V. J. Wilson

The purpose of this review is to assess the role of short-latency pathways in the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR). First the current knowledge about the disynaptic and trisynaptic pathways linking semicircular canal and otolith afferents with cat neck motoneurons is summarized. We then discuss whether these pathways are sufficient or necessary to produce the responses observed in neck muscles by natural vestibular stimulation and conclude that they are neither. Finally, alternate pathways are considered, most likely involving reticulospinal fibers, which are an important part of the neural substrate of the VCR.

Our goal was to study potential substrates for cortical modulation of vestibular reflexes in the cat. In initial experiments, injections of wheat-germ-agglutinate-horseradish-peroxidase into Deiters’ nucleus and the rostral descending nucleus revealed bilateral colonies of retrogradely filled neurons in cortical areas 6, 2, and 3a (about 60 cells per colony). In cats anesthetized with chloralose-urethane, we stimulated areas 2 and 3a with trains of pulses while recording from ipsilateral vestibular-nucleus neurons, which were characterized by their responses to sinusoidal tilts and tested for the presence of antidromic responses to stimulation of the upper cervical cord. A majority of the neurons was affected by cortical stimulation, showing either facilitation, inhibition, or a mixture of the two. Stimulation in area 2 was more effective than stimulation in area 3a. Despite the anatomic presence of direct cortico-vestibular projections, properties of facilitation and inhibition suggest that both were evoked by polysynaptic pathways. Cortical effects were broadly distributed to vestibular neurons without regard to responses of these neurons to sinusoidal tilts. There was no significant difference between effects on lateral and medial vestibulospinal tract neurons, but, as a group, vestibulospinal neurons were much more likely to be affected by cortical stimulation than neurons not antidromically activated from the C2 segment. We conclude that, by their influence on vestibulospinal neurons, neurons in cortical areas 2 and 3a should be able to modulate, in behaving animals, vestibular reflexes acting on the neck and limbs.

1. To investigate the type of vestibular signals that neurons in the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei transmit to the cerebellum and spinal cord, we studied their responses to natural vestibular stimulation in vertical planes in decerebrate cats with the caudal cerebellum removed. Most neurons were in the caudal half of the descending vestibular nucleus, the remainder at corresponding levels of the medial nucleus or the medial-descending border. 2. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with sinusoidal tilts delivered at 0.05-1 Hz near the plane of body rotation that produced maximal modulation of the neuron's activity (response vector orientation). For most neurons the predominant vestibular input could be identified as coming from otolith organs (46%) or vertical semicircular canals (37%). Some neurons had otolith+canal convergence (9%) and others either had such converging input or some other form of central processing (8%). 3. Gain and phase of the responses of otolith neurons were comparable with values obtained in earlier studies on Deiters' nucleus and the rostral descending nucleus. Many canal neurons had a steeper gain slope and more advanced phase than observed previously for more rostral neurons. This may be due to more irregular afferent input to many neurons or to the absence of the vestibulocerebellum. 4. Response vector orientations of canal neurons were closely bunched near the planes of the ipsilateral vertical canals. The small number of contralaterally projecting vectors showed evidence of convergence between the two contralateral vertical canals. As is the case elsewhere in the vestibular nuclei, there was no evidence of convergence from bilateral vertical canals. Response vector orientations of otolith neurons were restricted to the roll quadrants; the majority pointed ipsilaterally. 5. Antidromic stimulation with an electrode in the restiform body or with several electrodes in the dorsal half of the white matter of the upper cervical cord was used to identify neurons projecting to the cerebellum and spinal cord, respectively. A substantial number of spontaneously firing neurons projected to the cerebellum, but there were few spontaneously active vestibulospinal neurons. The properties of the vestibular input to cerebellar-projecting neurons were the same as those of the population as a whole, but the effect of tilt on vestibulospinal neurons appeared weak or absent. 6. Many neurons were inhibited by stimulation of the restiform body. We suggest that this is mainly due to stimulation of the axons of vestibulocerebellar Purkinje cells. 7. Our results demonstrate a robust vertical vestibular input to the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Stabilization of the head is required not only for adequate motor performance, such as maintaining balance while standing or walking, but also for the adequate reception of sensory inputs such as visual and auditory information. The vestibular organs, which consist of three approximately orthogonal semicircular canals (anterior, horizontal, posterior) and two otolith organs (utriculus, sacculus), provide the most important input for the detection of head movement. Activation of afferents from these receptors evokes the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR), which stabilizes head position in space. In this review, which is the outgrowth of a session of the vestibular symposium held in Hawaii in April, 1994, we discuss the neural substrate of this reflex and some aspects of the central processing involved in its production. Some topics are not considered, in particular the important interaction between the VCR and the cervicocollic reflex evoked by activation of neck afferents (70,119), and attempts to model the reflex (69).