Kamal Ranaweera
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Kamal Ranaweera has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Geoffrey Rockwell
University of Alberta
2 shared publications - Heather Graves
University of Alberta
1 shared publication Janaka Ruwanpura
Professor, Canada Research Chair in Project Management Systems, and Director of the Centre for Project Management Excellence, Schulich School of Engineering, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4
1 shared publication- Janaka Y. Ruwanpura
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
1 shared publication - Jinman Zhang
University of Alberta
1 shared publication - Kaitlyn Grant
University of Alberta
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 3 June 2020
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique
- Vol. 10 (1)
Absorbing DiRT: Tool Directories in the Digital Age
- 3 June 2020
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique
- Vol. 10 (1)
Open AccessAbsorbing DiRT: Tool Directories in the Digital Age
- Open Access
- 16 April 2019
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique
- Vol. 9 (1)
Introduction to a Class-based Online Writing Environment: Gwrit (Game of Writing)
- 16 April 2019
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Digital Studies / Le Champ Numérique
- Vol. 9 (1)
Open AccessIntroduction to a Class-based Online Writing Environment: Gwrit (Game of Writing)
- 13 May 2014
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- p. 1023-1032
Evaluation of the State-of-the-Art Automated Construction Progress Monitoring and Control Systems
Efficient onsite data acquisition of a construction project enables the comparison of the actual state of the project to the as-plan state so that potential delays can be identified early within the project life cycle. Traditionally, onsite data are collected manually, a time consuming, costly and error-prone task, and therefore not justifiable in modern construction management. To overcome the challenges corresponding to such manual approaches, the application of automated progress monitoring of construction sites has attracted the attention of researchers. To enable an effective application, it is necessary to evaluate the reliability of the available technologies in collecting onsite data. In this paper, a qualitative evaluation of the applicability of the state-of-the-art automated progress monitoring technologies, namely camera, LiDAR, and 3D range imaging, has been carried out. A set of experiments has been carried out to compare the time of data collection for each technology. LiDAR provides the most accurate 3D estimates. The time of data collection of the Leica HDS6100 laser scanner is shown to be seven times faster than that of the DSLR camera in an indoor construction site simulated laboratory. However, the cost of LiDAR devices is the major economical drawback of the technology.
- 13 May 2014
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- p. 1023-1032
Evaluation of the State-of-the-Art Automated Construction Progress Monitoring and Control Systems
Efficient onsite data acquisition of a construction project enables the comparison of the actual state of the project to the as-plan state so that potential delays can be identified early within the project life cycle. Traditionally, onsite data are collected manually, a time consuming, costly and error-prone task, and therefore not justifiable in modern construction management. To overcome the challenges corresponding to such manual approaches, the application of automated progress monitoring of construction sites has attracted the attention of researchers. To enable an effective application, it is necessary to evaluate the reliability of the available technologies in collecting onsite data. In this paper, a qualitative evaluation of the applicability of the state-of-the-art automated progress monitoring technologies, namely camera, LiDAR, and 3D range imaging, has been carried out. A set of experiments has been carried out to compare the time of data collection for each technology. LiDAR provides the most accurate 3D estimates. The time of data collection of the Leica HDS6100 laser scanner is shown to be seven times faster than that of the DSLR camera in an indoor construction site simulated laboratory. However, the cost of LiDAR devices is the major economical drawback of the technology.
- 1 January 2013
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
- Vol. 27 (1) , 68-77
Automated Real-Time Monitoring System to Measure Shift Production of Tunnel Construction Projects
The productivity of a tunnel construction project can deviate from the predicted plan due to many factors, such as equipment failure, weather conditions and unexpected soil characteristics. Early detection of such deviations can help management teams to reallocate resources and take necessary actions to maximize the productivity. The real-time monitoring of actual productivity would yield tremendous information toward this end, but such monitoring is difficult, especially with remote construction sites. Therefore, the common practice has been to periodically obtain manually generated aggregated productivity reports from sites. These aggregated reports are not available to both site and office management in real time and may lack detailed information. To avoid these drawbacks, the research presented in this paper proposes an automated tunnel construction monitoring system to measure the productivity of the tunnel construction in terms of shift production (meters/shift). This system computes the shi...
- 1 January 2013
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
- Vol. 27 (1) , 68-77
Automated Real-Time Monitoring System to Measure Shift Production of Tunnel Construction Projects
The productivity of a tunnel construction project can deviate from the predicted plan due to many factors, such as equipment failure, weather conditions and unexpected soil characteristics. Early detection of such deviations can help management teams to reallocate resources and take necessary actions to maximize the productivity. The real-time monitoring of actual productivity would yield tremendous information toward this end, but such monitoring is difficult, especially with remote construction sites. Therefore, the common practice has been to periodically obtain manually generated aggregated productivity reports from sites. These aggregated reports are not available to both site and office management in real time and may lack detailed information. To avoid these drawbacks, the research presented in this paper proposes an automated tunnel construction monitoring system to measure the productivity of the tunnel construction in terms of shift production (meters/shift). This system computes the shi...