Alessandro Bellis

The aim was to assess the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) treatment on the progression of ascending aorta dilatation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A total of 127 T2DM patients with subclinical ascending aortic dilatation (35–45 mm) were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-seven initiated GLP-1 RA therapy (liraglutide, semaglutide, or dulaglutide), while 70 continued on standard care. Ascending aortic diameter was measured by computed tomography angiography (CTA) at baseline and 24 months, alongside circulating markers of vascular remodeling: matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), C-reactive protein (CRP), and osteoprotegerin (OPG). Progression of aortic dilatation was significantly lower in the GLP-1 RA group compared with controls (+0.36 ± 0.20 mm vs. +1.05 ± 0.28 mm; p < 0.001). Therapy correlated with decreased MMP-9 and CRP (p < 0.01) and increased TIMP-1 and OPG (p < 0.05). The use of GLP-1 RA was an independent predictor of low progression, even in multivariate models after adjusting for demographic, metabolic, and biomarker data. GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with reduced progression of ascending aortic dilatation in T2DM, supporting a potential vasoprotective role beyond glucose lowering.

Background: The “fast track” addition (within 48 h) of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) to the optimized oral lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) during hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been shown to rapidly achieve the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic targets. However, so far, its efficacy in real-world settings remains understudied. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 ACS patients treated at our center, comparing “PCSK9i fast track” use within 48 h to standard “stepwise” LLT. Lipid levels and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were evaluated at 30 and 180 days. Results: The “PCSK9i fast track” group achieved significantly lower LDL-C levels at 30 days (41.5 ± 27.5 vs. 85.6 ± 35.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and 180 days (29.6 ± 21.0 vs. 59.0 ± 32.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Recommended LDL-C targets (p < 0.001). No significant differences in MACEs were observed between groups. No adverse effects from PCSK9i use were noted. Conclusions: The “PCSK9i fast track” strategy was safe and effective in achieving LDL-C targets more rapidly than conventional approaches in real-world ACS patients.

The significant reduction in ‘ischemic time’ through capillary diffusion of primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) has rendered myocardial-ischemia reperfusion injury (MIRI) prevention a major issue in order to improve the prognosis of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. In fact, while the ischemic damage increases with the severity and the duration of blood flow reduction, reperfusion injury reaches its maximum with a moderate amount of ischemic injury. MIRI leads to the development of post-STEMI left ventricular remodeling (post-STEMI LVR), thereby increasing the risk of arrhythmias and heart failure. Single pharmacological and mechanical interventions have shown some benefits, but have not satisfactorily reduced mortality. Therefore, a multitarget therapeutic strategy is needed, but no univocal indications have come from the clinical trials performed so far. On the basis of the results of the consistent clinical studies analyzed in this review, we try to design a randomized clinical trial aimed at evaluating the effects of a reasoned multitarget therapeutic strategy on the prevention of post-STEMI LVR. In fact, we believe that the correct timing of pharmacological and mechanical intervention application, according to their specific ability to interfere with survival pathways, may significantly reduce the incidence of post-STEMI LVR and thus improve patient prognosis.

Stress-induced hyperglycaemia (SIH) at hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome is associated with poor outcome, especially in patients without known diabetes. Nevertheless, insulin treatment in these subjects was not correlated with the reduction of mortality. This is likely due to the fact that SIH in the context of an acute coronary syndrome, compared to that in known diabetes, represents an epiphenomenon of other pathological conditions, such as adrenergic and renin-angiotensin system over-activity, hyperglucagonaemia, increase of circulating free fatty acids and pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction, which are not completely reversed by insulin therapy and so worsen the prognosis. Thus, SIH may be considered not only as a biomarker of organ damage, but also as an indicator of a more complex therapeutic strategy in these subjects. The aim of this review is to analyse the molecular mechanisms by which SIH may favour a worse prognosis in non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome and identify new therapeutic strategies, in addition to insulin therapy, for a more appropriate treatment and improved outcomes.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) determines the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) down-regulation and related decrease in angiotensin II degradation. Both these events trigger “cytokine storm” leading to acute lung and cardiovascular injury. A selective therapy for COVID-19 has not yet been identified. Clinical trials with remdesivir gave discordant results. Thus, healthcare systems have focused on “multi-targeted” therapeutic strategies aiming at relieving systemic inflammation and thrombotic complications. No randomized clinical trial has demonstrated the efficacy of renin angiotensin system antagonists in reducing inflammation related to COVID-19. Dexamethasone and tocilizumab showed encouraging data, but their use needs to be further validated. The still-controversial efficacy of these treatments highlighted the importance of organ injury prevention in COVID-19. Neprilysin (NEP) might be an interesting target for this purpose. NEP expression is increased by cytokines on lung fibroblasts surface. NEP activity is elevated in acute respiratory distress syndrome and it is conceivable that it is also high in COVID-19. NEP is implicated in the degradation of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, substance P, adrenomedullin, and apelin that account for prevention of organ injury. Thus, NEP/angiotensin receptor type 1 (AT1R) inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) may increase levels of these molecules and block AT1Rs required for ACE2 endocytosis in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, SAC/VAL has a positive impact on acute heart failure that is very frequently observed in deceased COVID-19 patients. The current review aims to summarize actual therapeutic strategies for COVID-19 and to examine the data supporting the potential benefits of SAC/VAL in COVID-19 treatment.

During the last three decades, timely myocardial reperfusion using either thrombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) has allowed amazing improvements in outcomes with a more than halving in 1-year ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) mortality. However, mortality and left ventricle (LV) remodeling remain substantial in these patients. As such, novel therapeutic interventions are required to reduce myocardial infarction size, preserve LV systolic function, and improve survival in reperfused-STEMI patients. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) prevention represents the main goal to reach in order to reduce STEMI mortality. There is currently no effective therapy for MIRI prevention in STEMI patients. A significant reason for the weak and inconsistent results obtained in this field may be the presence of multiple, partially redundant, mechanisms of cell death during ischemia-reperfusion, whose relative importance may depend on the conditions. Therefore, it is always more recognized that it is important to consider a “multi-targeted cardioprotective therapy”, defined as an additive or synergistic cardioprotective agents or interventions directed to distinct targets with different timing of application (before, during, or after pPCI). Given that some neprilysin (NEP) substrates (natriuretic peptides, angiotensin II, bradykinin, apelins, substance P, and adrenomedullin) exert a cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury, it is conceivable that antagonism of proteolytic activity by this enzyme may be considered in a multi-targeted strategy for MIRI prevention. In this review, by starting from main pathophysiological mechanisms promoting MIRI, we discuss cardioprotective effects of NEP substrates and the potential benefit of NEP pharmacological inhibition in MIRI prevention.

The aims of this study were to assess whether ischemic preconditioning (PC) induces bradykinin (Bk) synthesis in bovine aortic endothelial cells (bAECs) and, if so, to explore the molecular mechanisms by which this peptide provides cytoprotection against hypoxia. PC was induced by exposing bAECs to three cycles of 15 min of hypoxia followed by 15 min of reoxygenation. Bk synthesis peaked in correspondence to the early and late phases of PC (10⁻¹² M and 10⁻¹¹ M, respectively) and was abolished by a selective tissue kallikrein inhibitor, aprotinin. Stimulation with exogenous Bk at concentrations of 10⁻¹² M and 10⁻¹¹ M reduced the cell death induced by 12 h of hypoxia by 50%. Pretreatment with HOE−140, a Bk receptor 2 (BKR2) inhibitor, in bAECs exposed to 12 h of hypoxia, abrogated the cytoprotective effect of early and late PC, whereas des-Arg-HOE-140, a Bk receptor 1 (BKR1) inhibitor, affected only the late PC. In addition, we found that PC evoked endocytosis and the recycling of BKR2 during both the early and late phases, and that inhibition of these pathways affected PC-mediated cytoprotection. Finally, we evaluated the activation of PKA and Akt in the presence or absence of BKR2 inhibitor. HOE-140 abrogated PKA and Akt activation during both early and late PC. Consistently, BKR2 inhibition abolished cross-talk between PKA and Akt in PC. In bAECs, Bk-synthesis evoked by PC mediates the protection against both apoptotic and necrotic hypoxia-induced cell death in an autocrine manner, by both BKR2- and BKR1-dependent mechanisms.

Metabolic syndrome is not a discrete entity with a single pathogenesis, but different complex mechanisms, especially those inducing oxidative stress, play a major role in the genesis of this condition. This consideration suggests that treatment of recognized cardiovascular risk factors alone cannot be enough to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with a diagnosed metabolic syndrome. However, it has been reported that oxidative stress is involved in the transduction of the effects of haemodynamic and metabolic pathological conditions. Thus, drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers], or on the glucose or lipid metabolism as substrate of oxidative mechanisms (statins and nutraceuticals) in association with a dietary restriction may be taken in account, because they play a synergistic effect in preventing functional and structural changes responsible for the high cardiovascular risk in metabolic syndrome.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT1 receptor blockers have long been considered as two classes of drugs with strictly comparable effect in cardiovascular diseases, on the assumption that both classes act on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The results of large clinical intervention trials, which failed to demonstrate any significant difference between the effects of these two pharmacological classes in patients with essential hypertension, acute myocardial infarction and heart failure, supported this concept. The recent observation that a combination of ACE-inhibitors and AT1 receptor blockers improves the prognosis of these pathological conditions better than monotherapy at higher doses focused on the difference between their mechanisms of action. The results of pathophysiological studies have suggested that in the heart, as well as in the kidney, AT1 receptor blockers act in the early stages of the disease, improving left ventricular dysfunction in hypertensive patients and preventing microalbuminuria in diabetic animals. It seems reliable to suggest that AT1 receptor blockers are to be preferred to ACE-inhibitors for an early prevention of cardiovascular and renal disease. The new inhibitors of renin activity may further amplify our chances, also blocking the negative effects mediated by angiotensin II escape and by stimulation of the prorenin/renin receptors.