Lisa A. Shipley
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lisa A. Shipley has a total of 278 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bohdan Konôpka
National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 2175/22, SK-960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia
2 shared publications - Iver T. Hull
School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
2 shared publications - Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, USA
2 shared publications - Jozef Pajtík
National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 2175/22, SK-960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia
2 shared publications - Vladimír Šebeň
National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 2175/22, SK-960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia
2 shared publications - Adam J. Sepulveda
U.S. Geological Survey Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center Bozeman Montana USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Use of Leg-Mounted Monitors to Assess the Effects of Treponeme-Associated Hoof Disease on Elk (Cervus canadensis) Activity
Treponeme-associated hoof disease (TAHD) is an emerging disease of free-ranging elk (Cervus canadensis) in the northwestern United States. Affected elk develop chronic foot lesions, lameness, debilitation, and an apparent increase in mortality, but the onset of lameness and associated changes in activity are not fully understood. We evaluated the accuracy of a newly developed leg-mounted tri-axial accelerometer monitor (Advanced Telemetry Systems) on captive elk and collected monitor-derived data to assess activity before and during an experimental TAHD challenge. Monitors provided reliable data with 85% overall accuracy of the continuous onboard classification of activity as standing, moving, or bedded against direct visual observation using seven healthy elk. Further, following TAHD challenge, monitor-derived data were able to detect that treatment elk exhibiting abnormal locomotion spent more time bedded and less time moving or standing. During the challenge period, treatment elk spent roughly 10% more of the day bedded than control elk. These findings suggest that leg-mounted activity monitors can detect changes in elk activity and may serve as a useful tool for future wildlife disease monitoring efforts.
Open AccessUse of Leg-Mounted Monitors to Assess the Effects of Treponeme-Associated Hoof Disease on Elk (Cervus canadensis) Activity
Treponeme-associated hoof disease (TAHD) is an emerging disease of free-ranging elk (Cervus canadensis) in the northwestern United States. Affected elk develop chronic foot lesions, lameness, debilitation, and an apparent increase in mortality, but the onset of lameness and associated changes in activity are not fully understood. We evaluated the accuracy of a newly developed leg-mounted tri-axial accelerometer monitor (Advanced Telemetry Systems) on captive elk and collected monitor-derived data to assess activity before and during an experimental TAHD challenge. Monitors provided reliable data with 85% overall accuracy of the continuous onboard classification of activity as standing, moving, or bedded against direct visual observation using seven healthy elk. Further, following TAHD challenge, monitor-derived data were able to detect that treatment elk exhibiting abnormal locomotion spent more time bedded and less time moving or standing. During the challenge period, treatment elk spent roughly 10% more of the day bedded than control elk. These findings suggest that leg-mounted activity monitors can detect changes in elk activity and may serve as a useful tool for future wildlife disease monitoring efforts.
- Open Access
- 5 March 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 17 (5) , 915
Classifying Rocky Land Cover Using Random Forest Modeling: Lessons Learned and Potential Applications in Washington, USA
Rocky land cover provides vital habitat for many different species, including endemic, vulnerable, or threatened plants and animals; thus, various land management organizations prioritize the conservation of rocky habitat. Despite its importance, land cover classification maps rarely classify rocky land cover explicitly, and if they do, they are limited in spatial resolution or extent. Consequently, we used random forest models in Google Earth Engine (GEE) to classify rocky land cover at a high spatial resolution across a broad spatial extent in the Cascade Mountains and Columbia River Gorge in Washington, USA. The spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2 satellite data and NAIP aerial imagery, the specialized multi-temporal predictors formulated using time series of normalized burn ratio (NBR) and normalized difference in vegetation index (NDVI), and topographical predictors were especially important to include in the rocky land cover classification models; however, the predictors’ relative variable importance differed regionally. Beyond evaluating random forest models and developing classification maps of rocky land cover, we conducted three case studies to highlight potential avenues for future work and form connections to land management organizations’ needs. Our replicable approach relies on open-source data and software (GEE), aligns with the goals of land management organizations, and has the potential to be elaborated upon by future research investigating rocky habitats or other rare habitat types.
- 5 March 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 17 (5) , 915
Open AccessClassifying Rocky Land Cover Using Random Forest Modeling: Lessons Learned and Potential Applications in Washington, USA
Rocky land cover provides vital habitat for many different species, including endemic, vulnerable, or threatened plants and animals; thus, various land management organizations prioritize the conservation of rocky habitat. Despite its importance, land cover classification maps rarely classify rocky land cover explicitly, and if they do, they are limited in spatial resolution or extent. Consequently, we used random forest models in Google Earth Engine (GEE) to classify rocky land cover at a high spatial resolution across a broad spatial extent in the Cascade Mountains and Columbia River Gorge in Washington, USA. The spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2 satellite data and NAIP aerial imagery, the specialized multi-temporal predictors formulated using time series of normalized burn ratio (NBR) and normalized difference in vegetation index (NDVI), and topographical predictors were especially important to include in the rocky land cover classification models; however, the predictors’ relative variable importance differed regionally. Beyond evaluating random forest models and developing classification maps of rocky land cover, we conducted three case studies to highlight potential avenues for future work and form connections to land management organizations’ needs. Our replicable approach relies on open-source data and software (GEE), aligns with the goals of land management organizations, and has the potential to be elaborated upon by future research investigating rocky habitats or other rare habitat types.
- Open Access
Influence of Tree Species and Size on Bark Browsing by Large Wild Herbivores
Although an important part of the ecosystem, large wild herbivores (LWH), especially red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), cause significant damage to economically valuable timber in forests of Central Europe. Recent work has demonstrated that less valuable softwood broadleaved trees can act as “biological control” that helps reduce bark browsing on more valuable trees in a mixed stand. To better understand the factors that influence how much bark area and mass are removed by LWH from these broadleaved trees, we took advantage of a novel “natural” experiment that occurred after a breach in a herbivory exclosure surrounding a 10-year old mixed broadleaved/conifer stand in the Western Carpathians in north-western Slovakia. We measured the area of old (up to 2 years previously) and new browsed patches on stems of common aspen (Populus tremula L.), common rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) and goat willow (Salix caprea L.), and their position along the vertical profile of the stem. The browsed bark area (cm2) was then converted to the bark mass (g) removed and the proportion of browsed bark to total bark (%) using conversion equations. Our models demonstrated that the amount of bark removed was influenced by tree species, stem diameter, age of browsing (old vs. new), and stem section along the vertical profile. LWH removed the most bark area from willow but the most bark mass from aspen because aspen had thicker bark than the other tree species. Bark browsing was greater on trees > 6 cm basal diameter. The distribution of bark browsing along the vertical profile was symmetrical (unimodal) with maximum intensity at 101–125 cm from the ground, which corresponds with the height most optimal for feeding by red deer. However, previous browsing in 2019 and 2020 caused new browsing on willow in 2021 to be focused in stem sections lower (51–75 cm) and higher (126–150 cm) than that optima. By quantifying browsing patterns and the amount of bark that is accessible to LWH for forage on the most attractive softwood broadleaved trees, our work will contribute to developing better methods for protecting commercially important species such as European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) in areas of Central Europe that are greatly affected by increasing population density of LWH, especially red deer.
Open AccessInfluence of Tree Species and Size on Bark Browsing by Large Wild Herbivores
Although an important part of the ecosystem, large wild herbivores (LWH), especially red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), cause significant damage to economically valuable timber in forests of Central Europe. Recent work has demonstrated that less valuable softwood broadleaved trees can act as “biological control” that helps reduce bark browsing on more valuable trees in a mixed stand. To better understand the factors that influence how much bark area and mass are removed by LWH from these broadleaved trees, we took advantage of a novel “natural” experiment that occurred after a breach in a herbivory exclosure surrounding a 10-year old mixed broadleaved/conifer stand in the Western Carpathians in north-western Slovakia. We measured the area of old (up to 2 years previously) and new browsed patches on stems of common aspen (Populus tremula L.), common rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) and goat willow (Salix caprea L.), and their position along the vertical profile of the stem. The browsed bark area (cm2) was then converted to the bark mass (g) removed and the proportion of browsed bark to total bark (%) using conversion equations. Our models demonstrated that the amount of bark removed was influenced by tree species, stem diameter, age of browsing (old vs. new), and stem section along the vertical profile. LWH removed the most bark area from willow but the most bark mass from aspen because aspen had thicker bark than the other tree species. Bark browsing was greater on trees > 6 cm basal diameter. The distribution of bark browsing along the vertical profile was symmetrical (unimodal) with maximum intensity at 101–125 cm from the ground, which corresponds with the height most optimal for feeding by red deer. However, previous browsing in 2019 and 2020 caused new browsing on willow in 2021 to be focused in stem sections lower (51–75 cm) and higher (126–150 cm) than that optima. By quantifying browsing patterns and the amount of bark that is accessible to LWH for forage on the most attractive softwood broadleaved trees, our work will contribute to developing better methods for protecting commercially important species such as European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) in areas of Central Europe that are greatly affected by increasing population density of LWH, especially red deer.
- Open Access
Excluding Large Wild Herbivores Reduced Norway Spruce Dominance and Supported Tree Species Richness in a Young, Naturally Regenerated Stand
Large wild herbivores are important and natural components of forest ecosystems, but through their browsing activities have the potential to influence the structure and composition of forest communities, thus timber production and ecosystem dynamics. To examine the effects of browsing by wild herbivores on a young post-disturbance forest in the Kysuce region of northwestern Slovakia, we established two sets of 2 m radius plots, 15 within a fenced area (5.12 ha) that excluded large wild herbivores, and 15 within an adjacent unfenced area. In each plot, we recorded the species, tree height, stem base diameter, and mutual geographic positions of trees. When we compared tree community characteristics between the unfenced and fenced plots, we found fewer and smaller broadleaved tree species, except silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) in the unfenced plots. Although common rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) was the dominant species within fenced plots, where some individuals were over 6.0 m tall, this species was rare outside the fenced area and usually did not exceed 1.5 m. In contrast, Norway spruce (Picea abies Karts L.) was more abundant and taller within the unfenced area, likely released from competition by suppression of broadleaved trees by herbivores. In addition, fenced plots also showed twice the tree species richness (Shannon index) of unfenced ones. Despite changes in tree communities, total aboveground biomass stock was only slightly but significantly lower in the unfenced than the fenced plots (29.6 kg per 10 m2 vs. 33.5 kg per 10 m2). Our study suggested that browsing pressure by large wild herbivores that focused on most broadleaved trees weakened interspecies competition and allowed the expansion of Norway spruce. As a consequence, converting spruce monocultures to mixed species stands is likely unrealistic when faced with heavy browsing pressure by wild large herbivores.
Open AccessExcluding Large Wild Herbivores Reduced Norway Spruce Dominance and Supported Tree Species Richness in a Young, Naturally Regenerated Stand
Large wild herbivores are important and natural components of forest ecosystems, but through their browsing activities have the potential to influence the structure and composition of forest communities, thus timber production and ecosystem dynamics. To examine the effects of browsing by wild herbivores on a young post-disturbance forest in the Kysuce region of northwestern Slovakia, we established two sets of 2 m radius plots, 15 within a fenced area (5.12 ha) that excluded large wild herbivores, and 15 within an adjacent unfenced area. In each plot, we recorded the species, tree height, stem base diameter, and mutual geographic positions of trees. When we compared tree community characteristics between the unfenced and fenced plots, we found fewer and smaller broadleaved tree species, except silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) in the unfenced plots. Although common rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) was the dominant species within fenced plots, where some individuals were over 6.0 m tall, this species was rare outside the fenced area and usually did not exceed 1.5 m. In contrast, Norway spruce (Picea abies Karts L.) was more abundant and taller within the unfenced area, likely released from competition by suppression of broadleaved trees by herbivores. In addition, fenced plots also showed twice the tree species richness (Shannon index) of unfenced ones. Despite changes in tree communities, total aboveground biomass stock was only slightly but significantly lower in the unfenced than the fenced plots (29.6 kg per 10 m2 vs. 33.5 kg per 10 m2). Our study suggested that browsing pressure by large wild herbivores that focused on most broadleaved trees weakened interspecies competition and allowed the expansion of Norway spruce. As a consequence, converting spruce monocultures to mixed species stands is likely unrealistic when faced with heavy browsing pressure by wild large herbivores.
- Open Access
Differences in dietary niche and foraging behavior of sympatric mule and white‐tailed deer
Mule (Odocoileus hemionus) and white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are congeneric and share similar life histories, yet their distribution is segregated across much of North America. Extensive research on both species within and outside their zone of co‐occurrence has not fully explained these distribution patterns, especially the potential role of diet and foraging behavior. Therefore, we used a common garden experiment to compare diet composition, diet quality, foraging behavior, and intake of tractable mule and white‐tailed deer foraging together within the dry Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)/ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests of northeastern Washington. We sampled at 21 0.5‐ha sites from June to August 2016. We used standard bite count techniques coupled with forage biomass sampling, behavioral observations, and nutritional analyses to compare the foraging ecology of the two species. Mule and white‐tailed deer had similar activity patterns. However, mule deer took larger bites and harvested food faster than white‐tailed deer, and white‐tailed deer consumed more diverse but higher‐quality diets than mule deer. These differences resulted in mule deer acquiring ~25% more dry matter and digestible energy per day. About 90% of the diets consumed by both deer species consisted of deciduous shrubs and forbs, and they selected many of the same plant species. However, overall diet composition was 38% dissimilar, with mule deer consuming diets that were more likely to contain shrubs with higher levels of tannins and lower levels of dry matter digestibility than diets eaten by white‐tailed deer. Dietary overlap was greatest at both very low and very high forage biomass, indicating potential for modest resource competition or partitioning. Our research provides evidence that differences in diet composition of mule and white‐tailed deer do not merely reflect differences in habitat selection, but also suggest the species differ in their fundamental nutritional niches.
Open AccessDifferences in dietary niche and foraging behavior of sympatric mule and white‐tailed deer
Mule (Odocoileus hemionus) and white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are congeneric and share similar life histories, yet their distribution is segregated across much of North America. Extensive research on both species within and outside their zone of co‐occurrence has not fully explained these distribution patterns, especially the potential role of diet and foraging behavior. Therefore, we used a common garden experiment to compare diet composition, diet quality, foraging behavior, and intake of tractable mule and white‐tailed deer foraging together within the dry Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)/ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests of northeastern Washington. We sampled at 21 0.5‐ha sites from June to August 2016. We used standard bite count techniques coupled with forage biomass sampling, behavioral observations, and nutritional analyses to compare the foraging ecology of the two species. Mule and white‐tailed deer had similar activity patterns. However, mule deer took larger bites and harvested food faster than white‐tailed deer, and white‐tailed deer consumed more diverse but higher‐quality diets than mule deer. These differences resulted in mule deer acquiring ~25% more dry matter and digestible energy per day. About 90% of the diets consumed by both deer species consisted of deciduous shrubs and forbs, and they selected many of the same plant species. However, overall diet composition was 38% dissimilar, with mule deer consuming diets that were more likely to contain shrubs with higher levels of tannins and lower levels of dry matter digestibility than diets eaten by white‐tailed deer. Dietary overlap was greatest at both very low and very high forage biomass, indicating potential for modest resource competition or partitioning. Our research provides evidence that differences in diet composition of mule and white‐tailed deer do not merely reflect differences in habitat selection, but also suggest the species differ in their fundamental nutritional niches.
- 18 July 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Forestry
- Vol. 117 (5) , 492-503
Testing the Ability of Airborne LiDAR to Measure Forage Resources for Wild Ungulates in Conifer Forests
Vegetation in the forest understory is a key food resource for wild ungulates like deer (Odocoileus spp.) because the amount of nutritious forage influences animal productivity and density. Therefore, measuring the abundance of understory vegetation available to wildlife populations is often a key objective for wildlife managers. Field-based methods for measuring understory vegetation across remote landscapes are time- and resource-intensive, so we compared estimates of understory vegetation density derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) returns with vegetation biomass sampled directly on 65 field plots across 4 years and >250,000 hectares of xeric conifer forests in northeastern Washington. We found that LiDAR-derived estimates of understory vegetation density were only able to predict field-sampled vegetation biomass when the two sampling methods occurred within 3 years of each other, and overstory canopy cover was <50 percent. Our results demonstrate limitations in the ability of LiDAR, at the intensity and frequency currently applied for multiuse purposes, to measure the quantity of forage. However, further testing with synchronous field sampling and higher-density laser pulses holds promise.
- 18 July 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Forestry
- Vol. 117 (5) , 492-503
Testing the Ability of Airborne LiDAR to Measure Forage Resources for Wild Ungulates in Conifer Forests
Vegetation in the forest understory is a key food resource for wild ungulates like deer (Odocoileus spp.) because the amount of nutritious forage influences animal productivity and density. Therefore, measuring the abundance of understory vegetation available to wildlife populations is often a key objective for wildlife managers. Field-based methods for measuring understory vegetation across remote landscapes are time- and resource-intensive, so we compared estimates of understory vegetation density derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) returns with vegetation biomass sampled directly on 65 field plots across 4 years and >250,000 hectares of xeric conifer forests in northeastern Washington. We found that LiDAR-derived estimates of understory vegetation density were only able to predict field-sampled vegetation biomass when the two sampling methods occurred within 3 years of each other, and overstory canopy cover was <50 percent. Our results demonstrate limitations in the ability of LiDAR, at the intensity and frequency currently applied for multiuse purposes, to measure the quantity of forage. However, further testing with synchronous field sampling and higher-density laser pulses holds promise.
- 1 July 2019
- Published by Northwestern Naturalist in Northwestern Naturalist
- Vol. 100 (2) , 132-164
ABSTRACTS FROM THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY FOR NORTHWESTERN VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY, HELD JOINTLY WITH THE WASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY, AND IN ASSOCIATION WITH NORTHWEST PARTNERS IN AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE CONSERVATION, AT GREAT WOLF LODGE, GRAND MOUND, WASHINGTON, 25 FEBRUARY–1 M
In the absence of a text abstract the first page of the article is provided. Sorry, your browser doesn't support embedded PDFs, Download First Page
- 1 July 2019
- Published by Northwestern Naturalist in Northwestern Naturalist
- Vol. 100 (2) , 132-164
ABSTRACTS FROM THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY FOR NORTHWESTERN VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY, HELD JOINTLY WITH THE WASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY, AND IN ASSOCIATION WITH NORTHWEST PARTNERS IN AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE CONSERVATION, AT GREAT WOLF LODGE, GRAND MOUND, WASHINGTON, 25 FEBRUARY–1 M
In the absence of a text abstract the first page of the article is provided. Sorry, your browser doesn't support embedded PDFs, Download First Page
- 11 April 2013
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Vol. 77 (5) , 897-907
Spring cattle grazing and mule deer nutrition in a bluebunch wheatgrass community
Although domestic cattle and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) share bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) communities throughout western United States and Canada, no study has yet evaluated the effects of cattle grazing on the nutrient intake of mule deer and the nutritional carrying capacity in these semi‐arid rangelands. We expected that spring cattle grazing would decrease plant biomass available to deer but increase the nutritional quality of forage by arresting the phenology of grasses, reducing the proportion of standing dead biomass of grasses and promoting forbs. Using 0.4‐ha exclosures, we created 3 replicates of paired grazed and non‐grazed treatments within 3 pastures ranging from 64 to 509 ha in bluebunch wheatgrass communities on dry‐stony ecological sites in southeastern Washington, USA. After cattle had grazed 1 of each pair of 0.4‐ha plots to 40% utilization from 10 April to 29 May 2009, we sampled the biomass and measured the digestible energy (DE; kJ/g) and digestible protein (g/100 g feed) of plants that spring and fall. Using hand‐raised, tractable mule deer, bite count methods, and behavioral observations, we measured daily DE and digestible protein intake within each plot. When compared to non‐grazed plots, grazed plots had half the total and 3 times less live plant biomass in spring, and 25% less biomass in fall, whereas DE content of bluebunch wheatgrass and mule deer diets did not differ between grazing treatments. However, daily DE intake of deer was 39% less in spring and 13% less in fall in grazed than non‐grazed plots. Nutritional carrying capacity (deer days/ha) did not vary between grazing treatments except for 1 pasture in fall, indicating that spring grazing by cattle in bluebunch wheatgrass communities did not improve the nutritional quality of deer diets enough to offset the overall loss of live forage biomass. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
- 11 April 2013
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Vol. 77 (5) , 897-907
Spring cattle grazing and mule deer nutrition in a bluebunch wheatgrass community
Although domestic cattle and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) share bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) communities throughout western United States and Canada, no study has yet evaluated the effects of cattle grazing on the nutrient intake of mule deer and the nutritional carrying capacity in these semi‐arid rangelands. We expected that spring cattle grazing would decrease plant biomass available to deer but increase the nutritional quality of forage by arresting the phenology of grasses, reducing the proportion of standing dead biomass of grasses and promoting forbs. Using 0.4‐ha exclosures, we created 3 replicates of paired grazed and non‐grazed treatments within 3 pastures ranging from 64 to 509 ha in bluebunch wheatgrass communities on dry‐stony ecological sites in southeastern Washington, USA. After cattle had grazed 1 of each pair of 0.4‐ha plots to 40% utilization from 10 April to 29 May 2009, we sampled the biomass and measured the digestible energy (DE; kJ/g) and digestible protein (g/100 g feed) of plants that spring and fall. Using hand‐raised, tractable mule deer, bite count methods, and behavioral observations, we measured daily DE and digestible protein intake within each plot. When compared to non‐grazed plots, grazed plots had half the total and 3 times less live plant biomass in spring, and 25% less biomass in fall, whereas DE content of bluebunch wheatgrass and mule deer diets did not differ between grazing treatments. However, daily DE intake of deer was 39% less in spring and 13% less in fall in grazed than non‐grazed plots. Nutritional carrying capacity (deer days/ha) did not vary between grazing treatments except for 1 pasture in fall, indicating that spring grazing by cattle in bluebunch wheatgrass communities did not improve the nutritional quality of deer diets enough to offset the overall loss of live forage biomass. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
- 1 September 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Vol. 38 (9) , 1178-1189
Mechanisms for Eliminating Monoterpenes of Sagebrush by Specialist and Generalist Rabbits
Pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) are one of only three vertebrates that subsist virtually exclusively on sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), which contains high levels of monoterpenes that can be toxic. We examined the mechanisms used by specialist pygmy rabbits to eliminate 1,8-cineole, a monoterpene of sagebrush, and compared them with those of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus nuttalli), a generalist herbivore. Rabbits were offered food pellets with increasing concentrations of cineole, and we measured voluntary intake and excretion of cineole metabolites in feces and urine. We expected pygmy rabbits to consume more, but excrete cineole more rapidly by using less-energetically expensive methods of detoxification than cottontails. Pygmy rabbits consumed 3–5 times more cineole than cottontails relative to their metabolic body mass, and excreted up to 2 times more cineole metabolites in their urine than did cottontails. Urinary metabolites excreted by pygmy rabbits were 20 % more highly-oxidized and 6 times less-conjugated than those of cottontails. Twenty percent of all cineole metabolites recovered from pygmy rabbits were in feces, whereas cottontails did not excrete fecal metabolites. When compared to other mammals that consume cineole, pygmy rabbits voluntarily consumed more, and excreted more cineole metabolites in feces, but they excreted less oxidized and more conjugated cineole metabolites in urine. Pygmy rabbits seem to have a greater capacity to minimize systemic exposure to cineole than do cottontails, and other cineole-consumers, by minimizing absorption and maximizing detoxification of ingested cineole. However, mechanisms that lower systemic exposure to cineole may come with a higher energetic cost in pygmy rabbits than in other mammalian herbivores.
- 1 September 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Vol. 38 (9) , 1178-1189
Mechanisms for Eliminating Monoterpenes of Sagebrush by Specialist and Generalist Rabbits
Pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) are one of only three vertebrates that subsist virtually exclusively on sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), which contains high levels of monoterpenes that can be toxic. We examined the mechanisms used by specialist pygmy rabbits to eliminate 1,8-cineole, a monoterpene of sagebrush, and compared them with those of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus nuttalli), a generalist herbivore. Rabbits were offered food pellets with increasing concentrations of cineole, and we measured voluntary intake and excretion of cineole metabolites in feces and urine. We expected pygmy rabbits to consume more, but excrete cineole more rapidly by using less-energetically expensive methods of detoxification than cottontails. Pygmy rabbits consumed 3–5 times more cineole than cottontails relative to their metabolic body mass, and excreted up to 2 times more cineole metabolites in their urine than did cottontails. Urinary metabolites excreted by pygmy rabbits were 20 % more highly-oxidized and 6 times less-conjugated than those of cottontails. Twenty percent of all cineole metabolites recovered from pygmy rabbits were in feces, whereas cottontails did not excrete fecal metabolites. When compared to other mammals that consume cineole, pygmy rabbits voluntarily consumed more, and excreted more cineole metabolites in feces, but they excreted less oxidized and more conjugated cineole metabolites in urine. Pygmy rabbits seem to have a greater capacity to minimize systemic exposure to cineole than do cottontails, and other cineole-consumers, by minimizing absorption and maximizing detoxification of ingested cineole. However, mechanisms that lower systemic exposure to cineole may come with a higher energetic cost in pygmy rabbits than in other mammalian herbivores.
- Open Access
- 23 June 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Vol. 49 (3) , 274-290
Revisiting the dietary niche: When is a mammalian herbivore a specialist?
Understanding dietary specialization in herbivores has theoretical and practical implications in ecology, yet defining niche breadth consistently has been problematic. To increase clarity and communication among ecologists and among disciplines (i.e., chemists, pharmacologists), we propose a specialization key for mammalian herbivores that assigns “obligatory” and “facultative” modifiers to the terms “specialist” and “generalist”. These modifiers are assigned based on (1) relative breadth of the animal's realized niche and diet (what it eats), (2) relative breadth of the fundamental niche and available diet (what it could eat), (3) the extent of chemical or physical characteristics, termed “difficulty”, that make food items either low in value or unpalatable to most herbivores, and (4) relevant temporal and spatial scales at which diets and niche breadth were measured. Obligatory specialists always have a narrow realized niche consisting of difficult food items, and morphological adaptations and/or the loss of redundant behavioral flexibility that effectively limit their fundamental niches, precluding them from expanding their diet under changed environmental conditions. Facultative specialists have a consistently narrow realized niche for difficult foods during at least one spatial or temporal scale, but have a broad enough fundamental niche to allow them to expand their diet to include less difficult foods when environmental conditions allow. Facultative generalists have the broadest fundamental niche, allowing them to consume a wide variety of foods. However, they may occasionally demonstrate a narrow realized niche, focused on less difficult plants than is the case with specialists. Finally, the obligatory generalists always have a wide realized niche because of a relatively narrow fundamental niche, precluding them from eating much of any difficult plant. We summarize hypothesized characteristics of mammalian herbivores in each of the four categories of specialization. We demonstrate the need for further work on defining the realized and fundamental niches, comparing among herbivores across categories conducted under similar conditions, and understanding the nature of trade-offs required for specialization and generalization for both community and phylogenetically based analyses.
- 23 June 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Vol. 49 (3) , 274-290
Open AccessRevisiting the dietary niche: When is a mammalian herbivore a specialist?
Understanding dietary specialization in herbivores has theoretical and practical implications in ecology, yet defining niche breadth consistently has been problematic. To increase clarity and communication among ecologists and among disciplines (i.e., chemists, pharmacologists), we propose a specialization key for mammalian herbivores that assigns “obligatory” and “facultative” modifiers to the terms “specialist” and “generalist”. These modifiers are assigned based on (1) relative breadth of the animal's realized niche and diet (what it eats), (2) relative breadth of the fundamental niche and available diet (what it could eat), (3) the extent of chemical or physical characteristics, termed “difficulty”, that make food items either low in value or unpalatable to most herbivores, and (4) relevant temporal and spatial scales at which diets and niche breadth were measured. Obligatory specialists always have a narrow realized niche consisting of difficult food items, and morphological adaptations and/or the loss of redundant behavioral flexibility that effectively limit their fundamental niches, precluding them from expanding their diet under changed environmental conditions. Facultative specialists have a consistently narrow realized niche for difficult foods during at least one spatial or temporal scale, but have a broad enough fundamental niche to allow them to expand their diet to include less difficult foods when environmental conditions allow. Facultative generalists have the broadest fundamental niche, allowing them to consume a wide variety of foods. However, they may occasionally demonstrate a narrow realized niche, focused on less difficult plants than is the case with specialists. Finally, the obligatory generalists always have a wide realized niche because of a relatively narrow fundamental niche, precluding them from eating much of any difficult plant. We summarize hypothesized characteristics of mammalian herbivores in each of the four categories of specialization. We demonstrate the need for further work on defining the realized and fundamental niches, comparing among herbivores across categories conducted under similar conditions, and understanding the nature of trade-offs required for specialization and generalization for both community and phylogenetically based analyses.