Markus Völk

The two most frequently performed diagnostic X-ray examinations are those of the extremities and of the chest. Thus, dose reduction in the field of conventional skeletal and chest radiography is an important issue and there is a need to reduce man-made ionizing radiation. The large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide provides a significant reduction of radiation dose in skeletal and chest radiography compared with traditional imaging systems. This article describes the technical background and basic image quality parameters of this 43×43-cm digital system, and summarizes the available literature (years 2000–2003) concerning dose reduction in experimental and clinical studies. Due to its high detective quantum efficiency and dynamic range compared with traditional screen-film systems, a dose reduction of up to 50% is possible without loss of image quality.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and clinical acceptance of a large-area, flat-panel X-ray detector for routine skeleton examinations at 50% dose reduction. A total of 153 examinations (307 images) of 100 consecutive patients were evaluated. The cesium iodide-amorphous silicon active-matrix imager had a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, a matrix of 3000 x 3000, and a pixel pitch of 143 microm. All images were obtained with a kilovoltage setting identical to conventional radiographies of speed class 400. The amperage values were reduced by 50% compared with standard dose. Images were presented to 3 radiologists, who subjectively rated image quality on a 4-point scale according to 5 criteria (bone cortex, bone trabecula, soft tissue, overall contrast, and overall impression). Three trauma surgeons rated the clinical acceptance on a 4-point scale. Clinical acceptance was defined as directly derived consequences or therapy based on the presented image quality. For both evaluations, 1 represented excellent, 2 represented good, 3 represented moderate, and 4 represented nondiagnostic image quality/clinical acceptance. Intermediate scores at 0.5 intervals were allowed. The mean values for all 5 image quality criteria were rated good or excellent (< or = 2). A total of 4.2% (13 of 307) of the images were rated 2.5 to 3.5 concerning the overall impression. None of the imaging features was ranked more than 3.5 by any radiologist. The mean value of the clinical acceptance was between good and excellent (1.47). A total of 98.7% (151 of 153) of the examinations were rated < or = 2.5; 1.3% (2 of 153) of examinations were of moderate clinical acceptance (< or = 3.5). None of the examinations was of nondiagnostic image quality or clinical acceptance (>3.5); therefore, no study had to be repeated. Routine skeleton images with 50% dose reduction yield good image quality and good clinical acceptance. In cases with abundant soft tissue, less dose reduction or standard dose is required.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of composed long-leg examinations with a large-area, flat-panel x-ray detector. Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in this study. All images were obtained with a kilovoltage setting identical with conventional radiographies of speed class 400; amperage values were reduced by 50% compared with standard dose. After acquisition, the images were transferred to a workstation where the whole image was reconstructed using a generalized correlation method. Images were presented to 3 observers. Examination quality was ranked on a 3-point scale: 1 = no manual adjustment necessary; 2 = composition required manual correction; 3 = no composition possible. Patient rankings were 31/35 (88.6%) in category 1, 3/35 (8.6%) in category 2, and 1/35 (2.8%) in category 3 (primarily due to an application error). The analysis of the first clinical examinations of long-leg radiographies with a 43 cm × 43 cm flat-panel detector demonstrates very good reliability of the digital image composition.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a large-area, flat-panel X-ray detector for performing routine chest radiography at two different detector doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The chest radiographs of 50 patients (age range, 16-79 years; mean age, 57 years) were obtained at two different detector dose levels. Digital images were taken from the same patients in posteroanterior and lateral views with detector doses of 2.5 μGy and 1.8 μGy, respectively, at 125 kVp tube voltage. The cesium iodide—amorphous silicon active-matrix imager had a panel size of 43 × 43 cm, a matrix of 3000 × 3000, and a pixel pitch of 143 μm. Images were presented in a random order to three independent radiologists who were unaware of the dose level at which the images had been obtained. They subjectively rated image quality on a 4-point scale, according to six criteria (presentation of obscured lung, unobscured lung, airways, mediastinum and hilum, bony thorax, and overall impression). Statistical significance of differences was evaluated with Student's t test for paired samples (confidence level, 95%). RESULTS. Digital radiographs obtained at 2.5 and 1.8 μGy were equivalent on all quality criteria. No statistically significant differences and no tendency toward a preference for images obtained at one or the other dose level were observed. According to the registered mAs values, the average difference in patient dose was 33%. CONCLUSION. Use of flat-panel digital imagers based on the cesium iodide—amorphous silicon technique allows a considerable dose reduction during routine chest radiography without loss of image quality.

Results with different doses of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine were compared at magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was evaluated as a quantitative measure of image quality. Sixty consecutive patients (age range, 24-81 years; mean age, 65 years) underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material-enhanced time-resolved MR angiography. DSA was the standard of reference. Fifteen patients received gadopentetate dimeglumine at doses of 0.2 or 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight. Fifteen patients received gadobenate dimeglumine at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mmol/kg. The SNR was calculated in the aorta and both main renal arteries. The number and degree of stenoses of the renal arteries and accessory vessels were evaluated by four observers. SNRs with gadobenate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg were significantly superior to those with gadopentetate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Differences were not statistically significant between the SNRs in the other groups. Eleven (85%) of 13 hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses were detected correctly with MR angiography as were 22 (85%) of 26 accessory renal arteries. SNRs with gadobenate dimeglumine were higher than those with gadopentetate dimeglumine, but in most cases the differences in SNRs were not statistically significant.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.

To evaluate MR imaging features of commercially available stents before, during, and after in vitro deployment as a step toward MR-guided stent deployment. Fourteen stents were deployed in a phantom under MR monitoring at 1.5 T by using a gradient-echo sequence. Device visibility was rated on a four-point scale (excellent, fair, poor, not visible). The Memotherm stent and the rolling membrane (RM) Wallstent showed excellent stent visibility and at least fair scores for artifact-induced narrowing of the stent lumen. Three stents (Palmaz, AVE, Easy Wallstent) showed excellent visibility of the stent but no visible lumen. Five stents (Strecker, Accuflex, Hemobahn, Passager, Sinus) displayed fair visibility. The delivery catheters of four stent systems (Smart, Vascucoil, Symphony, ZA) displayed severe black hole artifacts. The imaging features of several stent systems might be suitable for MR-guided intervention. The Memotherm and the Wallstent RM combine good visibility of the stent and the lumen.

To assess the diagnostic performance of an active-matrix flat-panel x-ray detector for reduced-dose imaging of simulated arthritic lesions. A digital x-ray detector based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon technology with a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, matrix of 3,000 x 3,000 pixels, pixel size of 143 micrometer, and digital output of 14 bits was used. State-of-the-art screen-film radiographs were compared with digital images obtained at doses equivalent to those obtained with system speeds of 400, 560, and 800. The phantom was composed of a human hand skeleton on an acrylic plate with drilled holes simulating bone erosions of different diameters and depths. Results of four independent observers were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector resulted in better diagnostic performance than did the screen-film combination, with the dose being the same for both modalities (P <.05). For digital images obtained at reduced doses, no significant differences were found. The improved diagnostic performance with digital radiographs obtained with the cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector suggests that this detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction for specific diagnostic tasks, without loss of diagnostic accuracy.

The authors evaluate a new flat-panel x-ray detector (FD) with respect to foreign body detection and reduction of radiation dose compared with screen-film radiography. Flat-panel x-ray detector is based on amorphous silicon technology and uses a 1 k x 1 k photo-detector matrix with a pixel size of 143 x 143 microns and 12-bit digital output. A thallium-dotted cesium iodide scintillation layer converts x-rays into light. An ex vivo experimental model was used to determine the detectability of foreign bodies. Foreign bodies with varying sizes were examined: glass with and without addition of lead, bone, aluminium, iron, copper, gravel fragments, and graphite. Four hundred observation fields were examined using conventional radiography (speed, 400; system dose: 2.5 microGy) as well as FD with a simulated speed of 400, 800, 1200, and 1600, corresponding to a detector dose of 2.5 microGy, 1.25 microGy, 0.87 microGy, and 0.625 microGy, respectively. Four independent radiologists performed receiver operating characteristic analysis of 8000 observations. Flat-panel x-ray detector with a simulated speed of 400 was significantly superior (P = 0.012) to screen-film radiography (speed, 400). At a simulated speed of 800 and 1200 FD yielded results equivalent to screen-film radiography. Flat-panel x-ray detector was significantly inferior to screen-film radiography at a simulated speed of 1600 (P = 0.012). Flat-panel x-ray detector technology allows significant reduction in radiation dose compared with screen-film radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy.