Kenji Yamada
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kenji Yamada has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kevin Knight
Texas Christian University
4 shared publications - Daniel Marcu
Information Sciences Institute Computer Science Department University of Southern California
3 shared publications - Michael Jahr
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
2 shared publications - Ulrich Germann
Information Sciences Institute and Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA
2 shared publications Hal Daynem Iii
1 shared publicationIrene Langkilde-Geary
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 7 November 2003
- Published by Elsevier in Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 154 (1-2) , 127-143
Fast and optimal decoding for machine translation
- 7 November 2003
- Published by Elsevier in Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 154 (1-2) , 127-143
Fast and optimal decoding for machine translation
- Open Access
- 1 January 2002
- Published by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
The Importance of Lexicalized Syntax Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
The parsing community has long recognized the importance of lexicalized models of syntax. By contrast, these models do not appear to have had an impact on the statistical NLG community. To prove their importance in NLG, we show that a lexicalized model of syntax improves the performance of a statistical text compression system, and show results that suggest it would also improve the performances of an MT application and a pure natural language generation system.
- 1 January 2002
- Published by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
Open AccessThe Importance of Lexicalized Syntax Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
The parsing community has long recognized the importance of lexicalized models of syntax. By contrast, these models do not appear to have had an impact on the statistical NLG community. To prove their importance in NLG, we show that a lexicalized model of syntax improves the performance of a statistical text compression system, and show results that suggest it would also improve the performances of an MT application and a pure natural language generation system.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2001
- Published by Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
- p. 303-310
A decoder for syntax-based statistical MT
This paper describes a decoding algorithm for a syntax-based translation model (Yamada and Knight, 2001). The model has been extended to incorporate phrasal translations as presented here. In contrast to a conventional word-to-word statistical model, a decoder for the syntaxbased model builds up an English parse tree given a sentence in a foreign language. As the model size becomes huge in a practical setting, and the decoder considers multiple syntactic structures for each word alignment, several pruning techniques are necessary. We tested our decoder in a Chinese-to-English translation system, and obtained better results than IBM Model 4. We also discuss issues concerning the relation between this decoder and a language model.
- 1 January 2001
- Published by Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
- p. 303-310
Open AccessA decoder for syntax-based statistical MT
This paper describes a decoding algorithm for a syntax-based translation model (Yamada and Knight, 2001). The model has been extended to incorporate phrasal translations as presented here. In contrast to a conventional word-to-word statistical model, a decoder for the syntaxbased model builds up an English parse tree given a sentence in a foreign language. As the model size becomes huge in a practical setting, and the decoder considers multiple syntactic structures for each word alignment, several pruning techniques are necessary. We tested our decoder in a Chinese-to-English translation system, and obtained better results than IBM Model 4. We also discuss issues concerning the relation between this decoder and a language model.
- 1 January 2001
- Published by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
Fast Decoding and Optimal Decoding for Machine Translation
A good decoding algorithm is critical to the success of any statistical machine translation system. The decoder's job is to find the translation that is most likely according to set of previously learned parameters (and a formula for combining them). Since the space of possible translations is extremely large, typical decoding algorithms are only able to examine a portion of it, thus risking to miss good solutions. In this paper, we compare the speed and output quality of a traditional stack-based decoding algorithm with two new decoders: a fast greedy decoder and a slow but optimal decoder that treats decoding as an integer-programming optimization problem.
- 1 January 2001
- Published by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
Fast Decoding and Optimal Decoding for Machine Translation
A good decoding algorithm is critical to the success of any statistical machine translation system. The decoder's job is to find the translation that is most likely according to set of previously learned parameters (and a formula for combining them). Since the space of possible translations is extremely large, typical decoding algorithms are only able to examine a portion of it, thus risking to miss good solutions. In this paper, we compare the speed and output quality of a traditional stack-based decoding algorithm with two new decoders: a fast greedy decoder and a slow but optimal decoder that treats decoding as an integer-programming optimization problem.