Paul E Plsek
Research Subjects
Paul E Plsek has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
C M Kilo
1 shared publicationJ C Benneyan
Director, Quality & Productivity Laboratory, MIME Department, 334 Snell Engineering Center, 360 Huntington Avenue, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
1 shared publicationR C Lloyd
Director, Quality Resource Services, Advocate Health Center, 2025 Windsor Drive, Oak Brook, IL 60523 USA
1 shared publicationTim Wilson
Royal College of General Practitioners, London SW7 1P
1 shared publication- Trisha Greenhalgh
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
Satan what done it
Footnotes Competing interests: None declared.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 December 2003
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (6) , 458-464
Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement
Improvement of health care requires making changes in processes of care and service delivery. Although process performance is measured to determine if these changes are having the desired beneficial effects, this analysis is complicated by the existence of natural variation—that is, repeated measurements naturally yield different values and, even if nothing was done, a subsequent measurement might seem to indicate a better or worse performance. Traditional statistical analysis methods account for natural variation but require aggregation of measurements over time, which can delay decision making. Statistical process control (SPC) is a branch of statistics that combines rigorous time series analysis methods with graphical presentation of data, often yielding insights into the data more quickly and in a way more understandable to lay decision makers. SPC and its primary tool—the control chart—provide researchers and practitioners with a method of better understanding and communicating data from healthcare improvement efforts. This paper provides an overview of SPC and several practical examples of the healthcare applications of control charts.
- 1 December 2003
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (6) , 458-464
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessStatistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement
Improvement of health care requires making changes in processes of care and service delivery. Although process performance is measured to determine if these changes are having the desired beneficial effects, this analysis is complicated by the existence of natural variation—that is, repeated measurements naturally yield different values and, even if nothing was done, a subsequent measurement might seem to indicate a better or worse performance. Traditional statistical analysis methods account for natural variation but require aggregation of measurements over time, which can delay decision making. Statistical process control (SPC) is a branch of statistics that combines rigorous time series analysis methods with graphical presentation of data, often yielding insights into the data more quickly and in a way more understandable to lay decision makers. SPC and its primary tool—the control chart—provide researchers and practitioners with a method of better understanding and communicating data from healthcare improvement efforts. This paper provides an overview of SPC and several practical examples of the healthcare applications of control charts.
- Top Cited Papers
The challenge of complexity in health care
- 2 May 2000
- Vol. 25 (6) , 40-2, 44
From resistance to attraction: a different approach to change.
How can physician executives interested in promoting change be more effective at the task? This article explores how to create an attraction towards change, as opposed to viewing change as overcoming resistance. Learning to recognize naturally occurring change, identify attractors, explore the rationality of others' points of view, and reduce risk are clear and constructive insights from research and emerging systems science. Other ideas to consider are: Understand the issues of those you wish to change, create changes that are "exothermic," produce system changes, accept responsibility, learn from failed efforts, and focus on building relationships of trust.
- 2 May 2000
- Vol. 25 (6) , 40-2, 44
From resistance to attraction: a different approach to change.
How can physician executives interested in promoting change be more effective at the task? This article explores how to create an attraction towards change, as opposed to viewing change as overcoming resistance. Learning to recognize naturally occurring change, identify attractors, explore the rationality of others' points of view, and reduce risk are clear and constructive insights from research and emerging systems science. Other ideas to consider are: Understand the issues of those you wish to change, create changes that are "exothermic," produce system changes, accept responsibility, learn from failed efforts, and focus on building relationships of trust.