Wesley G. Zeger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Wesley G. Zeger has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aaron Nathan Barksdale
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States of America
3 shared publications - Michael C. Wadman
Emergency Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States, USA
3 shared publications - Thang T. Nguyen
University of Nebraska Medical Center
2 shared publications - Andrew Hatfield
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States of America
1 shared publication - Andy T. Schnaubelt
Department of Neurosurgery, United States
1 shared publication Bradley Younggren
Department of Emergency Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 14 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 64, 155-160
Incidence of unknown COVID-19 infection in a cohort of emergency physicians and advance practice providers
- 14 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 64, 155-160
Incidence of unknown COVID-19 infection in a cohort of emergency physicians and advance practice providers
- 30 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 61, 111-116
Pandemic driven innovation: A pilot evaluation of an alternative respiratory pathogen collection device
- 30 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 61, 111-116
Pandemic driven innovation: A pilot evaluation of an alternative respiratory pathogen collection device
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 47, 253-257
Implementation of a COVID-19 cohort area resulted in no surface or air contamination in surrounding areas in one academic emergency department
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 47, 253-257
Implementation of a COVID-19 cohort area resulted in no surface or air contamination in surrounding areas in one academic emergency department
- 1 January 2012
- Published by World Journal of Emergency Medicine in World Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 3 (3) , 182-185
Comparison of cosyntropin versus caffeine for post-dural puncture headaches: A randomized double-blind trial
Cosyntropin has been reported to be effective in the treatment of post-dural puncture headaches, but there is a lack of data on its effectiveness. We compared the efficacy of cosyntropin with that of caffeine in the treatment of post-dural puncture headaches. We performed an interim analysis of a prospective, double blinded, trial of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with a post-dural puncture headache. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous caffeine or intravenous cosyntropin. Values on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded at 0, 60, and 120 minutes to assess pain. Rescue therapy was documented on the study data forms. Its effectiveness was determined by the need for this therapy. Thirty-seven patients were included and four patients were excluded from the analysis because of protocol violations or incomplete data. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. Caffeine was 80% (95% CI 60–100%) effective and cosyntropin was 56% (95% CI 33–79%) effective in treating post-dural puncture headaches. The group’s VAS scores at 0, 60, and 120 minutes were 80 mm, 41 mm, 31 mm for caffeine and 80 mm, 40 mm, 33 mm for cosyntropin, respectively (P=0.66). Caffeine was not more effective than cosyntropin in treating patients with post-dural puncture headaches, and there was no difference in the degree of pain relief on VAS assessment.
- 1 January 2012
- Published by World Journal of Emergency Medicine in World Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 3 (3) , 182-185
Comparison of cosyntropin versus caffeine for post-dural puncture headaches: A randomized double-blind trial
Cosyntropin has been reported to be effective in the treatment of post-dural puncture headaches, but there is a lack of data on its effectiveness. We compared the efficacy of cosyntropin with that of caffeine in the treatment of post-dural puncture headaches. We performed an interim analysis of a prospective, double blinded, trial of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with a post-dural puncture headache. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous caffeine or intravenous cosyntropin. Values on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded at 0, 60, and 120 minutes to assess pain. Rescue therapy was documented on the study data forms. Its effectiveness was determined by the need for this therapy. Thirty-seven patients were included and four patients were excluded from the analysis because of protocol violations or incomplete data. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. Caffeine was 80% (95% CI 60–100%) effective and cosyntropin was 56% (95% CI 33–79%) effective in treating post-dural puncture headaches. The group’s VAS scores at 0, 60, and 120 minutes were 80 mm, 41 mm, 31 mm for caffeine and 80 mm, 40 mm, 33 mm for cosyntropin, respectively (P=0.66). Caffeine was not more effective than cosyntropin in treating patients with post-dural puncture headaches, and there was no difference in the degree of pain relief on VAS assessment.