Darko Mušicki
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Darko Mušicki has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Taek Lyul Song
Department of Electronic Systems Engineering Hanyang University Republic of Korea
2 shared publicationsChul Mok Lee
The 6th R&D Center Agency for Defense Development Changwon Gyeongnamdo Republic of Korea
1 shared publication- Richard Ellem
Maritime Operations Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, PO Box 1500, Edinburgh SA 5111, Australia
1 shared publication Tae Han Kim
Department of Electronic Systems Engineering Hanyang University Ansan Kyeonggi‐do Republic of Korea
1 shared publication- Xuezhi Wang
Melbourne Systems Laboratory, Dept of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
1 shared publication Yong Kim
Combat System R&D Laboratory LIG Nex1 Republic of Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
- Vol. 9 (1) , 10-18
Multitarget tracking with state dependent detection
Target tracking determines the number and the trajectories of targets in the surveillance area. The sensors provide an imperfect target detection and measurement environment, complicated by clutter measurements. The vast majority of published target tracking algorithms assume that the probability of target detection is independent of the trajectory state. This assumption is often incorrect, with subsequent degradation in the target tracking performance. The authors present two multitarget trackers which incorporate the state‐dependent probability of target detection, each of which improves upon the state of the art capabilities of target tracking in such environments.
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
- Vol. 9 (1) , 10-18
Open AccessMultitarget tracking with state dependent detection
Target tracking determines the number and the trajectories of targets in the surveillance area. The sensors provide an imperfect target detection and measurement environment, complicated by clutter measurements. The vast majority of published target tracking algorithms assume that the probability of target detection is independent of the trajectory state. This assumption is often incorrect, with subsequent degradation in the target tracking performance. The authors present two multitarget trackers which incorporate the state‐dependent probability of target detection, each of which improves upon the state of the art capabilities of target tracking in such environments.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
- Vol. 9 (1) , 62-66
Smoothing joint integrated probabilistic data association
The authors extend the smoothing integrated probabilistic data association algorithm to multi‐target tracking in clutter, or alternatively, use smoothing to improve the joint integrated probabilistic data association (JIPDA) algorithm. The predictions of forward and backward JIPDA are fused to form the smoothing prediction, which is used for smoothing multi‐target data association.
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
- Vol. 9 (1) , 62-66
Open AccessSmoothing joint integrated probabilistic data association
The authors extend the smoothing integrated probabilistic data association algorithm to multi‐target tracking in clutter, or alternatively, use smoothing to improve the joint integrated probabilistic data association (JIPDA) algorithm. The predictions of forward and backward JIPDA are fused to form the smoothing prediction, which is used for smoothing multi‐target data association.
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 263-268
Fast Track Confirmation for Multi-Target Tracking with Doppler Measurements
In this paper, a one-point track initiation method is derived for conventional target tracking systems where noisy sensor measurements of both target position and Doppler are available. Tentative tracks are initiated using position measurements from every single scan and the associated Doppler measurements are incorporated to reduce the velocity uncertainties of these initiated track states. The proposed track initiation method is capable of reducing the computational requirements of the system quadratically compared to the classical two-point method when false measurements are present. We further demonstrate that a tracking system which incorporates Doppler measurements both for track initiation and measurement-to-track association can greatly reduce the number of false tracks that are generated and provides greater flexibility for confirming true tracks without sacrificing the system's performance in terms of the number of confirmed false tracks. As a consequence, a tracking system that incorporates the proposed method will exhibit a much shorter true track confirmation delay than a similar system based on the standard approach.
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 263-268
Fast Track Confirmation for Multi-Target Tracking with Doppler Measurements
In this paper, a one-point track initiation method is derived for conventional target tracking systems where noisy sensor measurements of both target position and Doppler are available. Tentative tracks are initiated using position measurements from every single scan and the associated Doppler measurements are incorporated to reduce the velocity uncertainties of these initiated track states. The proposed track initiation method is capable of reducing the computational requirements of the system quadratically compared to the classical two-point method when false measurements are present. We further demonstrate that a tracking system which incorporates Doppler measurements both for track initiation and measurement-to-track association can greatly reduce the number of false tracks that are generated and provides greater flexibility for confirming true tracks without sacrificing the system's performance in terms of the number of confirmed false tracks. As a consequence, a tracking system that incorporates the proposed method will exhibit a much shorter true track confirmation delay than a similar system based on the standard approach.