Stefano D'ARrigo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Stefano D'ARrigo has a total of 43 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Sara Bulgheroni
Unit for Neurogenetic syndromes with Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorders, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
4 shared publications - Chiara Pantaleoni
Developmental Neurology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
3 shared publications Daria Riva
Developmental Neurology Department, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta," Milan, Italy
3 shared publicationsEnrico Alfei
Developmental Neurology Department, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta," Milan, Italy
2 shared publications- Luisa Chiapparini
Neuroradiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2 shared publications - Andrea Poretti
Section of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 154, 167-180
Cognitive aspects: sequencing, behavior, and executive functions
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 154, 167-180
Cognitive aspects: sequencing, behavior, and executive functions
- 28 October 2015
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Child Neurology
- Vol. 31 (6) , 691-699
The Diagnostic Yield of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Is High Regardless of Severity of Intellectual Disability/Developmental Delay in Children
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization is a method of molecular analysis that identifies chromosomal anomalies (or copy number variants) that correlate with clinical phenotypes. The aim of the present study was to apply a clinical score previously designated by de Vries to 329 patients with intellectual disability/developmental disorder (intellectual disability/developmental delay) referred to our tertiary center and to see whether the clinical factors are associated with a positive outcome of aCGH analyses. Another goal was to test the association between a positive microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization result and the severity of intellectual disability/developmental delay. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization identified structural chromosomal alterations responsible for the intellectual disability/developmental delay phenotype in 16% of our sample. Our study showed that causative copy number variants are frequently found even in cases of mild intellectual disability (30.77%). We want to emphasize the need to conduct microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization on all individuals with intellectual disability/developmental delay, regardless of the severity, because the degree of intellectual disability/developmental delay does not predict the diagnostic yield of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
- 28 October 2015
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Child Neurology
- Vol. 31 (6) , 691-699
The Diagnostic Yield of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Is High Regardless of Severity of Intellectual Disability/Developmental Delay in Children
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization is a method of molecular analysis that identifies chromosomal anomalies (or copy number variants) that correlate with clinical phenotypes. The aim of the present study was to apply a clinical score previously designated by de Vries to 329 patients with intellectual disability/developmental disorder (intellectual disability/developmental delay) referred to our tertiary center and to see whether the clinical factors are associated with a positive outcome of aCGH analyses. Another goal was to test the association between a positive microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization result and the severity of intellectual disability/developmental delay. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization identified structural chromosomal alterations responsible for the intellectual disability/developmental delay phenotype in 16% of our sample. Our study showed that causative copy number variants are frequently found even in cases of mild intellectual disability (30.77%). We want to emphasize the need to conduct microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization on all individuals with intellectual disability/developmental delay, regardless of the severity, because the degree of intellectual disability/developmental delay does not predict the diagnostic yield of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
- Open Access
- 11 January 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
- Vol. 7 (1) , 4
Delineation and Diagnostic Criteria of Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome Type VI
Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome type VI (OFD VI) represents a rare phenotypic subtype of Joubert syndrome and related disorders (JSRD). In the original report polydactyly, oral findings, intellectual disability, and absence of the cerebellar vermis at post-mortem characterized the syndrome. Subsequently, the molar tooth sign (MTS) has been found in patients with OFD VI, prompting the inclusion of OFD VI in JSRD. We studied the clinical, neurodevelopmental, neuroimaging, and genetic findings in a cohort of 16 patients with OFD VI. We derived the following inclusion criteria from the literature: 1) MTS and one oral finding and polydactyly, or 2) MTS and more than one typical oral finding. The OFD VI neuroimaging pattern was found to be more severe than in other JSRD subgroups and includes severe hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis, hypoplastic and dysplastic cerebellar hemispheres, marked enlargement of the posterior fossa, increased retrocerebellar collection of cerebrospinal fluid, abnormal brainstem, and frequently supratentorial abnormalities that occasionally include characteristic hypothalamic hamartomas. Additionally, two new JSRD neuroimaging findings (ascending superior cerebellar peduncles and fused thalami) have been identified. Tongue hamartomas, additional frenula, upper lip notch, and mesoaxial polydactyly are specific findings in OFD VI, while cleft lip/palate and other types of polydactyly of hands and feet are not specific. Involvement of other organs may include ocular findings, particularly colobomas. The majority of the patients have absent motor development and profound cognitive impairment. In OFD VI, normal cognitive functions are possible, but exceptional. Sequencing of known JSRD genes in most patients failed to detect pathogenetic mutations, therefore the genetic basis of OFD VI remains unknown. Compared with other JSRD subgroups, the neurological findings and impairment of motor development and cognitive functions in OFD VI are significantly worse, suggesting a correlation with the more severe neuroimaging findings. Based on the literature and this study we suggest as diagnostic criteria for OFD VI: MTS and one or more of the following: 1) tongue hamartoma(s) and/or additional frenula and/or upper lip notch; 2) mesoaxial polydactyly of one or more hands or feet; 3) hypothalamic hamartoma.
- 11 January 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
- Vol. 7 (1) , 4
Open AccessDelineation and Diagnostic Criteria of Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome Type VI
Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome type VI (OFD VI) represents a rare phenotypic subtype of Joubert syndrome and related disorders (JSRD). In the original report polydactyly, oral findings, intellectual disability, and absence of the cerebellar vermis at post-mortem characterized the syndrome. Subsequently, the molar tooth sign (MTS) has been found in patients with OFD VI, prompting the inclusion of OFD VI in JSRD. We studied the clinical, neurodevelopmental, neuroimaging, and genetic findings in a cohort of 16 patients with OFD VI. We derived the following inclusion criteria from the literature: 1) MTS and one oral finding and polydactyly, or 2) MTS and more than one typical oral finding. The OFD VI neuroimaging pattern was found to be more severe than in other JSRD subgroups and includes severe hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis, hypoplastic and dysplastic cerebellar hemispheres, marked enlargement of the posterior fossa, increased retrocerebellar collection of cerebrospinal fluid, abnormal brainstem, and frequently supratentorial abnormalities that occasionally include characteristic hypothalamic hamartomas. Additionally, two new JSRD neuroimaging findings (ascending superior cerebellar peduncles and fused thalami) have been identified. Tongue hamartomas, additional frenula, upper lip notch, and mesoaxial polydactyly are specific findings in OFD VI, while cleft lip/palate and other types of polydactyly of hands and feet are not specific. Involvement of other organs may include ocular findings, particularly colobomas. The majority of the patients have absent motor development and profound cognitive impairment. In OFD VI, normal cognitive functions are possible, but exceptional. Sequencing of known JSRD genes in most patients failed to detect pathogenetic mutations, therefore the genetic basis of OFD VI remains unknown. Compared with other JSRD subgroups, the neurological findings and impairment of motor development and cognitive functions in OFD VI are significantly worse, suggesting a correlation with the more severe neuroimaging findings. Based on the literature and this study we suggest as diagnostic criteria for OFD VI: MTS and one or more of the following: 1) tongue hamartoma(s) and/or additional frenula and/or upper lip notch; 2) mesoaxial polydactyly of one or more hands or feet; 3) hypothalamic hamartoma.
- 1 August 2008
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Child Neurology
- Vol. 23 (8) , 895-900
Ataxia With Oculomotor Apraxia Type 1 (AOA1): Clinical and Neuropsychological Features in 2 New Patients and Differential Diagnosis
Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 1 (AOA1) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by early-onset and slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia, areflexia, and peripheral neuropathy. Ocular apraxia is most prominent in the early stage of the disease, by contrast, hypoalbuminemia, hypercholesterolemia, and cognitive impairment are present in the adult stage. AOA1 is caused by a mutation in the APTX gene (9p13.3) encoding a nuclear protein named aprataxin, which is involved in the mechanism of DNA repair. We report here the clinical features of 2 patients with mutations in the APTX gene, and we discuss the differential diagnosis with other forms of hereditary ataxia.
- 1 August 2008
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Child Neurology
- Vol. 23 (8) , 895-900
Ataxia With Oculomotor Apraxia Type 1 (AOA1): Clinical and Neuropsychological Features in 2 New Patients and Differential Diagnosis
Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 1 (AOA1) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by early-onset and slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia, areflexia, and peripheral neuropathy. Ocular apraxia is most prominent in the early stage of the disease, by contrast, hypoalbuminemia, hypercholesterolemia, and cognitive impairment are present in the adult stage. AOA1 is caused by a mutation in the APTX gene (9p13.3) encoding a nuclear protein named aprataxin, which is involved in the mechanism of DNA repair. We report here the clinical features of 2 patients with mutations in the APTX gene, and we discuss the differential diagnosis with other forms of hereditary ataxia.
- 1 August 2008
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Vol. 50 (8) , 631-634
Aicardi‐Goutières syndrome: description of a late onset case
Aicardi‐Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a genetically determined encephalopathy usually inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. The syndrome can be caused by mutations in the AGS1 gene encoding the exonuclease TREX1, or in any of the AGS2, AGS3, or AGS4 genes that encode the three subunits of the human ribonuclease H2 (RNaseH2) complex. Typically, AGS has an early onset, usually manifesting by the age of 4 months. We describe a female infant in whom the onset of the neurological symptoms of AGS occurred after the age of 12 months, and her younger brother who was identified to be affected by AGS at the age of 8 months on the basis of the presence of non‐neurological features alone. This paper is important in providing a detailed description of the late‐onset presentation of AGS in patients with proven pathogenic mutations and highlights the occurrence of both chilblains and abnormal neuroimaging many months before the onset of neurological features. Our paper also considers the possible value of immunomodulatory therapy in AGS.
- 1 August 2008
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Vol. 50 (8) , 631-634
Aicardi‐Goutières syndrome: description of a late onset case
Aicardi‐Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a genetically determined encephalopathy usually inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. The syndrome can be caused by mutations in the AGS1 gene encoding the exonuclease TREX1, or in any of the AGS2, AGS3, or AGS4 genes that encode the three subunits of the human ribonuclease H2 (RNaseH2) complex. Typically, AGS has an early onset, usually manifesting by the age of 4 months. We describe a female infant in whom the onset of the neurological symptoms of AGS occurred after the age of 12 months, and her younger brother who was identified to be affected by AGS at the age of 8 months on the basis of the presence of non‐neurological features alone. This paper is important in providing a detailed description of the late‐onset presentation of AGS in patients with proven pathogenic mutations and highlights the occurrence of both chilblains and abnormal neuroimaging many months before the onset of neurological features. Our paper also considers the possible value of immunomodulatory therapy in AGS.