MTMarianne Toftegaard

Marianne Toftegaard

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Marianne Toftegaard has a total of 2 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Evaluation of a method for converting venous values of acid-base and oxygenation status to arterial values

    by M Toftegaard, S E Rees, S Andreassen

    Objective: This paper evaluates a method in which arterial values of pH, carbon dioxide tension (Pco2) and oxygen tension (Po2) calculated from venous values and pulse oximetry are compared with simultaneously measured arterial values. Methods: 103 adult patients from three departments (pulmonary medicine, thoracic intensive care and multidisciplinary intensive care) were studied. The patients belonged to three groups: (1) 31 haemodynamically stable patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD); (2) 49 haemodynamically stable patients without COLD; and (3) 23 haemodynamically unstable patients without COLD. Arterial and venous (peripheral and, where possible, central and mixed) blood samples were taken simultaneously and anaerobically. Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation was measured with a pulse oximeter. The principle of the method is to simulate the transport of venous blood back through the tissues using the respiratory quotient (adding oxygen and removing carbon dioxide) until simulated arterial oxygenation matches that measured by pulse oximetry. Results: Calculated values of arterial pH and Pco2 had very small bias and standard deviations regardless of the venous sampling site. In all cases these errors were within those considered acceptable for the performance of laboratory equipment, and well within the limits of error acceptable in clinical practice. In addition, the standard deviation (SD) of calculated values of pH and Pco2 was similar to the variability between consecutive arterial samples. For peripheral oxygen saturation values ⩽96%, the method can calculate Po2 with an SD of 0.93, which may be useful in clinical practice. Calculations made from peripheral venous blood were significantly more accurate than those from central venous blood. Conclusion: Arterial pH and Pco2 can be calculated precisely from peripheral venous blood in a broad patient population. The method has potential for use as a screening tool in emergency medical departments and in medical and surgical wards to assess a patient’s acid-base and oxygenation status prior to sampling arterial blood or to help in the decision to refer the patient to the ICU. In departments where arterial blood gas values are used to monitor patients (eg, pulmonary medicine), the method might reduce the number of arterial samples taken by replacing them with peripheral venous blood samples, thus reducing the need for painful arterial punctures.


  • Correlation between acid–base parameters measured in arterial blood and venous blood sampled peripherally, from vena cavae superior, and from the pulmonary artery

    by Marianne Toftegaard, Stephen E. Rees, Steen Andreassen

    In intensive care units arterial blood sampling is routine for analysing acid-base and oxygenation status. In nonintensive departments arterial blood sampling is seldom performed. Venous blood sampling is routine but not usually analysed for acid-base and oxygenation status. This study describes the correlation between arterial and peripheral, central and mixed venous pH, PCO2 and PO2 in a wide range of adult patients. Arterial and venous blood samples were taken anaerobically and simultaneously. The values of pH, PCO2 and PO2 were compared using Bland-Altman plots. A total of 103 patients were included. The arteriovenous difference (bias+/-SD) for pH was 0.026+/-0.023 and for PCO2 -0.60+/-0.57 kPa (peripheral venous blood), 0.036+/-0.014 and -0.79+/-0.26 kPa (central venous blood) and 0.026+/-0.010 and -0.67+/-0.22 kPa (mixed venous blood). The arteriovenous difference for PO2 for peripheral, central and mixed venous blood was 6.27+/-4.36, 8.33+/-3.94 and 11.00+/-4.87 kPa, respectively. The venous values of pH, corrected for bias, can give arterial values which are within reasonable laboratory and clinical acceptance criteria. For PCO2 this is also true, except for peripheral blood, where the standard deviation is outside laboratory acceptance criteria but within clinical acceptance criteria. For PO2 the arteriovenous differences are not randomly distributed and even for PO2<or=12 kPa the value of the mean difference is clearly outside both laboratory and reasonable clinical acceptance criteria.