Eileen A. Yam
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Eileen A. Yam has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ingrid Dries‐Daffner
Population Council Escondida # 110 Col. Villa Coyoacan Deleg. Coyoacan C.P. 04000 Mexico, D.F.
1 shared publication- Juan Díaz
Population Council, Brazil
1 shared publication - Lisa A Goldman
University of California, Berkeley, Department of Epidemiology, 140 Warren Hall #7360, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
1 shared publication - Sandra G. Garcia
Population Council, Mexico City, Mexico
1 shared publication Sandra G. García
Population Council Escondida # 110 Col. Villa Coyoacan Deleg. Coyoacan C.P. 04000 Mexico, D.F.
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 11 December 2006
- Published by Wiley in Studies in Family Planning
- Vol. 37 (4) , 225-240
Abortion Opinion Research in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of the Literature
Abortion laws in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are highly restrictive and may not reflect public opinion on the issue. This article synthesizes the survey literature on attitudes toward abortion in the region. We searched standard computer indexing services and polled colleagues at regional meetings to identify every methodologically sound quantitative study of abortion opinion in LAC published between 1985 and 2005. Of the 26 studies that met inclusion criteria, none was conducted in the Caribbean, 11 were conducted in Brazil, 11 in Mexico, 3 in Argentina, and 1 in Colombia. The majority of populations surveyed support abortion under a greater number of circumstances than are permitted in their respective countries, particularly in cases of rape and threat to life or health. Future abortion opinion surveys should ask about support for the legality of abortion rather than about abstract acceptance of abortion, and questions should be worded carefully to capture the complexities of the public's views on this issue.
- 11 December 2006
- Published by Wiley in Studies in Family Planning
- Vol. 37 (4) , 225-240
Abortion Opinion Research in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of the Literature
Abortion laws in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are highly restrictive and may not reflect public opinion on the issue. This article synthesizes the survey literature on attitudes toward abortion in the region. We searched standard computer indexing services and polled colleagues at regional meetings to identify every methodologically sound quantitative study of abortion opinion in LAC published between 1985 and 2005. Of the 26 studies that met inclusion criteria, none was conducted in the Caribbean, 11 were conducted in Brazil, 11 in Mexico, 3 in Argentina, and 1 in Colombia. The majority of populations surveyed support abortion under a greater number of circumstances than are permitted in their respective countries, particularly in cases of rape and threat to life or health. Future abortion opinion surveys should ask about support for the legality of abortion rather than about abstract acceptance of abortion, and questions should be worded carefully to capture the complexities of the public's views on this issue.
- Open Access
- 15 November 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Reproductive Health
- Vol. 2 (1) , 10
Brazilian obstetrician-gynecologists and abortion: a survey of knowledge, opinions and practices
Background: Abortion laws are extremely restrictive in Brazil. The knowledge, opinions of abortion laws, and abortion practices of obstetrician-gynecologists can have a significant impact on women's access to safe abortion. Methods: We conducted a mail-in survey with a 10% random sample of obstetrician-gynecologists affiliated with the Brazilian Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. We documented participants' experiences performing abortion under a range of legal and illegal circumstances, and asked about which abortion techniques they had experience with. We used chi-square tests and crude logistic regression models to determine which sociodemographic, knowledge-related, or practice-related variables were associated with physician opinion. Results: Of the 1,500 questionnaires that we mailed out, we received responses from 572 (38%). Less than half (48%) of the respondents reported accurate knowledge about abortion law and 77% thought that the law should be more liberal. One-third of respondents reported having previous experience performing an abortion, and very few of these physicians reported having experience with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) or with misoprostol with either mifepristone or methotrexate. Physicians that favored liberalization of the law were more likely to have correct knowledge about abortion law, and to be in favor of public funding for abortion services. Conclusion: Brazilian obstetrician-gynecologists need more information on abortion laws and on safe, effective abortion procedures.
- 15 November 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Reproductive Health
- Vol. 2 (1) , 10
Open AccessBrazilian obstetrician-gynecologists and abortion: a survey of knowledge, opinions and practices
Background: Abortion laws are extremely restrictive in Brazil. The knowledge, opinions of abortion laws, and abortion practices of obstetrician-gynecologists can have a significant impact on women's access to safe abortion. Methods: We conducted a mail-in survey with a 10% random sample of obstetrician-gynecologists affiliated with the Brazilian Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. We documented participants' experiences performing abortion under a range of legal and illegal circumstances, and asked about which abortion techniques they had experience with. We used chi-square tests and crude logistic regression models to determine which sociodemographic, knowledge-related, or practice-related variables were associated with physician opinion. Results: Of the 1,500 questionnaires that we mailed out, we received responses from 572 (38%). Less than half (48%) of the respondents reported accurate knowledge about abortion law and 77% thought that the law should be more liberal. One-third of respondents reported having previous experience performing an abortion, and very few of these physicians reported having experience with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) or with misoprostol with either mifepristone or methotrexate. Physicians that favored liberalization of the law were more likely to have correct knowledge about abortion law, and to be in favor of public funding for abortion services. Conclusion: Brazilian obstetrician-gynecologists need more information on abortion laws and on safe, effective abortion procedures.