Robert Hube

Background: After unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients place more weight on the nonsurgical limb than the surgical limb. The objective of this study was to determine the possibility of providing live biofeedback during early recovery of patients undergoing unilateral TKA and to determine the necessary sample size for future trials. Methods: Twenty patients with unilateral TKA were randomized into two groups: a feedback group and a control group. Inclusion criteria included no contralateral knee pain and aid-free walking before surgery. There were 8 patients in the feedback group and 10 in the control group. Compliance with the recommended training was 91%. The feedback group trained with an insole device for 15 min a day for 4 weeks, along with normal physiotherapy. The control group received normal physiotherapy only. Gait parameters were recorded on level ground at two and six weeks. The primary outcome was the percent loading rate. The secondary outcomes included gait speed, cadence, percent peak force, and pain. Results: Patients within the feedback group showed a small, non-significant trend toward a higher precent load rate at 6 weeks compared to the control group in level walking (p = 0.92). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that live biofeedback on a gait parameter, like percent load rate, can be provided by the mentioned system and may support immediate changes in gait parameters. The compliance of 91% with training and no reported adverse events indicates that the system was easy to use. Following TKA, there may be a potential exploratory use of mobile, real-time biofeedback to help address gait abnormalities and accelerate rehabilitation. This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03673293) on 14 September 2018. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of the University of Utah (IRB_00110935) on 10 September 2018.

This meta analysis address the relationship between infection developing after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and heterotopic ossification (HO). To identify the gaps in available knowledge, we screened for full-length peer-reviewed research articles listed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science over the past 20 years. The following search terms and Boolean operators were used: heterotopic ossification AND infection AND (hip replacement OR hip arthroplasty). The search resulted in the identification of as few as 14 articles describing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and HO after THA. Data summarized from 6 studies suitable for further meta-analysis yielded a cumulative sample size of 753 observations, with 186 recorded events of HO. The pooled RR was estimated at 2.22 (95% CI: 1.00 to 4.91, p = 0.0497), suggesting a more than twofold risk of HO compared to the group without PJI. In conclusion, there is a clear association between a higher risk of HO and PJI. Basic research findings support the hypothesis that bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) can lead to osteogenesis through a toll-like receptor (TLR) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway in the course of HO development. Together, these results suggest that HO prophylaxis should always be prescribed in PJI after THA. Moreover, during revisions following THA for presumed non-septic reasons, the presence of HO warrants consideration for infection, as there is a potential heightened risk of pathologic ossification induced by PAMPs.Keywords: heterotopic ossification; total hip arthroplasty; total hip replacement; periprosthetic joint infection; bacteriaAuthors Ł. Pulik and P. Łęgosz contributed equally to this work.

Reconstruction of Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments using the footing technique

RECONSTRUCTION OF PAPROSKY 3B ACETABULAR DEFECTS WITH POROUS TANTALUM SHELLS AND AUGMENTS IN REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING THE FOOTING TECHNIQUE

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common disabilities in the elderly. When conservative management fails, total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage OA. Since quality and durability of implants has steadily improved, pre -and postsurgical processes moved into the focus of research. Hence, eHealth approaches offer an opportunity to provide a more available continuity of care. Regarding individualized pre-, peri-, and postsurgical stages, eHealth is expected to improve patient engagement, self-care, and outcomes across the surgical pathway. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the eHealth application “alley” as an adjuvant intervention to TJA. The app provides comprehensive information to empower patient with hip or knee OA to prepare and accompany them for their TJA surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that the pre- and postoperative adjuvant use of the eHealth application “alley” (intervention group, IG) leads to improved functional outcome. Methods: Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial including n = 200 patients diagnosed with hip and n = 200 patients with knee OA (n = 200) scheduled for TJA. Patients of both groups will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms. Patients in the intervention group will receive access to the functions of the “alley” app. The app presents informative (e.g., information about osteoarthritis), organizational (e.g., information about medical rehabilitation), and emotional/empowerment (e.g., information about the relationship between mood and pain) content. Patients evaluate their condition and functional level by means of standardized digitally questionnaires. Patients in the control group will not receive any functions of the app. Assessments will be performed at baseline before, 10 days after, 1 months after, 3 months after, 6 months after, and 12 months after TJA. Primary outcome is change from baseline measured by the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 3 months after TJA. The statistical analysis (t-test for independent variables with effect size Cohen’s d) is performed separately for patients with TKA and THA. Discussion: Overall, the study aims to improve the understanding of the benefits of eHealth applications in the treatment of elderly patients with knee or hip arthroplasty. The approach is novel since a health care companion is combined with a digital information platform enabling direct and continuous feedback from the patients to the therapeutic treatment team. As the study investigate the effectiveness under everyday conditions, it is not feasible to control whether the patients in the IG read the educational information of the app respectively the control group consume additional information from other sources. However, this increases the external validity of the study if significant effects for the app can be demonstrated. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00025608. Registered on 21 June 2021.

Background: The aim of this study was to categorize reasons for failure and to analyze the survivorship of multiple total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revisions. Methods: The study retrospectively evaluated all multiple TKA revisions performed between 2005 and 2015 at the authors’ institutions. Sixty-three patients (35 female, 28 male, age 64 ± 10 years, follow-up 55 ± 36 months) underwent a total of 157 re-revision TKA surgeries (range 2–5). The revision indications were divided up into main diagnoses. Survivorship was evaluated by mixed model analysis. Results: The main overall reason for re-revision was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (48%), followed by instability (12%), polyethylene wear (11%), malpositioning (8%), and aseptic loosening (8%). Survivorship shortened with an increasing number of revision surgeries (p = 0.003). While PJI was in 38% of all cases, the reason for the first revision, incidence increased constantly with the number of revisions (48% at second revision, 55% at third revision, 86% at fourth revision, and 100% at fifth revision, p = 0.022). If periprosthetic infection caused the first revision, patients showed an average of two more septic revisions at follow-up than patients with an aseptic first revision indication (p < 0.001). In 36% of cases, the reason for follow-up surgery in case of periprosthetic infection was again PJI. Conclusion: The probability of survival of the implanted knee arthroplasty is significantly reduced with each subsequent revision. Periprosthetic infection is the main cause of multiple revisions.

Purpose: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the use of simultaneous hip and knee arthroplasty compared to staged procedures in patients with bilateral pathology. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous and staged hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with bilateral pathology by assessing the transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin drop, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital complications, 30-day readmissions and early functional outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA, THA and UKA by a single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center between 2015 and 2020 as simultaneous or staged procedures. Staged bilateral arthroplasties were performed within 12 months and were stratified by the time between procedures. Data were acquired through the electronic files at the Orthopädische Chirurgie München (OCM). For functional outcome, the ability of the patients to walk independently on the ward was compared with the ability to walk a set of stairs alone, which was recorded daily by the attending physiotherapist. Results: In total n = 305 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this study. One hundred and forty-five patients were allocated to the staged arthroplasty group. This group was subdivided into a hip and a knee group, whereas the knee group was split into TKA and UKA. The second staged procedure was performed within 12 months of the first procedure. One hundred and sixty patients were allocated to the simultaneous arthroplasty group. This group was also subdivided into a hip and knee group, whereas the knee group was split again into a TKA and UKA group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: There was no significant difference in the transfusion rate or complication rate. Secondarily, no statistically significant difference was found between the postoperative hemoglobin drop and the functional outcome, or in the length of stay (LOS) between both groups. Walking the stairs showed a significant difference in the knee group. Conclusions: There were no significant differences observed in the transfusion rate in-hospital complications, or readmission rate between both groups. The early functional outcome showed no significant difference in mobility for all groups. Simultaneous arthroplasty for knee or hip is as safe as a staged procedure, with no higher risk for the patient, in a specialized high-volume center. Level of evidence: Level IV.