G. L. Sills
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
G. L. Sills has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Neil T. Schwanz
Geotechnical Engineer, Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering Branch (GEEB), Geosciences and Structures Division (GSD), Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
3 shared publications - Noah D. Vroman
Geotechnical Engineer, Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering Branch (GEEB), Geosciences and Structures Division (GSD), Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
3 shared publications - R. E. Wahl
Geotechnical Engineer, Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering Branch (GEEB), Geosciences and Structures Division (GSD), Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
2 shared publications R. E. Wahl
Geotechnical Engineer, Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering Branch (GEEB), Geosciences and Structures Division (GSD), Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), 3909 Halls Ferry Rd., Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2009
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
- Vol. 135 (12) , 1994-1995
Closure to “Overview of New Orleans Levee Failures: Lessons Learned and Their Impact on National Levee Design and Assessment” by G. L. Sills, N. D. Vroman, R. E. Wahl, and N. T. Schwanz
- 1 December 2009
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
- Vol. 135 (12) , 1994-1995
Closure to “Overview of New Orleans Levee Failures: Lessons Learned and Their Impact on National Levee Design and Assessment” by G. L. Sills, N. D. Vroman, R. E. Wahl, and N. T. Schwanz
- 1 May 2008
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
- Vol. 134 (5) , 556-565
Overview of New Orleans Levee Failures: Lessons Learned and Their Impact on National Levee Design and Assessment
This paper provides an overview of the Southeast Louisiana Flood and Hurricane Protection System that was in place at the time of Hurricane Katrina. Both geography and components of the system are described. A brief description of the development of the storm, the major damage caused, and lessons learned are discussed.
- 1 May 2008
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
- Vol. 134 (5) , 556-565
Overview of New Orleans Levee Failures: Lessons Learned and Their Impact on National Levee Design and Assessment
This paper provides an overview of the Southeast Louisiana Flood and Hurricane Protection System that was in place at the time of Hurricane Katrina. Both geography and components of the system are described. A brief description of the development of the storm, the major damage caused, and lessons learned are discussed.
- 14 October 2007
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- p. 1-11
New Orleans vs. Katrina: Overview and USACE Preliminary Response (Emergency Operations)
This paper provides an overview of the Southeast Louisiana Flood and Hurricane Protection System that was in place at the time of Hurricane Katrina. Both geography and components of the system are described. A brief description of the development of the storm and the major damage caused is also discussed. Almost immediately after the realization that various components of the system had failed, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) responded through an intensive mode of emergency operations. The entire system was surveyed by air to understand the condition of the system and to assess the extent of the damage. The survey was followed by rescue operations and planning for closure of the breaches and "unwatering" of the flooded areas.
- 14 October 2007
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- p. 1-11
New Orleans vs. Katrina: Overview and USACE Preliminary Response (Emergency Operations)
This paper provides an overview of the Southeast Louisiana Flood and Hurricane Protection System that was in place at the time of Hurricane Katrina. Both geography and components of the system are described. A brief description of the development of the storm and the major damage caused is also discussed. Almost immediately after the realization that various components of the system had failed, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) responded through an intensive mode of emergency operations. The entire system was surveyed by air to understand the condition of the system and to assess the extent of the damage. The survey was followed by rescue operations and planning for closure of the breaches and "unwatering" of the flooded areas.
- 14 October 2007
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Lessons Learned from the Levee Failures in the New Orleans Area and their Impact on Levee Design and Assessment across the Nation
In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina made landfall just east of New Orleans and inflicted widespread damage on the Hurricane Protection System (HPS) for southeast Louisiana. The storm surge produced by Hurricane Katrina in some cases overwhelmed the HPS beyond its design, but in other cases levee failures occurred at water levels well below their design. The response to this disaster by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) included forming an Interagency Performance Evaluation Taskforce (IPET) to study the response of the system and, among many lines of inquiry, to identify the causes of failure of levees and floodwalls. Beginning in September 2005, the IPET gathered forensic geotechnical data from failed portions of levees and floodwalls. These data were considered perishable and had to be gathered quickly due to levee rebuilding operations. The performance of the levee and floodwall system provided valuable lessons. These lessons consist of: the need for resilience of the HPS; the need for risk-based planning and design approach; and the deficiency in knowledge, technology, and expertise in the hurricane protection system arena. The rebuilding efforts and future assessments and designs of hurricane protection systems will incorporate the lessons learned.
- 14 October 2007
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Lessons Learned from the Levee Failures in the New Orleans Area and their Impact on Levee Design and Assessment across the Nation
In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina made landfall just east of New Orleans and inflicted widespread damage on the Hurricane Protection System (HPS) for southeast Louisiana. The storm surge produced by Hurricane Katrina in some cases overwhelmed the HPS beyond its design, but in other cases levee failures occurred at water levels well below their design. The response to this disaster by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) included forming an Interagency Performance Evaluation Taskforce (IPET) to study the response of the system and, among many lines of inquiry, to identify the causes of failure of levees and floodwalls. Beginning in September 2005, the IPET gathered forensic geotechnical data from failed portions of levees and floodwalls. These data were considered perishable and had to be gathered quickly due to levee rebuilding operations. The performance of the levee and floodwall system provided valuable lessons. These lessons consist of: the need for resilience of the HPS; the need for risk-based planning and design approach; and the deficiency in knowledge, technology, and expertise in the hurricane protection system arena. The rebuilding efforts and future assessments and designs of hurricane protection systems will incorporate the lessons learned.