O samples was collected for each study participant in Minneapolis/St. Paul over three seasons (spring, summer, and fall) in 1999 using charcoal-based passive air samplers (3M model 3500 organic vapor monitors). Results show a clear pattern for the 14 VOCs, with P > I > O concentrations. Intra-individual variability typically spanned at least an order of magnitude, and inter-individual variability spanned 2 or more orders of magnitude for each of the 14 VOCs. Although both O and I concentrations generally underestimated personal exposures, I concentrations provided a substantially better estimate of measured P concentrations. Mean squared error (MSE) as well as correlation measures were used to assess estimator performance at the subject-specific level, and hierarchical, mixed effects models were used to estimate the bias and variance components of MSE by tertile of personal exposure. Bias and variance both tended to increase in the upper third of the P exposure distribution for O versus P and I versus P. A simple time-weighted model incorporating measured concentrations in both outdoor community air and indoor residential air provided no improvement over I concentration alone for the estimation of P exposure.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2004
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 112 (3) , 392-397
Children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: using diverse exposure metrics to document ethnic/racial differences.
Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
- 1 March 2004
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 112 (3) , 392-397
Open AccessChildren's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: using diverse exposure metrics to document ethnic/racial differences.
Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives is an Open Access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
- 12 December 2003
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 38 (2) , 423-430
Comparison of Personal, Indoor, and Outdoor Exposures to Hazardous Air Pollutants in Three Urban Communities
Two-day average concentrations of 15 individual volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured concurrently in (a) ambient air in three urban neighborhoods, (b) air inside residences of participants, and (c) personal air near the breathing zone of 71 healthy, nonsmoking adults. The outdoor (O), indoor (I), and personal (P) samples were collected in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area over three seasons (spring, summer, and fall) in 1999 using charcoal-based passive air samplers (3M model 3500 organic vapor monitors). A hierarchical, mixed-effects statistical model was used to estimate the mutually adjusted effects of monitor location, community, and season while accounting for within-subject and within-time-index (monitoring period) correlation. Outdoor VOC concentrations were relatively low compared to many other urban areas, and only minor seasonal differences were observed. A consistent pattern of P > I > O was observed across both communities and seasons for 13 of 15 individual VOCs (exceptions were carbon tetrachloride and chloroform). Results indicate that ambient VOC measurements at central monitoring sites can seriously under-estimate actual exposures for urban residents, even when the outdoor measurements are taken in their own neighborhoods.
- 12 December 2003
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 38 (2) , 423-430
Comparison of Personal, Indoor, and Outdoor Exposures to Hazardous Air Pollutants in Three Urban Communities
Two-day average concentrations of 15 individual volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured concurrently in (a) ambient air in three urban neighborhoods, (b) air inside residences of participants, and (c) personal air near the breathing zone of 71 healthy, nonsmoking adults. The outdoor (O), indoor (I), and personal (P) samples were collected in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area over three seasons (spring, summer, and fall) in 1999 using charcoal-based passive air samplers (3M model 3500 organic vapor monitors). A hierarchical, mixed-effects statistical model was used to estimate the mutually adjusted effects of monitor location, community, and season while accounting for within-subject and within-time-index (monitoring period) correlation. Outdoor VOC concentrations were relatively low compared to many other urban areas, and only minor seasonal differences were observed. A consistent pattern of P > I > O was observed across both communities and seasons for 13 of 15 individual VOCs (exceptions were carbon tetrachloride and chloroform). Results indicate that ambient VOC measurements at central monitoring sites can seriously under-estimate actual exposures for urban residents, even when the outdoor measurements are taken in their own neighborhoods.