Alistair J. Ramsay
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alistair J. Ramsay has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ian A Ramshaw
Division of Immunology and Cell Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
2 shared publicationsGordon L Ada
Division of Immunology and Cell Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
1 shared publicationGunasegaran Karupiah
Division of Immunology and Cell Biology, Australian National University , Canberra
1 shared publicationKah Hoo Leong
Division of Immunology and Cell Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
1 shared publicationPaul S. Foster
Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University , Canberra
1 shared publicationSimon P. Hogan
Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University , Canberra
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 1999
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 162 (1) , 445-452
Inhibition of Allergic Airway Inflammation in Mice Lacking Nitric Oxide Synthase 2
We have used mice rendered deficient for nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) production to study the role of inducible nitric oxide (NO) in the pathogenesis of allergic airways disease. Using a model with OVA as aeroallergen, we show that the manifestations of disease, including infiltration of inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, loss of structural integrity of the airway walls, microvascular leakage, pulmonary edema, and airway occlusion are markedly less severe in the NOS2 mutants than in wild-type animals. Indeed, NOS2-deficiency resulted in a 55–60% reduction in both circulatory and pulmonary eosinophil numbers following aeroallergen treatment, although eosinophil maturation or efflux from the bone marrow was not suppressed. There were no obvious differences in levels of airway hyperreactivity recorded in OVA-treated wild-type and NOS2-deficient mice. Interestingly, the suppression of allergic inflammation was accompanied by marked increases in T cell production of IFN-γ but not by any obvious reduction in the secretion of either IL-4 or IL-5, nor by major changes in the IgG1 and IgE OVA-specific serum Ig profiles in the mutants. The markedly enhanced production of IFN-γ in NOS2−/− mice was apparently responsible for the suppression of both eosinophilia and disease, as in vivo depletion of this factor restored allergic pathology in these animals. Our data indicate that NOS2 promotes allergic inflammation in airways via down-regulation of IFN-γ activity and suggest that inhibitors of this molecule may represent a worthwhile therapeutic strategy for allergic diseases including asthma.
- 1 January 1999
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 162 (1) , 445-452
Open AccessInhibition of Allergic Airway Inflammation in Mice Lacking Nitric Oxide Synthase 2
We have used mice rendered deficient for nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) production to study the role of inducible nitric oxide (NO) in the pathogenesis of allergic airways disease. Using a model with OVA as aeroallergen, we show that the manifestations of disease, including infiltration of inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, loss of structural integrity of the airway walls, microvascular leakage, pulmonary edema, and airway occlusion are markedly less severe in the NOS2 mutants than in wild-type animals. Indeed, NOS2-deficiency resulted in a 55–60% reduction in both circulatory and pulmonary eosinophil numbers following aeroallergen treatment, although eosinophil maturation or efflux from the bone marrow was not suppressed. There were no obvious differences in levels of airway hyperreactivity recorded in OVA-treated wild-type and NOS2-deficient mice. Interestingly, the suppression of allergic inflammation was accompanied by marked increases in T cell production of IFN-γ but not by any obvious reduction in the secretion of either IL-4 or IL-5, nor by major changes in the IgG1 and IgE OVA-specific serum Ig profiles in the mutants. The markedly enhanced production of IFN-γ in NOS2−/− mice was apparently responsible for the suppression of both eosinophilia and disease, as in vivo depletion of this factor restored allergic pathology in these animals. Our data indicate that NOS2 promotes allergic inflammation in airways via down-regulation of IFN-γ activity and suggest that inhibitors of this molecule may represent a worthwhile therapeutic strategy for allergic diseases including asthma.
- 1 August 1997
- Published by Wiley in Immunology & Cell Biology
- Vol. 75 (4) , 382-388
DNA vaccination against virus infection and enhancement of antiviral immunity following consecutive immunization with DNA and viral vectors
Recent demonstrations of the immunogenicity of antigens encoded in DNA plasmids following delivery by various routes have heralded a new era in vaccine development. In this article, we review progress in DNA‐based antiviral immunoprophylaxis. Preclinical studies have already established the immunogenicity of DNA plasmids encoding protective antigens from a wide variety of viral pathogens and work published in recent months has raised real prospects of broadly protective DNA vaccination against infections with influenza virus and HIV. We also describe a consecutive immunization protocol consisting of a priming dose of vaccine antigen encoded in DNA plasmids followed by a booster with the same antigen encoded in recombinant fowlpox virus vectors. We have used this strategy to generate protective antiviral cell‐mediated immunity and sustained, high‐level antibody responses both systemically and at mucosae. and to elucidate immunological mechanisms underlying the development of immunity to antigens delivered in DNA vectors.
- 1 August 1997
- Published by Wiley in Immunology & Cell Biology
- Vol. 75 (4) , 382-388
DNA vaccination against virus infection and enhancement of antiviral immunity following consecutive immunization with DNA and viral vectors
Recent demonstrations of the immunogenicity of antigens encoded in DNA plasmids following delivery by various routes have heralded a new era in vaccine development. In this article, we review progress in DNA‐based antiviral immunoprophylaxis. Preclinical studies have already established the immunogenicity of DNA plasmids encoding protective antigens from a wide variety of viral pathogens and work published in recent months has raised real prospects of broadly protective DNA vaccination against infections with influenza virus and HIV. We also describe a consecutive immunization protocol consisting of a priming dose of vaccine antigen encoded in DNA plasmids followed by a booster with the same antigen encoded in recombinant fowlpox virus vectors. We have used this strategy to generate protective antiviral cell‐mediated immunity and sustained, high‐level antibody responses both systemically and at mucosae. and to elucidate immunological mechanisms underlying the development of immunity to antigens delivered in DNA vectors.
- 1 August 1997
- Published by Wiley in Immunology & Cell Biology
- Vol. 75 (4) , 360-363
DNA immunization
DNA immunization has recently emerged as a highly promising approach for the prevention and therapy of a wide range of infectious and non‐infectious diseases. Here, we review the rapid development of this field and recent advances in our understanding of some of the mechanisms by which DNA vaccines stimulate the immune system.
- 1 August 1997
- Published by Wiley in Immunology & Cell Biology
- Vol. 75 (4) , 360-363
DNA immunization
DNA immunization has recently emerged as a highly promising approach for the prevention and therapy of a wide range of infectious and non‐infectious diseases. Here, we review the rapid development of this field and recent advances in our understanding of some of the mechanisms by which DNA vaccines stimulate the immune system.