KSKeirith A. Snyder

Keirith A. Snyder

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Keirith A. Snyder has a total of 119 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Population-level differences in Pinus monophylla whole-plant seedling strategies under varying water pulse regimes

    by Jeremy S Adkins, Alexandra K Urza, Keirith A Snyder, Peter J Weisberg

    Forest persistence amid shifting climate conditions requires sufficient tree recruitment for sustaining populations. In dryland ecosystems where precipitation can be episodic and variable, changes in precipitation pulse regimes may be critically important for seedling establishment, as some populations may be locally adapted to variable resource availability. We conducted a greenhouse common garden experiment to evaluate Pinus monophylla seedling responses to varying watering pulse regimes. We used seeds from four sites representing endpoints of range-wide gradients of climatic water deficit and summer precipitation. Seedlings received the same amount of total water, but the water was applied in three different pulse patterns. We compared morphological and physiological traits in response to the three watering regimes, exploring whether responses were consistent with possible local adaptations. Seedlings demonstrated substantial trait differences among seed sources but few differences among water pulse treatments. Multivariate analysis of seedling traits suggested that seed source climate was related to two trade-offs in resource-use strategies: (i) acquisitive leaf traits versus seedling biomass and (ii) water use efficiency versus nitrogen use efficiency. A better understanding of intraspecific trait variation (ITV) can facilitate predictions of drought and temperature responses and help to identify suitable seed sources for P. monophylla restoration. While observed levels of ITV provide indirect evidence of local adaptation, this variation was not related to different precipitation pulse responses. However, the observed relationship between seed source climate and patterns of ITV suggests that local resource-use strategies underlying successful tree regeneration may constrain responses to a changing climate.

  • Open Access

    Variation in patterns of production and water-use efficiency among agroecosystems

    by Olivia L. Hajek, Nicole E. Kaplan, Shefali Azad, Philip A. Fay, Makki Khorchani, Amanda M. Nelson, Adam P. Schreiner-McGraw, Lori J. Abendroth, Claire Baffaut, John Baker, et al.


  • Do trees use stemflow water? A manipulative experiment on Singleleaf piñon and Utah juniper in Great Basin woodlands

    by Keirith A Snyder, Amira C Morrow, Tamzen K Stringham, Scott T Allen

    It has been postulated that stemflow, precipitation that flows from plant crowns down along branches and stems to soils, benefits plants that generate it because it increases plant-available soil water near the base of the plant; however, little direct evidence supports this postulation. Were plants’ crowns to preferentially route water to their roots, woody plants with large canopies could benefit. For example, piñon and juniper tree encroachment into sagebrush steppe ecosystems could be facilitated by intercepted precipitation routed to tree roots as stemflow, hypothetically reducing water available for shrubs and grasses. We tested whether Great Basin piñon and juniper trees use and benefit from stemflow. In a drier-than-average and wetter-than-average water year, isotopically labeled water was applied to tree stems to simulate stemflow. Both species took up stemflow, with label signals peaking and receding over 2–4 days. Despite this uptake, no alleviation of water stress was detected in the drier year. The stemflow uptake resulted in some water stress alleviation in the wetter year, specifically for piñons, which took up water from deeper in the soil profile than did junipers. Mixing model analyses suggested that stemflow was a small fraction of the water in stems (⁓0–2%), but an order-of-magnitude larger fraction of the stemflow was transpired in those few days after addition. These findings represent a novel demonstration of the rapid uptake and use of stemflow that infiltrates the rhizosphere, but they also prompt questions about the remaining stemflow’s fate and why alleviation of water stress was so minor.


  • Open Access

    Shifts in sage-grouse arthropod food sources across grazing and environmental gradients in upland meadow communities

    by William Richardson, Tamzen K. Stringham, Andrew B. Nuss, Brian Morra, Keirith A. Snyder

  • Open Access

    Agricultural Research Service Weed Science Research: Past, Present, and Future

    by Stephen L. Young, James V. Anderson, Scott R. Baerson, Joanna Bajsa-Hirschel, Dana M. Blumenthal, Chad S. Boyd, Clyde D. Boyette, Eric B. Brennan, Charles L. Cantrell, Wun S. Chao, et al.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) has been a leader in weed science research covering topics ranging from the development and use of integrated weed management (IWM) tactics to basic mechanistic studies, including biotic resistance of desirable plant communities and herbicide resistance. ARS weed scientists have worked in agricultural and natural ecosystems, including agronomic and horticultural crops, pastures, forests, wild lands, aquatic habitats, wetlands, and riparian areas. Through strong partnerships with academia, state agencies, private industry, and numerous federal programs, ARS weed scientists have made contributions to discoveries in the newest fields of robotics and genetics, as well as the traditional and fundamental subjects of weed–crop competition and physiology and integration of weed control tactics and practices. Weed science at ARS is often overshadowed by other research topics; thus, few are aware of the long history of ARS weed science and its important contributions. This review is the result of a symposium held at the Weed Science Society of America’s 62nd Annual Meeting in 2022 that included 10 separate presentations in a virtual Weed Science Webinar Series. The overarching themes of management tactics (IWM, biological control, and automation), basic mechanisms (competition, invasive plant genetics, and herbicide resistance), and ecosystem impacts (invasive plant spread, climate change, conservation, and restoration) represent core ARS weed science research that is dynamic and efficacious and has been a significant component of the agency’s national and international efforts. This review highlights current studies and future directions that exemplify the science and collaborative relationships both within and outside ARS. Given the constraints of weeds and invasive plants on all aspects of food, feed, and fiber systems, there is an acknowledged need to face new challenges, including agriculture and natural resources sustainability, economic resilience and reliability, and societal health and well-being.


  • Stable isotope approaches and opportunities for improving plant conservation

    by Keirith A Snyder, Sharon A Robinson, Susanne Schmidt, Kevin R Hultine

    Successful conservation of threatened species and ecosystems in a rapidly changing world requires scientifically sound decision-making tools that are readily accessible to conservation practitioners. Physiological applications that examine how plants and animals interact with their environment are now widely used when planning, implementing and monitoring conservation. Among these tools, stable-isotope physiology is a potentially powerful, yet under-utilized cornerstone of current and future conservation efforts of threatened and endangered plants. We review the underlying concepts and theory of stable-isotope physiology and describe how stable-isotope applications can support plant conservation. We focus on stable isotopes of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen to address plant ecophysiological responses to changing environmental conditions across temporal scales from hours to centuries. We review examples from a broad range of plant taxa, life forms and habitats and provide specific examples where stable-isotope analysis can directly improve conservation, in part by helping identify resilient, locally adapted genotypes or populations. Our review aims to provide a guide for practitioners to easily access and evaluate the information that can be derived from stable-isotope signatures, their limitations and how stable isotopes can improve conservation efforts.


  • Rainfall interception by mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentataspp.vaseyana): Dryland shrub canopy cover affects net precipitation

    by Devon K. Snyder, Tamzen K. Stringham, Keirith A. Snyder

    Canopy interception loss is an important component of the water budget for many ecosystems, and may be particularly influential in semi‐arid shrublands where water is limiting. In this experiment, we quantified interception loss by mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana)using simulated rainfall events in the field. Various levels of canopy cover and rainfall intensities were tested to measure their effects on net precipitation and interception loss. Additionally, the comparisons were made between three methods of measuring shrub cover to enhance the scalability of results. Stands of sagebrush from 20% to 50% canopy cover intercepted 18.5 ± 12.5% of incoming precipitation. Percent interception loss differed by 13.7% between the high and low cover classes, indicating that net precipitation may be significantly reduced under mature, dense stands of sagebrush. Hemispherical photography was a viable method for estimating canopy cover in this vegetation type. Interception loss by sagebrush was 14% lower on average than pinyon and juniper measured in the same watershed. Results from this study quantified the effects of sagebrush canopy on rainfall interception and improved understanding of vegetation dynamics in the sagebrush steppe.


  • Open Access

    Changes in Meadow Phenology in Response to Grazing Management at Multiple Scales of Measurement

    by William Richardson, Tamzen K. Stringham, Wade Lieurance, Keirith A. Snyder

    Riparian and ground-water dependent ecosystems found in the Great Basin of North America are heavily utilized by livestock and wildlife throughout the year. Due to this constant pressure, grazing can be a major influence on many groundwater dependent resources. It is important for land managers to understand how intensity and timing of grazing affect the temporal availability of these commodities (i.e., biodiversity, water filtration, forage, habitat). Shifts in forage or water availability could potentially be harmful for fauna that rely on them at specific times of the year. Seven meadow communities, each consisting of three distinct vegetative communities, were grazed at three intensities to determine the relationship between grazing management and phenological timing of vegetation. The agreement of on-the-ground measurements, near-surface digital cameras (phenocams), and satellite-based indices of greenness was examined for a two-year period (2019–2020) over these grazing and vegetative community gradients. Field determined phenology, phenocam Green Chromatic Coordinate (GCC), and Landsat Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were all highly correlated and the relationship did not change across the treatments. Timing of growth varied in these ecosystems depending on yearly precipitation and vegetative type. Communities dominated by mesic sedges had growing seasons which stopped earlier in the year. Heavier grazing regimes, however, did not equate to significant changes in growing season. Ultimately, shifts in phenology occurred and were successfully monitored at various spatial and temporal scales.


  • Longer term effects of biological control on tamarisk evapotranspiration and carbon dioxide exchange

    by Keirith A. Snyder, Russell L. Scott

    Biological control of Tamarix spp. (tamarisk) with Diorhabda spp. (tamarisk beetle) was initiated in several states in the Western United States in 2001. We analysed 12 years of evapotranspiration (ET), net ecosystem production (NEP), and beetle abundance data from a tamarisk‐invaded site in Western Nevada along the Truckee River. Diorhabda carinulata (northern tamarisk beetle) appeared at the site in 2007. Large beetle outbreaks and associated defoliation of the tamarisk occurred in 2008 and 2009, then the beetle population was highly variable from year to year. Since 2016, the beetle population declined. Growing season ET noticeably declined from direct beetle herbivory in 2008, 2009, and 2010, but the decline in ET was seasonally transient as trees regrew leaves. In 2012 and 2013, total growing season ET was low, likely due to the combined effects of drought and beetle herbivory pressure. Total seasonal ET losses and NEP were primarily driven by annual precipitation with higher values in wetter years and reduced values when precipitation fell below 100 mm. In the last 2 years of the study, 2017–2018, there were few to no beetles observed at the site, and we measured increased tamarisk leaf area index, ET, and NEP. Since 2010 at the study site, no further releases of the beetles have occurred due to wildlife concerns, and subsequent declines in beetle populations where such that the “outbreak” conditions apparently required to impair tamarisk physiological function and significantly reduce ET have not occurred. ET and photosynthesis were highly correlated (r2 ≥ .91) to the Landsat‐satellite normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Using a relationship between growing season ET and NDVI, we estimated ET for five additional tamarisk sites along several southwestern U.S. rivers. In the 2005 to 2018 analysis period, NDVI‐estimated ET declined at all sites after beetle arrival with three sites showing a recovery in pre‐beetle ET rates in subsequent years. At the other three sites, ET rates have not recovered to pre‐beetle levels.


  • Open Access

    Comparison of Landsat and Land-Based Phenology Camera Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for Dominant Plant Communities in the Great Basin

    by Keirith A. Snyder, Justin L. Huntington, Bryce L. Wehan, Charles G. Morton, Tamzen K. Stringham

    Phenology of plants is important for ecological interactions. The timing and development of green leaves, plant maturity, and senescence affects biophysical interactions of plants with the environment. In this study we explored the agreement between land-based camera and satellite-based phenology metrics to quantify plant phenology and phenophases dates in five plant community types characteristic of the semi-arid cold desert region of the Great Basin. Three years of data were analyzed. We calculated the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for both land-based cameras (i.e., phenocams) and Landsat imagery. NDVI from camera images was calculated by taking a standard RGB (red, green, and blue) image and then a near infrared (NIR) plus RGB image. Phenocam NDVI was calculated by extracting the red digital number (DN) and the NIR DN from images taken a few seconds apart. Landsat has a spatial resolution of 30 m2, while phenocam spatial resolution can be analyzed at the single pixel level at the scale of cm2 or area averaged regions can be analyzed with scales up to 1 km2. For this study, phenocam regions of interest were used that approximated the scale of at least one Landsat pixel. In the tall-statured pinyon and juniper woodland sites, there was a lack of agreement in NDVI between phenocam and Landsat NDVI, even after using National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery to account for fractional coverage of pinyon and juniper versus interspace in the phenocam data. Landsat NDVI appeared to be dominated by the signal from the interspace and was insensitive to subtle changes in the pinyon and juniper tree canopy. However, for short-statured sagebrush shrub and meadow communities, there was good agreement between the phenocam and Landsat NDVI as reflected in high Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r > 0.75). Due to greater temporal resolution of the phenocams with images taken daily, versus the 16-day return interval of Landsat, phenocam data provided more utility in determining important phenophase dates: start of season, peak of season, and end of season. More specific species-level information can be obtained with the high temporal resolution of phenocams, but only for a limited number of sites, while Landsat can provide the multi-decadal history and spatial coverage that is unmatched by other platforms. The agreement between Landsat and phenocam NDVI for short-statured plant communities of the Great Basin, shows promise for monitoring landscape and regional-level plant phenology across large areas and time periods, with phenocams providing a more comprehensive understanding of plant phenology at finer spatial scales, and Landsat extending the historical record of observations.