Edward S Newlands

5086 Background: Elevated serum beta human chronic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) not due to pregnancy can occur as a consequence of (1) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) (2) non-gestational trophoblastic tumours, (3) false positive, often associated with heterophilic antibodies, (4) during the menopause, and (5) it may represent a high normal level. The accurate differentiation between these causes is vital to avoid potentially inappropriate investigations and therapies which may induce infertility or other serious adverse events. Here we report the United Kingdom experience of patients with an elevated β-hCG where the cause was initially uncertain and provide a clinical algorithm for the management of such cases. Method: The Charing Cross and Sheffield GTD database was screened between 1981–2004 to identify patients referred with an elevated β-hCG in the absence of a previous diagnosis of GTD and who were not pregnant. Results: Between 1981–2004 fourteen women were referred with persistently raised serum β-hCG which presented diagnostic problems. False positive β-hCG was excluded in all 14 cases (13 had positive urine β-hCG and all had samples that serially diluted consistent with genuine hormone). Three subsequently developed gestational trophoblastic tumours after 6–17 months. These were detected by rising β-hCG levels, positive imaging and in 2 cases by a change in hyperglycosylated β-hCG. All 3 were cured with chemotherapy. In the other 11 cases no cause for the persistently elevated β-hCG has been found (follow-up 7- 201 months), in 7 of these cases there was surgical intervention and/or chemotherapy administered without benefit. Cases will be used to highlight the problems faced and a protocol proposed for the management of healthy women with persistently elevated β-hCG based on our clinical experience. Conclusion: The finding of an elevated serum and urinary β-hCG in healthy women should be investigated in a systematic manner to exclude an underlying malignant process and also to avoid inappropriate surgical and medical intervention. Close follow up is required of these cases as a tumour may not become apparent until many months or years after the initial referral and investigations have been carried out.: No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent with a good safety profile and proven efficacy in the treatment of malignant glioma. Procarbazine (PCB) has been used for treating gliomas for many years and here both agents were combined in the treatment. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TMZ alone (course 1) and TMZ in combination with PCB in subsequent courses in chemotherapy-naïve patients with malignant glioma. Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and low-grade glioma were treated with TMZ 200 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 on a 28-day cycle for course 1. Beginning with course 2, cohorts of patients received TMZ at full dose with escalating doses of PCB (50/75/100/125 mg m(-2) days 1-5 given 1 h prior to TMZ). A total of 28 patients were enrolled with three patients each at dose level 1 and 2, 16 patients at dose level 3 and six patients at dose level 4 received 182+ cycles of treatment and were included in this analysis. In all, 16 patients had GBM, seven patients had AA, five had grade 1 or 2 glioma and the median age was 47 years. The patients had received prior surgery and radiotherapy. Responses were seen at all dose levels. Overall, there were 10 (36%) responses lasting from 2 to 17+ months. Treatment was generally well tolerated with few grade 3 or 4 toxicities, except at dose level 4, where four patients had grade 3/4 had thrombocytopaenia at this dose and several patients had moderate-to-severe lethargy. TMZ 200 mg m(-2) and PCB 100 mg m(-2) were well tolerated on a daily 5 x and four weekly cycle in patients with malignant glioma and clearly had antitumour activity.

To analyze the results of current treatment of patients with brain metastases from high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors. Consecutive patients treated between June 1981 and the end of 2000 with brain metastases from high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors were selected from our computerized database. There were 39 patients with cerebral metastases from high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors, and 30 (79.5%) of these patients are alive and in remission. Four patients died within 8 days of admission from disease extent. If these four patients are excluded, the survival of the remaining 35 patients is 86%. Eight patients had received prior chemotherapy, and 3 died of the disease. The antecedent pregnancy (AP) was term delivery in 23 (59%), and in 2 of those patients there was a prior history of a molar pregnancy in an AP. Six patients had a history of molar pregnancy as the AP, and in 10 the type of AP was uncertain. The presence of both liver and brain metastases was a particularly adverse prognostic combination, and only one of five patients is still alive in remission. No deaths or relapses occurred beyond 30+ months from the initiation of high-dose etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin D with cyclophosphamide and vincristine chemotherapy. With appropriate management, the outlook for patients with brain metastases from high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors is good, and the majority of patients achieved sustained remission and probably a cure with chemotherapy as the dominant form of treatment. When the tumor is sufficiently chemosensitive, the blood-brain barrier does not prevent disease elimination.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of etoposide, cisplatin/etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin D (EP/EMA) chemotherapy in patients with gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTTs), who have relapsed after or who have become refractory to EMA/cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) chemotherapy, and in patients presenting with metastatic placental site trophoblastic tumors (PSTTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have treated a total of 34 patients with GTT and eight patients with metastatic PSTT with the EP/EMA chemotherapy schedule. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received EP/EMA because of apparent drug resistance to EMA/CO, and because the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was near normal, they were not assessable for response. Twenty-one of these patients (95%) are alive and in remission. In the group where the hCG was high enough to confirm a response (greater than one log fall in hCG) to EP/EMA, all 12 patients responded and nine of these patients (75%) are alive and in remission. We have treated three patients with PSTT where the interval from antecedent pregnancy was less than 2 years, and all patients (100%) are alive and in remission. We have treated five patients where the interval from antecedent pregnancy was greater than 2 years and one fifth (20%) remain in remission. The survival for patients with GTT is 30 (88%) out of 34 patients and four (50%) out of eight patients for PSTT, giving an overall survival for these two cohorts of 34 (81%) out of 42 patients. The toxicity of this schedule is significant, with grade 3 or 4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) recorded in hemoglobin (21%), WBC (68%), and platelets (40%). The role of surgery in this group of patients is important and contributed to sustained remission in five patients (23%) and possibly helped an additional seven patients (32%). CONCLUSION: EP/EMA is an effective but moderately toxic regimen for patients with high-risk GTT who become refractory to or relapse from EMA/CO chemotherapy. Also, EP/EMA clearly has activity in patients with metastatic PSTT.

Temozolomide, a methylating imidazotetrazinone, has antitumor activity against gliomas, malignant melanoma, and mycosis fungoides and is presently administered as a 5-day oral schedule every 4 weeks. This Phase I study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of temozolomide administered as a single oral daily dose for a continuous 6- or 7-week period, evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics on this schedule, and compare total plasma exposure over 7 weeks with the conventional 5-day regimen. Twenty-four patients with varying tumor types (17 of 24 gliomas) received temozolomide. All had clinically evaluable, refractory disease; normal renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; and WHO performance status < or = 2. Temozolomide was administered at 50 mg/m2/day, increasing by 25 mg/m2/day/cohort until at 100 mg/m2/day grade 4 myelotoxicity forced dose reductions to 85 mg/m2/day, then 75 mg/m2/day. At 75 mg/m2/day the regimen was extended to 7 weeks, allowing the future potential combination with irradiation for primary gliomas. Patient responses (standard Union International Contre Cancer criteria; for gliomas objective response) and toxicity were assessed. Temozolomide plasma pharmacokinetics were determined on day 1 and at the beginning of the final week of administration (n = 5). The most frequent toxicities were myelosuppression and grades 1 and 2 nausea and vomiting. Grade 4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one of four patients receiving 100 mg/m2/day temozolomide and in one of seven patients receiving 85 mg/m2/day. These hematological toxicities did not exceed grade 2 in 10 patients receiving 75 mg/m2/day temozolomide. One of 4 malignant melanoma patients and 7 of 17 glioma patients (41%) demonstrated tumor responses. The overall response rate for this prolonged schedule was 33% (objective response, 7 of 24 patients; partial response, 1 of 24 patients); also, 6 of 17 glioma patients maintained SD. Peak plasma temozolomide concentrations were obtained 30-90 min after oral administration. Elimination in plasma was best described by a monoexponential equation with an elimination half-life of 96 +/- 16 min. No plasma accumulation of temozolomide occurred. Toxicity was greatest in higher dose cohorts, with a resultant maximum tolerated dose of 85 mg/m2/day, whereas lower dose cohorts tolerated the schedule well. The area under the temozolomide plasma versus time curve was noncumulative between the first and last week of the schedule. Temozolomide administration of 75 mg/m2/day over a 7-week period permits a 2.1-fold greater drug exposure/4 weeks in comparison with the 5-day schedule of 200 mg/m2/day repeated every 28 days. The overall response rate was 33% (glioma patients, 41% and a further 25% SD). Temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day) for 7 weeks is the recommended starting dose for further assessment of this schedule.

To analyze the causes of therapeutic success and failure in the management of patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTTs). Analysis of 272 consecutive high-risk patients treated at the trophoblastic disease center at the Charing Cross Hospital between 1979 and 1995. EMA (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D)/CO (cyclophosphamide, vincristine) chemotherapy is our treatment of choice for patients with high-risk GTT. In 272 consecutive patients the cumulative five-year survival was 86.2% (95% confidence interval, 81.9-90.5%). No deaths occurred from GTT more than two years after the start of treatment. In patients whose disease became resistant to EMA/CO or relapsed after receiving EMA/CO, the majority (70%) could be salvaged with further chemotherapy (usually with the EP (etoposide, cisplatin)/EMA chemotherapy with or without surgery. Multivariate analysis identified the following adverse prognostic factors: presence of liver metastases (P < .0001), prolonged interval from antecedent pregnancy (P < .0001), presence of brain metastases (P = .0008) and term delivery of antecedent pregnancy (P = .045). Intensive chemotherapy for treating high-risk GTT carries a small risk of inducing second malignancies, and two patients developed acute myeloid leukemia, 2 cervical malignancy and 1 gastric adenocarcinoma after receiving EMA/CO chemotherapy. EMA/CO is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for high-risk GTT. Salvage chemotherapy with EP/EMA is effective in the majority of patients whose disease is resistant to EMA/CO and should be combined with surgery when the dominant site of resistant disease is known. Major adverse prognostic variables have been identified, and patients with combinations of these factors should be considered for innovative therapeutic approaches from the outset.

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) forms a spectrum of illness from the borderline malignancy of hydatidiform mole to the highly aggressive behaviour of choriocarcinoma. In the past, many women have died from this group of disorders. However, during the last 45 years highly effective chemotherapy regimens have been developed which can be appropriately tailored to the individual patient's risk of becoming resistant to the treatment. As a result, the management of GTD is one of the modern success stories in oncology. Today, with an integrated approach to management few women die from their trophoblastic tumours.

In the July 1997 article by Bower et al entitled, "EMA/CO for High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Tumors: Results From a Cohort of 272 Patients" (J Clin Oncol 15:2636–2643, 1997) there was an error in the The second sentence of the Results section of the abstract should have read: "No deaths from GTT have occurred later than 2 years after the end of EMA/CO."

Placental site trophoblastic tumor is a very rare variant of gestational trophoblastic disease which differs histologically and immunocytochemically from gestational choriocarcinoma. The English language literature includes only 74 reported cases. Seventeen patients have been managed at Charing Cross Hospital with this diagnosis. The median follow-up is 4.6 years, and the 5-year overall survival is 80% (95% confidence interval, 55-93%). Multivariate regression analysis identified an interval of >2 years since the preceding pregnancy as an independent adverse prognostic factor. Genotypic analysis by PCR allelotyping has confirmed the gestational origin of all 11 tumors successfully studied. More detailed molecular analysis has identified the causative pregnancy for eight tumors. Five were diploid biparental tumors following term pregnancies, and three were androgenetic tumors following monospermic complete hydatidiform moles.