Rachel Elizabeth Casiday
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Rachel Elizabeth Casiday has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anthony Richard Cox
School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
1 shared publication C M Wright
Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, UK
1 shared publicationC Panter-Brick
Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, UK
1 shared publicationK N Parkinson
Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 September 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 65 (5) , 1059-1070
Children's health and the social theory of risk: Insights from the British measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) controversy
- 1 September 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 65 (5) , 1059-1070
Children's health and the social theory of risk: Insights from the British measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) controversy
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Drug Safety
- Vol. 29 (12) , 1105-1109
Restoring Confidence in Vaccines by Explaining Vaccine Safety Monitoring
Public trust in childhood vaccines is crucial to achieving adequate immunisation coverage to ensure population-level immunity. However, in the UK, immunisation uptake has been adversely affected by vaccine safety scares, such as those surrounding whooping cough and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR). It is our belief that greater public awareness of safety surveillance schemes may play a key role in improving trust in vaccine safety. Many parents of vaccination-age children are unaware of the procedures in place for postmarketing surveillance of vaccines. Thus, we propose specific steps for generating such awareness, such as assisting parents to report suspected adverse reactions directly to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) via the Yellow Card scheme, providing information about adverse reaction reporting with vaccination information packs, and displaying posters and leaflets to convey the message that patient concerns and experiences are taken seriously by the MHRA and to generate further awareness about the scheme. In addition, healthcare staff should be encouraged to report suspected adverse reactions relating to vaccine products. Unresolved issues about the scientific usefulness of data reported by parents and the potential for these steps to increase parental concern and expectations require further investigation.
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Drug Safety
- Vol. 29 (12) , 1105-1109
Restoring Confidence in Vaccines by Explaining Vaccine Safety Monitoring
Public trust in childhood vaccines is crucial to achieving adequate immunisation coverage to ensure population-level immunity. However, in the UK, immunisation uptake has been adversely affected by vaccine safety scares, such as those surrounding whooping cough and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR). It is our belief that greater public awareness of safety surveillance schemes may play a key role in improving trust in vaccine safety. Many parents of vaccination-age children are unaware of the procedures in place for postmarketing surveillance of vaccines. Thus, we propose specific steps for generating such awareness, such as assisting parents to report suspected adverse reactions directly to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) via the Yellow Card scheme, providing information about adverse reaction reporting with vaccination information packs, and displaying posters and leaflets to convey the message that patient concerns and experiences are taken seriously by the MHRA and to generate further awareness about the scheme. In addition, healthcare staff should be encouraged to report suspected adverse reactions relating to vaccine products. Unresolved issues about the scientific usefulness of data reported by parents and the potential for these steps to increase parental concern and expectations require further investigation.
- 31 March 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 58 (9) , 1290-1296
Do early infant feeding patterns relate to breast-feeding continuation and weight gain? Data from a longitudinal cohort study
Objectives: To describe the first-week feeding patterns for breast- vs bottle-fed babies, and their association with sustained breast-feeding and infant weight gain at 6 weeks. Design: A longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Feeding diaries were completed by mothers in an urban UK community shortly after birth; follow-up weight and feeding data were collected at routine health checks. Subjects: Mothers of 923 full-term infants born during the recruiting period agreed to join the study. In all, 502 usable diaries were returned from 54% of the cohort. Results: Breast-fed infants were fed more frequently (2.71 h between feeds) than bottle-fed infants (3.25 h between feeds) and mixed-fed infants (3.14 h between feeds) (PPP=0.004) were related to continued breast-feeding at 6 weeks. Greater first-week feeding frequency (as measured by feed-to-feed interval, h) was associated with higher weight gain at 6 weeks for breast-feeders, but no analysed factors were associated with higher weight gain for bottle-feeders. Conclusions: This large-scale study of first-week feeding patterns sheds light on the important and complicated issues of breast-feeding continuation and infant weight gain, with implications for the feeding advice given to mothers. Supplementary bottle feeds were clearly associated with discontinued breast-feeding at 6 weeks. Over that period, higher weight gain was associated with more frequent feeding for breast-fed infants only. Sponsorship: Henry Smith Charity, SPARKS, Child Growth Foundation.
- 31 March 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 58 (9) , 1290-1296
Do early infant feeding patterns relate to breast-feeding continuation and weight gain? Data from a longitudinal cohort study
Objectives: To describe the first-week feeding patterns for breast- vs bottle-fed babies, and their association with sustained breast-feeding and infant weight gain at 6 weeks. Design: A longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Feeding diaries were completed by mothers in an urban UK community shortly after birth; follow-up weight and feeding data were collected at routine health checks. Subjects: Mothers of 923 full-term infants born during the recruiting period agreed to join the study. In all, 502 usable diaries were returned from 54% of the cohort. Results: Breast-fed infants were fed more frequently (2.71 h between feeds) than bottle-fed infants (3.25 h between feeds) and mixed-fed infants (3.14 h between feeds) (PPP=0.004) were related to continued breast-feeding at 6 weeks. Greater first-week feeding frequency (as measured by feed-to-feed interval, h) was associated with higher weight gain at 6 weeks for breast-feeders, but no analysed factors were associated with higher weight gain for bottle-feeders. Conclusions: This large-scale study of first-week feeding patterns sheds light on the important and complicated issues of breast-feeding continuation and infant weight gain, with implications for the feeding advice given to mothers. Supplementary bottle feeds were clearly associated with discontinued breast-feeding at 6 weeks. Over that period, higher weight gain was associated with more frequent feeding for breast-fed infants only. Sponsorship: Henry Smith Charity, SPARKS, Child Growth Foundation.