Jung Kyoon Choi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Jung Kyoon Choi has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ook Joon Yoo
1 shared publicationSangsoo Kim
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
1 shared publication- Seungjin Lee
College of AI/SW Convergence, Kyungnam University, 7 Gyeongnamdaehak-ro, Masanhappo-gu, Changwon 51767, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication Ungsik Yu
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
1 shared publication- Yonggyu Lee
KAIST
1 shared publication - Yonghoon Choi
DaejeonKorea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 27 November 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Photonic Network Communications
- Vol. 21 (2) , 152-157
Performance analysis of OBS networks using the effective bandwidth method
- 27 November 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Photonic Network Communications
- Vol. 21 (2) , 152-157
Performance analysis of OBS networks using the effective bandwidth method
- Open Access
- 3 July 2003
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 19 (suppl_1) , i84-i90
Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation
We have established a method for systematic integration of multiple microarray datasets. The method was applied to two different sets of cancer profiling studies. The change of gene expression in cancer was expressed as ’ effect size’, a standardized index measuring the magnitude of a treatment or covariate effect. The effect sizes were combined to obtain the estimate of the overall mean. The statistical significance was determined by a permutation test extended to multiple datasets. It was shown that the data integration promotes the discovery of small but consistent expression changes with increased sensitivity and reliability. The effect size methods provided the efficient modeling framework for addressing interstudy variation as well. Based on the result of homogeneity tests, a fixed effects model was adopted for one set of datasets that had been created in controlled experimental conditions. By contrast, a random effects model was shown to be appropriate for the other set of datasets that had been published by independent groups. We also developed an alternative modeling procedure based on a Bayesian approach, which would offer flexibility and robustness compared to the classical procedure. Contact: jkchoi@kaist.ac.kr Keywords: microarray, meta-analysis, effect size, Bayesian meta-analysis *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
- 3 July 2003
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 19 (suppl_1) , i84-i90
Open AccessCombining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation
We have established a method for systematic integration of multiple microarray datasets. The method was applied to two different sets of cancer profiling studies. The change of gene expression in cancer was expressed as ’ effect size’, a standardized index measuring the magnitude of a treatment or covariate effect. The effect sizes were combined to obtain the estimate of the overall mean. The statistical significance was determined by a permutation test extended to multiple datasets. It was shown that the data integration promotes the discovery of small but consistent expression changes with increased sensitivity and reliability. The effect size methods provided the efficient modeling framework for addressing interstudy variation as well. Based on the result of homogeneity tests, a fixed effects model was adopted for one set of datasets that had been created in controlled experimental conditions. By contrast, a random effects model was shown to be appropriate for the other set of datasets that had been published by independent groups. We also developed an alternative modeling procedure based on a Bayesian approach, which would offer flexibility and robustness compared to the classical procedure. Contact: jkchoi@kaist.ac.kr Keywords: microarray, meta-analysis, effect size, Bayesian meta-analysis *To whom correspondence should be addressed.