Henk van Den Berg

Objective: Ewing sarcoma (EWS) of the mediastinum is extremely rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature. We aimed to gain a better understanding of primary mediastinal EWS, describing patients treated within two international, multicenter, prospective, randomized EWS trials. Methods: Data from patients with primary mediastinal EWS were retrieved from the database of the EURO-E.W.I.N.G.99 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00020566) and EWING 2008 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00987636) trials. Patient and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Results: Out of 2969 patients with EWS, 9 (0.3%) had primary mediastinal EWS. The median age at diagnosis was 30.5 years (4 to 49). At the time of diagnosis, n = 3 (33%) patients had synchronous metastases. All patients underwent multiagent chemotherapy. Local therapy for non-metastatic patients was surgery (n = 2, 22%), surgery and radiotherapy (n = 2, 22%) or radiotherapy alone (n = 2, 22%). Surgery consisted of extended resections in most patients (n = 3, 33%). Five-year survival for the whole cohort was 64%. Apart from one patient who was lost to follow-up, all patients (n = 4) who had undergone surgery were alive at the end of follow-up. Conclusions: Primary mediastinal ES is extremely rare, with a prevalence of 0.3% among EWS. Five-year survival was favorable compared to primary mediastinal sarcoma of all histologies and in line with EWS of different origin.

Intracranial Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is rare and publications on primary or metastatic intracranial EwS are minimal. The aim of this study was to describe incidence, clinical behavior, treatment, and factors associated with outcome in patients with primary intracranial EwS or patients with a primary extracranial EwS and cerebral metastases at diagnosis. We reviewed all patients with primary or with metastatic intracranial EwS at diagnosis registered in the International Clinical Trial Euro-E.W.I.N.G.99 (EE99). In total, 17 of 1435 patients (1.2%) presented with primary intracranial EwS; 3 of them had metastatic disease. Four patients (0.3%) with primary extracranial EwS presented with intracranial metastatic lesions. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 64% and overall survival (OS) was 70% in patients with a primary intracranial EwS. Local control in patients with primary intracranial EwS consisted of surgery (6%), radiotherapy (RT) (18%), or both modalities (76%). Univariate analysis showed that patients < 15 years of age had significantly better outcome (EFS: 72%; OS: 76%) compared to those aged above 15 years (EFS: 13%; OS: 25%). In conclusion, primary intracranial EwS and extracranial EwS with cerebral metastases at diagnosis is rare, yet survival is comparable with local and metastatic EwS elsewhere in the body. Age and stage of disease are important prognostic factors. Besides chemotherapeutic treatment, local control with surgical resection combined with RT is recommended whenever feasible.

Incidence of treatment related AML/MDS (t-AML/MDS) in children is extremely low. Consequently assessment of data from adults and to some extent extrapolation from adults is needed. Epipodophyllotoxin induced t-AML/MDS is more

Purpose. It is assumed that osteosarcomas of the jaws mainly occur at older ages, whereas the most prominent sites, that is, the long bones, are more affected at ages 60 years. Poorer outcome in older people is likely due to refraining from chemotherapy.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• High percentages of off‐label and unlicensed drug use are common in paediatrics.• Data in paediatric oncology patients hardly exist.• Extemporaneously prepared formulations are common.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• Off‐label and unlicensed use is substantially higher for cytostatic drugs in paediatric as compared with adult oncology.• Comparison with other paediatric reports on drug use cannot be made due to different percentages of diseases in the reports and other rules to dispense medication in the out‐patient setting.• There is an urgent need for suitable formulations, licensing of dosages and provision of data on safety and efficacy in children with malignancies.AIMPaediatric drug prescriptions are known for their high percentages of off‐label and unlicensed use. In paediatric oncology data available are scarce. The aim of this paper is an analysis of the licensing and labelling status of all prescribed medication over a 2 week period in a Dutch paediatric oncology centre.METHODSAn analysis of the delivery of medication by the hospital pharmacy to patients admitted to the paediatric oncology centre was carried out.RESULTSIn total 268 precriptions were filed for 39 patients. In 87% of children unlicensed medication was used. Fifty‐nine per cent of the children received at least two unlicensed drugs. In total 72% of the drugs were used licensed and on‐label was found in 57% of the prescriptions. There was a trend that in younger children percentages were lower. International and local guidelines necessitated in many cases unlicensed use, e.g. intrathecal prednisolone, low dose medication such as heparin, ethanol and vancomycin for locking intravenous devices and higher intravenous vancomycin dosages. There were no major differences with respect to type of malignancy.CONCLUSIONOur figures are substantially higher than the figures reported from adult oncology. Comparison with other paediatric reports are cumbersome, due to different percentages of diseases in the reports and other rules to dispense medication in the outpatient setting. Our data are in line with reports mentioning the higher percentages of unlicensed and off‐label use. Our data further underpin the need for more research on suitable formulations, dosages, safety and efficacy in these children.

Background: We report on the treatment of children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first relapse. The protocol focused on: (1) Intensive chemotherapy preceding allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in early bone marrow relapse; (2) Rotational chemotherapy in late relapse, without donor; (3) Postponement of cerebro‐spinal irradiation in late isolated CNS relapse; and (4) Treatment in very late bone marrow relapse with chemotherapy only.Methods: From January 1999 until July 2006 all 158 Dutch pediatric patients with ALL in first relapse were recorded. Ninety‐nine patients were eligible; 54 patients with early and 45 with late relapse. Eighteen patients had an isolated extra‐medullary relapse; 69 patients had bone marrow involvement only.Results: Five‐years EFS rates for early and late relapses were 12% and 35%, respectively. For early relapses 5 years EFSs were 25% for patients transplanted; 0% for non‐transplanted patients. For late relapses 5 years EFS was 64% for patients treated with chemotherapy only, and 16% for transplanted patients. For very late relapses EFS was 58%.Conclusions: Our data suggest the superiority of SCT for early relapse patients. For late relapses a better outcome is achieved with chemotherapy only using the rotational chemotherapy scheme. The most important factor for survival was interval between first CR and occurrence of the first relapse. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 57: 210–216.