Jochen Beyer

In recent years, derivatives of cathinone, a naturally occurring beta-keto phenylethylamine, have entered the illicit drug market. These compounds have been marketed over the internet or in so-called head shops as “legal highs” and have gained popularity among drug users. Numerous fatalities due to the abuse of these drugs in recent years have increased the need for their detection in human blood samples. For detection and determination of 25 designer cathinones and their related ephedrines in blood samples, a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) method was developed using only 100 µL of blood. The blood was extracted using liquid–liquid extraction with 1 mL of 1-chlorobutane containing 10% of isopropanol. The final extract was analyzed using a Shimadzu 8030 LC–MS-MS system operated in electrospray positive ionization multiple reaction monitoring mode. The method has been validated according to international guidelines and was found to be selective for all tested compounds. Calibration for all 25 studied analytes was satisfactory from 10–1,000 ng/mL. Accuracy data were within the acceptance interval of ±15% [±20% at the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)] of the nominal values for all drugs. Within-day (repeatability) and intermediate precision data were within the required limits of 15% relative standard deviation (RSD) (20% RSD at LLOQ).

Synthetic cannabinoids sprayed on herbal mixtures have been abused as a new designer drug all over the world since 2004. In 2008, the first compounds, CP 47,497 and JWH-018, were identified as active ingredients in these mixtures. Most of the compounds have been synthesized for research purposes and are potent CB1 and/or CB2 receptor agonists. To investigate the presence of synthetic cannabinoids in blood samples, a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) method was developed using only 100 µL of blood. After the addition of 0.2 mL of trizma buffer, the blood was extracted using liquid–liquid extraction with 1 mL of 1-chlorobutane containing 10% of isopropanol for 5 min on a shaker at 1,500 rpm. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 1 min, the separated solvent layer was transferred to an autosampler vial and evaporated to dryness under N₂. The residue was reconstituted in methanol and injected into a Shimadzu 8030 LC–MS-MS system to separate and detect 25 synthetic cannabinoids. The method has been validated according to international guidelines and was found to be selective for all tested compounds. Calibration was satisfactory from 0.5–100 ng/mL, and from 5.0–500 ng/mL. for HU-210, CP 47,497 and the CP 47,497 C-8 homolog, respectively. The extraction efficiencies ranged from 30–101% and the matrix effects from 67–112%. Accuracy data were within the acceptance interval of ±15% (±20% at the lower limit of quantification) of the nominal values for all drugs.

Detection of the alcohol metabolites ethylglucuronide (EtG) and ethylsulfate (EtS) has become routine in many forensic laboratories over the last few years. Most previously published methods using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry require a post-chromatographic addition of solvent and/or extensive sample preparation prior to analysis. The aim of the study was to develop a simplified method. To 20 μL urine, internal standard containing EtG-d5 and EtS-d ₅ was added and the mixture was treated with elution buffer internal standard. EtG and EtS were separated using a Shimadzu Prominence high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system with a C18 separation column (Restek Ultra Aqueous C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm), using isocratic elution with a mobile phase consisting of 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer pH 7 (total run time, 6 min). The compounds were detected using an Applied Biosystems API 5000 liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry system (atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, multiple-reaction monitoring mode). The method was fully validated according to international guidelines. The assay was found to be selective for the compounds of interest. It was linear from 0.1 to 10 mg/L for all analytes (R ² > 0.99). Matrix effects studies showed the presence of a slight but consistent ion enhancement (n = 10 different urine samples) at low concentrations and no effects at higher concentrations. Accuracy data were between 0.75% and 8.1% bias for EtG and between −5.0% and −11.3% bias for EtS. Precision data were between 4.3% and 6.9% relative standard deviations (RSD) for EtG and between 6.0% and 7.5% RSD for EtS. No instability was observed after repeated freezing and thawing. This fast, reliable, and accurate method enables the detection and quantification of alcohol metabolites in urine. The method is easier to use and more sensitive than previously published methods.

Legal and medical practitioners need to remember that, with respect to drug analysis, there are two distinct disciplines in analytical toxicology concerned with human biological matrices, namely clinical and forensic toxicology. Both fields use similar analytical techniques designed to detect and quantify drugs, chemicals and poisons in fluids or tissues. In clinical toxicology, analytical results help to specify the appropriate treatment of a poisoned or intoxicated patient. In forensic toxicology, the results often play a vital role in determining the possible impairment or behavioural changes in an individual, or the contribution of drugs or poisons to death in a medico-legal investigation. This column provides an overview of the similarities and differences inherent in clinical and forensic toxicology.

Over the last decade, the prescription rates of antipsychotic (AP) drugs have increased worldwide. Studies have shown that the risk of sudden cardiac death is threefold higher among patients treated with APs. To investigate the presence of APs in postmortem cases, a liquid chromatography (LC)‐MS/MS method was developed using only 0.1 ml of blood sample with 10 µl of internal standard (IS) (haloperidol‐d₄, 1 µg/ml). After the addition of 0.2 ml of Trizma buffer, the blood sample was extracted using liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) with 1 ml of 1‐chlorobutane for 5 min on a shaker at 1500 rpm. After centrifugation at 12 000 rpm for 1 min, the separated solvent layer was transferred to an autosampler vial and evaporated to dryness under N₂. The residue was reconstituted in 0.05 ml acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid, vortexed for 30 s and an additional 0.45 ml of 50 mmol/l ammonium formate pH 3.5 was added and the sample vortexed; 0.1 ml of the final extract was injected into a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system, with detection of drugs achieved using an Applied Biosystems 3200 Q‐TRAP^® LC‐MS/MS system equipped with a Turbo V ion source [electron spray ionization (ESI), multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode]. The method has been validated according to international guidelines and was found to be selective for all tested compounds. Calibration was satisfactory for all drugs, except olanzapine, from subtherapeutic to toxic concentrations. The lower limits of quantifications (LLOQs) corresponded to the lowest concentrations used for the calibration curves. With the exception of the lowest concentrations of bromperidol, buspirone and perphenazine, accuracy data were within the acceptance interval of ± 15% ( ± 20% at LLOQ) of the nominal values for all drugs. The method has been proven to be useful for the routine analysis of APs in postmortem blood samples. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Antipsychotic drugs are frequently associated with sudden death investigations. Detection of these drugs is necessary to establish their use and possible contribution to the death. LC–MS(MS) methods are common; however accurate and precise quantification is assured by using validated methods. This study compared extraction efficiency and matrix effects using common liquid–liquid and solid-phase extraction procedures in both ante-mortem and post-mortem specimen using LC–MS–MS. Extraction efficiencies and matrix effects were determined in five different blank blood specimens of each blood type. The samples were extracted using a number of different liquid–liquid extraction methods and compared with a standard mixed-mode solid-phase extraction method. Matrix effects were determined using a post-extraction addition approach—the blank blood specimens were extracted as described above and the extracts were reconstituted in mobile phase containing a known amount of analytes. The extraction comparison of ante-mortem and post-mortem blood showed considerable differences, in particular the extraction efficiency was quite different between ante-mortem and post-mortem blood. Quantitative methods used for determination of antipsychotic drugs in post-mortem blood should establish that there are no differences in extraction efficiency and matrix effects, particularly if using ante-mortem blood as calibrator.