Norma O'LEary
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Norma O'LEary has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Eoin Tiernan
Department of Palliative Medicine, St Vincent’s University Hospital , Dublin
2 shared publicationsChristina O’lOughlin
Department of Cardiology, St Vincent’s University Hospital , Dublin
1 shared publicationKenneth McDonald
Department of Cardiology, St Vincent’s University Hospital , Dublin
1 shared publicationNiamh F. Murphy
Department of Cardiology, St Vincent’s University Hospital , Dublin
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 29 March 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Heart Failure
- Vol. 11 (4) , 406-412
A Comparative Study of the Palliative Care Needs of Heart Failure and Cancer Patients
Aims: Studies suggest that patients with advanced heart failure (HF) have unmet palliative care (PC) needs. However, many of these studies have been retrospective or based on patients receiving poorly coordinated ad hoc care. We aimed to demonstrate whether the PC needs of patients with advanced HF receiving specialist multidisciplinary coordinated care are similar to cancer patients deemed to have specialist PC needs; thereby justifying the extension of specialist PC services to HF patients. Methods and results: This was a cross-sectional comparative cohort study of 50 HF patients and 50 cancer patients, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Both patient cohorts were statistically indistinguishable in terms of symptom burden, emotional wellbeing, and quality-of-life scores. HF patients had good access to community and social support. HF patients particularly valued the close supervision, medication monitoring, ease of access to service, telephone support, and key worker provided at the HF unit. A small subset of patients had unmet PC needs. A palliative transition point is described. Conclusion: HF patients should not be excluded from specialist PC services. However, the majority of their needs can be met at a HF unit. Recognition of the palliative transition point may be key to ensuring that end-of-life issues are addressed. The palliative transition point needs further evaluation.
- 29 March 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Heart Failure
- Vol. 11 (4) , 406-412
A Comparative Study of the Palliative Care Needs of Heart Failure and Cancer Patients
Aims: Studies suggest that patients with advanced heart failure (HF) have unmet palliative care (PC) needs. However, many of these studies have been retrospective or based on patients receiving poorly coordinated ad hoc care. We aimed to demonstrate whether the PC needs of patients with advanced HF receiving specialist multidisciplinary coordinated care are similar to cancer patients deemed to have specialist PC needs; thereby justifying the extension of specialist PC services to HF patients. Methods and results: This was a cross-sectional comparative cohort study of 50 HF patients and 50 cancer patients, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Both patient cohorts were statistically indistinguishable in terms of symptom burden, emotional wellbeing, and quality-of-life scores. HF patients had good access to community and social support. HF patients particularly valued the close supervision, medication monitoring, ease of access to service, telephone support, and key worker provided at the HF unit. A small subset of patients had unmet PC needs. A palliative transition point is described. Conclusion: HF patients should not be excluded from specialist PC services. However, the majority of their needs can be met at a HF unit. Recognition of the palliative transition point may be key to ensuring that end-of-life issues are addressed. The palliative transition point needs further evaluation.
- 23 January 2008
- Published by SAGE Publications in Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 22 (1) , 77-83
Survey of specialist palliative care services for noncancer patients in Ireland and perceived barriers
Background: Specialist palliative care (SPC) services in Ireland are well developed by international standards. However, standardized information on all patients of SPC services is not collected so the proportion of patients seen with a noncancer diagnosis is just an estimate at 5%. Aims: To describe Irish SPC services' provision for, and attitudes to noncancer patients. Method: Postal questionnaire of clinical managers of all SPC services listed in the directory of SPC services in Ireland, September 2005. Results: Sixty-five questionnaires were returned representing a 100% response rate. Twenty four percent (n = 15) of services limited availability for noncancer patients in some way. Of those services available for noncancer patients, the type of care provided to them was the same as for cancer patients in 81% of services (n = 50). The percentage of all patients seen in 2004 who had a noncancer diagnosis was 7.21%. Only 68% (n = 42) of services had a written referral policy. The top three perceived barriers by SPC service providers were the unpredictable noncancer disease trajectory (mean intensity = 6.77), the resultant difficulties with developing referral criteria (mean intensity = 6.38) and the lack of noncancer disease specific expertise (mean intensity = 5.96). Discussion: There is a mismatch between availability of palliative care services for noncancer patients and uptake. The noncancer disease trajectory continues to be considered a barrier to care. Imaginative models of care need to be developed that are not prognosis based. Palliative Medicine 2008; 22: 77—83
- 23 January 2008
- Published by SAGE Publications in Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 22 (1) , 77-83
Survey of specialist palliative care services for noncancer patients in Ireland and perceived barriers
Background: Specialist palliative care (SPC) services in Ireland are well developed by international standards. However, standardized information on all patients of SPC services is not collected so the proportion of patients seen with a noncancer diagnosis is just an estimate at 5%. Aims: To describe Irish SPC services' provision for, and attitudes to noncancer patients. Method: Postal questionnaire of clinical managers of all SPC services listed in the directory of SPC services in Ireland, September 2005. Results: Sixty-five questionnaires were returned representing a 100% response rate. Twenty four percent (n = 15) of services limited availability for noncancer patients in some way. Of those services available for noncancer patients, the type of care provided to them was the same as for cancer patients in 81% of services (n = 50). The percentage of all patients seen in 2004 who had a noncancer diagnosis was 7.21%. Only 68% (n = 42) of services had a written referral policy. The top three perceived barriers by SPC service providers were the unpredictable noncancer disease trajectory (mean intensity = 6.77), the resultant difficulties with developing referral criteria (mean intensity = 6.38) and the lack of noncancer disease specific expertise (mean intensity = 5.96). Discussion: There is a mismatch between availability of palliative care services for noncancer patients and uptake. The noncancer disease trajectory continues to be considered a barrier to care. Imaginative models of care need to be developed that are not prognosis based. Palliative Medicine 2008; 22: 77—83
Curse of the course
Norma O'Leary is beginning to think she has been on too many