Deborah Zion
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Deborah Zion has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Bebe Loff
3 shared publications- Linda Briskman
Western Sydney University
3 shared publications - Bebe Loff
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
1 shared publication Linda Briskman
Curtin University of Technology
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 March 2012
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ethics and Social Welfare
- Vol. 6 (1) , 37-55
Care or Collusion in Asylum Seeker Detention
This paper explores ethical questions arising from the work of health practitioners in immigration detention centres in Australia. It raises questions about the roles of professional disciplines and the ways in which they confront dual loyalty issues. The exploration is guided by interviews conducted with health professionals who have worked in asylum seeker detention and an examination of the outsider advocacy role undertaken by the social work profession. The paper discusses the stance taken by individuals and professional associations on participation in controlled settings, including as participant, bystander and advocate, and asks when the provision of care becomes collusion with oppression.
- 1 March 2012
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ethics and Social Welfare
- Vol. 6 (1) , 37-55
Care or Collusion in Asylum Seeker Detention
This paper explores ethical questions arising from the work of health practitioners in immigration detention centres in Australia. It raises questions about the roles of professional disciplines and the ways in which they confront dual loyalty issues. The exploration is guided by interviews conducted with health professionals who have worked in asylum seeker detention and an examination of the outsider advocacy role undertaken by the social work profession. The paper discusses the stance taken by individuals and professional associations on participation in controlled settings, including as participant, bystander and advocate, and asks when the provision of care becomes collusion with oppression.
- 3 February 2010
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 10 (2) , W6-W7
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia”
(2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia”. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. W6-W7.
- 3 February 2010
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 10 (2) , W6-W7
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia”
(2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia”. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. W6-W7.
- 3 February 2010
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 10 (2) , 48-56
Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia
Australia's policy of mandatory indefinite detention of those seeking asylum and arriving without valid documents has led to terrible human rights abuses and cumulative deterioration in health for those incarcerated. We argue that there is an imperative to research and document the plight of those who have suffered at the hands of the Australian government and its agents. However, the normal tools available to those engaged in health research may further erode the rights and well being of this population, requiring a rethink of existing research ethics paradigms to approaches that foster advocacy research and drawing on the voices of those directly affected, including those bestowed with duty of care for this population.
- 3 February 2010
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 10 (2) , 48-56
Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia
Australia's policy of mandatory indefinite detention of those seeking asylum and arriving without valid documents has led to terrible human rights abuses and cumulative deterioration in health for those incarcerated. We argue that there is an imperative to research and document the plight of those who have suffered at the hands of the Australian government and its agents. However, the normal tools available to those engaged in health research may further erode the rights and well being of this population, requiring a rethink of existing research ethics paradigms to approaches that foster advocacy research and drawing on the voices of those directly affected, including those bestowed with duty of care for this population.
- Open Access
- 28 August 2009
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 35 (9) , 546-551
Nursing in asylum seeker detention in Australia: care, rights and witnessing
The system of asylum seeker detention in Australia is one in which those seeking refuge are stripped of many of their rights, including the right to health. This presents serious ethical problems for healthcare providers working within this system. In this article we describe asylum seeker detention and analyse the role of nurses. We discuss how far an “ethics of care” and witnessing the suffering of asylum seekers can serve to improve their situation and improve ethical nursing practice.
- 28 August 2009
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 35 (9) , 546-551
Open AccessNursing in asylum seeker detention in Australia: care, rights and witnessing
The system of asylum seeker detention in Australia is one in which those seeking refuge are stripped of many of their rights, including the right to health. This presents serious ethical problems for healthcare providers working within this system. In this article we describe asylum seeker detention and analyse the role of nurses. We discuss how far an “ethics of care” and witnessing the suffering of asylum seekers can serve to improve their situation and improve ethical nursing practice.