Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Michael W. McDermott
University of California
3 shared publicationsNader Sanai
University of California
2 shared publicationsPhilip R. Weinstein
2 shared publicationsRuss Lyon
Department of Neurological Surgery and Neurophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
2 shared publicationsAndrew T. Parsa
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
1 shared publicationChikezie I. Eseonu
Department of Neurological Surgery and Oncology Outcomes Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 97, 317-325
Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas: Comparison of Outcomes During the Transition of Methods of a Single Surgeon
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 97, 317-325
Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas: Comparison of Outcomes During the Transition of Methods of a Single Surgeon
- 1 June 2007
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Vol. 62 (6) , E11-E13
Emergent Placement of Halo Orthosis After a Traumatic Cervical Injury Leading to a Cerebral Abscess
- 1 June 2007
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Vol. 62 (6) , E11-E13
Emergent Placement of Halo Orthosis After a Traumatic Cervical Injury Leading to a Cerebral Abscess
- 1 April 2006
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques
- Vol. 19 (2) , 109-113
Accuracy Over Space and Time of Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation in the Lumbar Spine In Vivo
The integration of digital image-guided surgical navigation with C-arm fluoroscopy, known as virtual fluoroscopy (VF), has been shown to enhance the safety of spine surgery in vitro. Few clinical studies have assessed the accuracy of VF during actual spinal surgery, and no studies have investigated variations in accuracy over the course of a series of measurements obtained during operative cases. We sought to study the intraoperative accuracy of VF over time and space during lumbar pedicle screw placement in human patients. Fluoroscopic images of the lumbar spine were obtained, calibrated, and saved to the Stealth Station (FluoroNav) on seven patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. The tracking arc was attached to an exposed lumbar spinous process, which was designated the index level. With use of anatomic surface irregularities in the laminae and spinous processes, several points were identified and registered on three different vertebrae directly adjacent to the index level vertebra. Every 15 minutes, throughout the operative case, the probe was brought to each point and the apparent distance from the original location recorded (as measured by the FluoroNav system). Measurements were collected from three vertebral levels adjacent to the index level over a time course of 120 minutes during the operation. At the index, index +1, index +2, and index +3 levels, 89%, 81%, 92%, and 64% of measurements were within <2 mm, whereas 97%, 96%, 97%, and 91% were within <3 mm, respectively. At 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, and 120 minutes, 96%, 89%, 85%, 61%, 85%, 90%, 93%, and 50% of measurements were within <2 mm, whereas 100%, 93%, 100%, 83%, 100%, 90%, 100%, and 100% of measurements were within <3 mm, respectively. The error in millimeters tended to increase as the distance from the index level increased (R = 0.19, P < 0.05) and as operative time increased (R = 0.26, P < 0.01). Calibration studies of intraoperative VF (IoVF) in the lumbar spine documented a reasonable degree of accuracy. The majority of sequential measurements obtained during IoVF in the lumbar spine were within an error range of <3 mm. Our results suggest that the use of VF is a reliable method of verifying the use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks for guidance during lumbar pedicle screw placement.
- 1 April 2006
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques
- Vol. 19 (2) , 109-113
Accuracy Over Space and Time of Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation in the Lumbar Spine In Vivo
The integration of digital image-guided surgical navigation with C-arm fluoroscopy, known as virtual fluoroscopy (VF), has been shown to enhance the safety of spine surgery in vitro. Few clinical studies have assessed the accuracy of VF during actual spinal surgery, and no studies have investigated variations in accuracy over the course of a series of measurements obtained during operative cases. We sought to study the intraoperative accuracy of VF over time and space during lumbar pedicle screw placement in human patients. Fluoroscopic images of the lumbar spine were obtained, calibrated, and saved to the Stealth Station (FluoroNav) on seven patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. The tracking arc was attached to an exposed lumbar spinous process, which was designated the index level. With use of anatomic surface irregularities in the laminae and spinous processes, several points were identified and registered on three different vertebrae directly adjacent to the index level vertebra. Every 15 minutes, throughout the operative case, the probe was brought to each point and the apparent distance from the original location recorded (as measured by the FluoroNav system). Measurements were collected from three vertebral levels adjacent to the index level over a time course of 120 minutes during the operation. At the index, index +1, index +2, and index +3 levels, 89%, 81%, 92%, and 64% of measurements were within <2 mm, whereas 97%, 96%, 97%, and 91% were within <3 mm, respectively. At 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, and 120 minutes, 96%, 89%, 85%, 61%, 85%, 90%, 93%, and 50% of measurements were within <2 mm, whereas 100%, 93%, 100%, 83%, 100%, 90%, 100%, and 100% of measurements were within <3 mm, respectively. The error in millimeters tended to increase as the distance from the index level increased (R = 0.19, P < 0.05) and as operative time increased (R = 0.26, P < 0.01). Calibration studies of intraoperative VF (IoVF) in the lumbar spine documented a reasonable degree of accuracy. The majority of sequential measurements obtained during IoVF in the lumbar spine were within an error range of <3 mm. Our results suggest that the use of VF is a reliable method of verifying the use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks for guidance during lumbar pedicle screw placement.
- 1 August 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 74 (1) , 19-30
Techniques to assess the proliferative potential of brain tumors
Assessment of brain tumor proliferative potential provides important prognostic information that supplements standard histopathologic grading. Many laboratories rely on mitotic figures to quantify the proliferative potential of brain tumors, but this conventional cellular proliferative index is subject to inter-observer variability and not consistently predictive for low-and high-grade tumors. Recent advancements in technology have made it possible to use proliferative indices as a standard supplement in pathology laboratories. Non-invasive tumor tissue measurements of cell proliferation can be performed using– bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (BrdU LI), flow cytometry (FCM), MIB-1 antibody to the Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and argyrophilic nucleolar organizing regions (AgNOR). Each of these assays has been described in the literature with respect to its ability to predict tumor grade or outcome. At the present time MIB-1 and AgNOR are the simplest and most reliable of these techniques. In addition, advances in our understanding of the genetic alterations associated with proliferation promise to provide more specific markers of proliferative potential. Beyond the pathology laboratory, radiographic studies such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and most recently magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have been used as follow-up measures, assessing response to treatment and tumor recurrence, rather than as predictors of response to treatment. These radiographic tools, however, have the potential to provide an assessment of tumor proliferation without the need for invasive measures. In this article, we present a review of the current techniques utilized to understand the proliferative potential of brain tumors.
- 1 August 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 74 (1) , 19-30
Techniques to assess the proliferative potential of brain tumors
Assessment of brain tumor proliferative potential provides important prognostic information that supplements standard histopathologic grading. Many laboratories rely on mitotic figures to quantify the proliferative potential of brain tumors, but this conventional cellular proliferative index is subject to inter-observer variability and not consistently predictive for low-and high-grade tumors. Recent advancements in technology have made it possible to use proliferative indices as a standard supplement in pathology laboratories. Non-invasive tumor tissue measurements of cell proliferation can be performed using– bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (BrdU LI), flow cytometry (FCM), MIB-1 antibody to the Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and argyrophilic nucleolar organizing regions (AgNOR). Each of these assays has been described in the literature with respect to its ability to predict tumor grade or outcome. At the present time MIB-1 and AgNOR are the simplest and most reliable of these techniques. In addition, advances in our understanding of the genetic alterations associated with proliferation promise to provide more specific markers of proliferative potential. Beyond the pathology laboratory, radiographic studies such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and most recently magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have been used as follow-up measures, assessing response to treatment and tumor recurrence, rather than as predictors of response to treatment. These radiographic tools, however, have the potential to provide an assessment of tumor proliferation without the need for invasive measures. In this article, we present a review of the current techniques utilized to understand the proliferative potential of brain tumors.
- 8 July 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 76 (1) , 65-70
Assessment of Image Guided Accuracy in a Skull Model: Comparison of Frameless Stereotaxy Techniques vs. Frame-Based Localization
The use of image-guided systems (IGS) for brain biopsy has increased in neurosurgical practice. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of a plastic, disposable burr hole mounted guide for stereotactic biopsy using an IGS and compare the results of different targeting methods with those of frame based localization.
- 8 July 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 76 (1) , 65-70
Assessment of Image Guided Accuracy in a Skull Model: Comparison of Frameless Stereotaxy Techniques vs. Frame-Based Localization
The use of image-guided systems (IGS) for brain biopsy has increased in neurosurgical practice. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of a plastic, disposable burr hole mounted guide for stereotactic biopsy using an IGS and compare the results of different targeting methods with those of frame based localization.
- 1 May 2005
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 56 (5) , 982-993
Changes in Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials during Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Resection Correlate with Postoperative Motor Function
OBJECTIVE:. Intraoperative monitoring of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) has been investigated recently as a means of preventing motor def
- 1 May 2005
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 56 (5) , 982-993
Changes in Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials during Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Resection Correlate with Postoperative Motor Function
OBJECTIVE:. Intraoperative monitoring of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) has been investigated recently as a means of preventing motor def
- 1 April 2005
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Operative Neurosurgery
- Vol. 56 (suppl_4) , ONS-E439-E439
Intraoperative Motor Mapping of the Cerebral Peduncle during Resection of a Midbrain Cavernous Malformation: Technical Case Report
OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Brainstem cavernous malformations that seem to come to a pial or ependymal surface on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies may, in fact, be covered by an intact layer of neural tissue. For cavernous malformations in the cerebral peduncle, intraoperative stimulation mapping with a miniaturized probe can determine whether this overlying tissue harbors fibers in the corticospinal tract. In addition, intermittent monitoring with transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) helps to protect this vital pathway during resection of the lesion. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 20-year-old woman collapsed after a cavernous malformation in the left cerebral peduncle hemorrhaged into the pons, midbrain, and thalamus. She presented with right hemiparesis and left oculomotor palsy. INTERVENTION: The cavernous malformation was completely resected through a left orbitozygomatic craniotomy and transsylvian approach. Stimulation mapping of the cerebral peduncle with a Kartush probe (Medtronic Xomed, Inc., Jacksonville, FL) identified the corticospinal tract lateral to the lesion, and a layer of tissue over the lesion harbored no motor fibers. TcMEP monitoring helped to guide the resection, with increased voltage thresholds and altered waveform morphologies indicating transient impaired motor conduction. All TcMEP changes returned to baseline by the end of the procedure, and the patient's hemiparesis improved after surgery. CONCLUSION: Stimulation mapping of the corticospinal tract and intermittent TcMEPs is a safe and simple surgical adjunct. Expanded monitoring of the motor pathway during the resection of cerebral peduncle cavernous malformations may improve the safety of these operations.
- 1 April 2005
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Operative Neurosurgery
- Vol. 56 (suppl_4) , ONS-E439-E439
Intraoperative Motor Mapping of the Cerebral Peduncle during Resection of a Midbrain Cavernous Malformation: Technical Case Report
OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Brainstem cavernous malformations that seem to come to a pial or ependymal surface on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies may, in fact, be covered by an intact layer of neural tissue. For cavernous malformations in the cerebral peduncle, intraoperative stimulation mapping with a miniaturized probe can determine whether this overlying tissue harbors fibers in the corticospinal tract. In addition, intermittent monitoring with transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) helps to protect this vital pathway during resection of the lesion. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 20-year-old woman collapsed after a cavernous malformation in the left cerebral peduncle hemorrhaged into the pons, midbrain, and thalamus. She presented with right hemiparesis and left oculomotor palsy. INTERVENTION: The cavernous malformation was completely resected through a left orbitozygomatic craniotomy and transsylvian approach. Stimulation mapping of the cerebral peduncle with a Kartush probe (Medtronic Xomed, Inc., Jacksonville, FL) identified the corticospinal tract lateral to the lesion, and a layer of tissue over the lesion harbored no motor fibers. TcMEP monitoring helped to guide the resection, with increased voltage thresholds and altered waveform morphologies indicating transient impaired motor conduction. All TcMEP changes returned to baseline by the end of the procedure, and the patient's hemiparesis improved after surgery. CONCLUSION: Stimulation mapping of the corticospinal tract and intermittent TcMEPs is a safe and simple surgical adjunct. Expanded monitoring of the motor pathway during the resection of cerebral peduncle cavernous malformations may improve the safety of these operations.