IAIngrid Van der Auwera

Ingrid Van der Auwera

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ingrid Van der Auwera has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Carl Spiessens

    Leuven University Fertility Center University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Christel Meuleman

    Leuven University Fertility Center University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Els Bakelants

    Leuven University Fertility Center University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Hilde Afschrift

    Leuven University Fertility Center University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Luc Meeuwis

    Leuven University Fertility Center University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven Belgium

    1 shared publication
  • Sophie Debrock

    Leuven University Fertility Center University Hospital Gasthuisberg Catholic University Leuven Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven Belgium

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer

    by Ingrid Van der Auwera, Sophie Debrock, Carl Spiessens, Hilde Afschrift, Els Bakelants, Christel Meuleman, Luc Meeuwis, Thomas M. D'HOoghe

    BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled study was performed in an unselected IVF/ICSI population to test the hypothesis that blastocyst transfers result in higher clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per oocyte retrieval when compared with day 2 transfers. METHODS: Blind randomization for transfer on day 2 (group 1) or day 5/6 (group 2) was performed before stimulation. Oocytes and embryos were cultured in sequential media in 5.5% CO2, 5% O2, 89.5% N2 and 90% humidity. A maximum of two embryos was transferred. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for age, IVF indication, number of treatment cycles, rate of ICSI/IVF, number of fertilized oocytes and number of embryos transferred. The CPR/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 1 (32%) and in group 2 (44%), while the CPR/embryo transfer was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in group 2 (60%) than in group 1 (35%). Similarly, the implantation rate per embryo transferred was significantly higher (P < 0.03) in group 2 (46%) than in group 1 (29%). The cryo-augmented delivery rate/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 2 (36.3%) and in group 1 (28.6%). CONCLUSION: This randomized study in an unselected population showed a significantly higher CPR/embryo transfer and a tendency toward a higher CPR/oocyte retrieval in patients receiving blastocysts when compared with day 2 transfers.