Mark J. Truty

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at 2 tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). A total of 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression, and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2%–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 74.4%, 59.8% and 57.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved a 5-year OS of 82.4%. Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

BACKGROUND: The first total pancreatectomy (TP) resulting in survival past the immediate postoperative period was performed at Mayo Clinic in 1944. Although still uncommonly performed, indications have recently fluctuated. We aimed to evaluate trends in TP use and outcomes over four decades. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent single-stage TP at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 1988 to 2024 were analyzed in two cohorts: early era (EE, 1988 to 2009) and modern era (ME, 2010 to 2024). RESULTS: In total, 437 patients were identified: 118 during EE (mean 8 per year) and 319 during ME (mean 21 per year). Primary indications were adenocarcinoma (42% EE vs 60% ME), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (31% EE vs 17% ME), and chronic pancreatitis (11% EE vs 13% ME; p < 0.001). Concurrent vascular resection was performed in 9.3% (EE; all venous only) vs 53% (ME; venous alone in 20% and arterial with or without venous in 33%; p < 0.001). Multivisceral resection was performed in <1% (EE) vs 24% (ME; p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 13% (EE) vs 27% (ME; p = 0.018), and 90-day mortality was 3.4% (EE) vs 6.3% (ME; p = 0.35). For adenocarcinoma, 5-year median overall survival from both surgery and diagnosis was significantly improved in ME (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). Median last HbA1c was 7.7 (EE) vs 7.3 (ME; p < 0.001). Among patients surviving more than 1 year, insulin pumps were used in 12% (EE) vs 49% (ME; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of TP has dramatically increased in recent years, primarily for adenocarcinoma alongside increased use of neoadjuvant therapy and ever-expanding criteria for anatomic resectability. Operative complexity has significantly increased with resultant increased perioperative morbidity. TP remains a higher-risk procedure, specifically with en bloc vascular resections, emphasizing the importance of appropriate patient selection, preoperative patient education, and thoughtful postoperative and long-term management.

Background: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) commonly have occult metastatic dissemination and current standard staging methods have significant limitations in identifying these patients. A clinically available assay allows for the identification of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patient plasma and peritoneal fluid that may identify these patients and impact treatment decision making. We investigated the patterns of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of mKRAS ctDNA in patients with localized PDAC. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic PDAC were identified and underwent a full staging work-up during their first visit at our institution. Development of metastatic disease and long-term survival outcomes were assessed to compare between the mKRAS testing groups. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, 785 patients were evaluated. Among the 785 patients who underwent plasma mKRAS testing, 104 were mKRAS positive. Plasma mKRAS-positive patients were more likely to develop metastatic disease and had worse overall survival. In the 419 patients who underwent peritoneal mKRAS, 123 were mKRAS-positive and were more likely to harbor occult metastases or develop peritoneal rather than hematogenous metastases. For patients who underwent both baseline plasma and peritoneal mKRAS testing, any positive mKRAS test regardless of compartment was associated with worse outcomes. Conclusions: Detection of mKRAS ctDNA in plasma and peritoneal fluid of patients with localized PDAC is not only feasible but also identifies those at high risk of metastatic progression and worse survival outcomes. It allows for better prognostication and can significantly impact subsequent treatment decisions, particularly in patients where an aggressive surgical approach is being considered.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy. Surgical resection is the only curative modality combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival. Given the limitations of traditional responses such as cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRI) or tumor markers, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines included ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET as an adjunct to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are common misconceptions on the metabolic activity (tumor avidity) in PDAC so we aimed to describe the baseline characteristics and use of FDG-PET in a cohort of treatment-naive patients with PDAC. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study was conducted capturing all biopsy-proven, treatment-naive patients with PDAC who underwent either baseline FDG-PET/CT or FDG-PET/MRI imaging between 2008 and 2023. Baseline FDG-PET characteristics were collected, including primary tumors’ maximum standardized uptake value defined as metabolic activity (FDG uptake) of tumor compared with surrounding pancreatic parenchymal background, and the identification of extrapancreatic metastatic disease. RESULTS: We identified 1,095 treatment-naive patients with PDAC who underwent baseline FDG-PET imaging at diagnosis. CA19-9 was elevated in 76% of patients. Overall, 96.3% (1,054) of patients had FDG-avid tumors with a median maximum standardized uptake value of 6.4. FDG-PET also identified suspicious extrapancreatic metastatic lesions in 50% of patients, with a higher proportion (p < 0.001) in PET/MRI (59.9%) vs PET/CT (44.3%). After controlling for CA19-9 elevation, PET/MRI was superior in detection of extrapancreatic lesions compared with PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET has significant use in PDAC as a baseline imaging modality earlier neoadjuvant therapy given the majority of tumors are FDG-avid. FDG-PET can identify additional extrapancreatic suspicious lesions allowing for optimal initial staging, with PET/MRI having increased sensitivity over PET/CT.

Upamostat is an orally available small-molecule serine protease inhibitor that is a highly potent inhibitor of trypsin 1, trypsin 2, trypsin 3 (PRSS1/2/3), and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). These enzymes are expressed in many cancers, especially during tissue remodeling and subsequent tumor cell invasion. Opaganib (ABC294640), a novel, orally available small molecule is a selective inhibitor of the phosphorylation of sphingosine to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S-1-P) by sphingosine kinase 2 (SPHK2). Both sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) and SPHK2 are known to regulate the proliferation-inducing compound S-1-P. However, SPHK2 is more critical in cancer pathogenesis. The goal of this project was to investigate the potential antitumor effects of upamostat and opaganib, individually and in combination, on cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) xenografts in nude mice. PAX165, a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) from a surgically resected CCA, expresses substantial levels of SPHK2, PRSS1, PRSS2, and PRSS3. Four groups of 18 mice each were treated with upamostat, opaganib, both, or vehicle. Mouse weights and PAX165 tumor volumes were measured. Tumor volumes in the upamostat, opaganib, and upamostat plus opaganib groups were significantly decreased compared to the control group.