Simone Manfredi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Simone Manfredi has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Rana Pant
European Commission - Joint Research Centre
3 shared publicationsAndreas Versmann
Unit C2–Sustainable Production and Consumption
1 shared publicationDavid Pennington
European Commission - Joint Research Centre
1 shared publicationDavid W. Pennington
Joint Research Centre (JRC)
1 shared publication- Erwin Meissner Schau
InnoRenew CoE, Livade 6, SI-6310 Isola-Izola, Slovenia
1 shared publication - Jorge Cristóbal
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D - Sustainable Resources, Bio-economy Unit, Via E. Fermi, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 11 July 2016
- Published by SAGE Publications in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Vol. 34 (9) , 957-968
Towards more sustainable management of European food waste: Methodological approach and numerical application
Trying to respond to the latest policy needs, the work presented in this article aims at developing a life-cycle based framework methodology to quantitatively evaluate the environmental and economic sustainability of European food waste management options. The methodology is structured into six steps aimed at defining boundaries and scope of the evaluation, evaluating environmental and economic impacts and identifying best performing options. The methodology is able to accommodate additional assessment criteria, for example the social dimension of sustainability, thus moving towards a comprehensive sustainability assessment framework. A numerical case study is also developed to provide an example of application of the proposed methodology to an average European context. Different options for food waste treatment are compared, including landfilling, composting, anaerobic digestion and incineration. The environmental dimension is evaluated with the software EASETECH, while the economic assessment is conducted based on different indicators expressing the costs associated with food waste management. Results show that the proposed methodology allows for a straightforward identification of the most sustainable options for food waste, thus can provide factual support to decision/policy making. However, it was also observed that results markedly depend on a number of user-defined assumptions, for example on the choice of the indicators to express the environmental and economic performance.
- 11 July 2016
- Published by SAGE Publications in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Vol. 34 (9) , 957-968
Towards more sustainable management of European food waste: Methodological approach and numerical application
Trying to respond to the latest policy needs, the work presented in this article aims at developing a life-cycle based framework methodology to quantitatively evaluate the environmental and economic sustainability of European food waste management options. The methodology is structured into six steps aimed at defining boundaries and scope of the evaluation, evaluating environmental and economic impacts and identifying best performing options. The methodology is able to accommodate additional assessment criteria, for example the social dimension of sustainability, thus moving towards a comprehensive sustainability assessment framework. A numerical case study is also developed to provide an example of application of the proposed methodology to an average European context. Different options for food waste treatment are compared, including landfilling, composting, anaerobic digestion and incineration. The environmental dimension is evaluated with the software EASETECH, while the economic assessment is conducted based on different indicators expressing the costs associated with food waste management. Results show that the proposed methodology allows for a straightforward identification of the most sustainable options for food waste, thus can provide factual support to decision/policy making. However, it was also observed that results markedly depend on a number of user-defined assumptions, for example on the choice of the indicators to express the environmental and economic performance.
- 8 January 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 20 (3) , 389-404
Comparing the European Commission product environmental footprint method with other environmental accounting methods
- 8 January 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 20 (3) , 389-404
Comparing the European Commission product environmental footprint method with other environmental accounting methods
- 6 October 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 18 (1) , 285-291
Improving the environmental performance of bio-waste management with life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA)
- 6 October 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 18 (1) , 285-291
Improving the environmental performance of bio-waste management with life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA)
- 1 July 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 16 (9) , 937-939
Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management with LCT and LCA
- 1 July 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Vol. 16 (9) , 937-939
Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management with LCT and LCA