Lisa Sweet
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Lisa Sweet has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Anne Harley
Geriatric Rehabilitation Service, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication- Atul Jaiswal
École D’optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1P1, Canada
1 shared publication - Frank Knoefel
Memory Care Research Group, Bruyère Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
1 shared publication Lisa Wright
Geriatric Rehabilitation Service, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication- Melanie Chandler
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
1 shared publication Mike Van Adel
Elisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa and University of Ottawa, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease
- Vol. 2 (3) , 26
Implementation of the Memory Support System for Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Feasibility Survey Study
Background/Objectives: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a condition between normal aging and dementia, is characterized by cognitive changes that do not significantly affect instrumental activities of daily living. The Memory Support System (MSS), an evidence-based behavioral intervention developed by the Mayo Clinic, has been shown to aid those living with MCI and their support partners in coping with cognitive challenges. However, the MSS has not been offered clinically within the Canadian context. Therefore, we conducted a study assessing the feasibility of the MSS from the perspectives of individuals living with MCI and their support partners. Methods: Participants from an institutional registry of research participants, patients, and support partners at a memory clinic, as well as members of a local Dementia Society, were approached to complete an online or paper version of a survey assessing feasibility dimensions. Responses were compared between and within groups for differences in mean scores and associations between linked binary choice response questions. Results: A total of 77 responses were received; 39 surveys were completed by participants with MCI, and 38 by support partners. Respondents found the MSS to be acceptable and practical. On average, participants thought it would be more difficult to train in using the MSS than support partners. Both groups expressed interest in the intervention. On average, participants with MCI and support partners preferred virtual MSS training to in-person and indicated more interest in participating in training over six weeks as compared to two weeks. Conclusions: Flexibility in duration and format when offering the MSS are important considerations when offering the intervention as part of a clinical program. Future research should evaluate cost-effectiveness (e.g., financial, staff resources, etc.) of the MSS approach if it were to be institutionalized in the Ontario healthcare system.
- 7 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease
- Vol. 2 (3) , 26
Open AccessImplementation of the Memory Support System for Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Feasibility Survey Study
Background/Objectives: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a condition between normal aging and dementia, is characterized by cognitive changes that do not significantly affect instrumental activities of daily living. The Memory Support System (MSS), an evidence-based behavioral intervention developed by the Mayo Clinic, has been shown to aid those living with MCI and their support partners in coping with cognitive challenges. However, the MSS has not been offered clinically within the Canadian context. Therefore, we conducted a study assessing the feasibility of the MSS from the perspectives of individuals living with MCI and their support partners. Methods: Participants from an institutional registry of research participants, patients, and support partners at a memory clinic, as well as members of a local Dementia Society, were approached to complete an online or paper version of a survey assessing feasibility dimensions. Responses were compared between and within groups for differences in mean scores and associations between linked binary choice response questions. Results: A total of 77 responses were received; 39 surveys were completed by participants with MCI, and 38 by support partners. Respondents found the MSS to be acceptable and practical. On average, participants thought it would be more difficult to train in using the MSS than support partners. Both groups expressed interest in the intervention. On average, participants with MCI and support partners preferred virtual MSS training to in-person and indicated more interest in participating in training over six weeks as compared to two weeks. Conclusions: Flexibility in duration and format when offering the MSS are important considerations when offering the intervention as part of a clinical program. Future research should evaluate cost-effectiveness (e.g., financial, staff resources, etc.) of the MSS approach if it were to be institutionalized in the Ontario healthcare system.
- Open Access
- 1 December 2011
- Published by Elsevier in International Psychogeriatrics
- Vol. 23 (10) , 1582-1591
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in geriatric rehabilitation: psychometric properties and association with rehabilitation outcomes
- 1 December 2011
- Published by Elsevier in International Psychogeriatrics
- Vol. 23 (10) , 1582-1591
Open AccessThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in geriatric rehabilitation: psychometric properties and association with rehabilitation outcomes