Edward R. Turner
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Edward R. Turner has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Arthur C. Huang
Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA 02139
1 shared publication - Choon S. Tan
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
1 shared publication - Edward M. Greitzer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gas Turbine Laboratory, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Cambridge, MA 02139
1 shared publication - Eugene F. Clemens
Turbine Aerodynamics, Rolls-Royce Corporation , Indianapolis, IN 46241
1 shared publication - Steven G. Gegg
Turbine Aerodynamics, Rolls-Royce Corporation , Indianapolis, IN 46241
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 26 June 2013
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Turbomachinery
- Vol. 135 (5) , 051012
Blade Loading Effects on Axial Turbine Tip Leakage Vortex Dynamics and Loss
Numerical simulations have been carried out to define the loss generation mechanisms associated with tip leakage in unshrouded axial turbines. Tip clearance vortex dynamics are a dominant feature of two mechanisms important in determining this loss: (i) decreased swirl velocity due to vortex line contraction in regions of decreasing axial velocity, i.e., adverse pressure gradient, and (ii) vortex breakdown and reverse flow in the vortex core. The mixing losses behave differently from the conventional view of flow exiting a turbine tip clearance. More specifically, it is shown through control volume arguments and computations that as a swirling leakage flow passes through a pressure rise, such as in the aft portion of the suction side of a turbine blade, the mixed-out loss can either decrease or increase. For turbines, the latter typically occurs if the deceleration is large enough to initiate vortex breakdown, and it is demonstrated that this can occur in modern turbines. The effect of blade pressure distribution on clearance losses is illustrated through computational examination of turbine blades with forward loading at the tip and with aft loading. A 15% difference in leakage loss is found between the two due to lower clearance vortex deceleration (lower core static pressure rise) with forward loading and, hence, lower vortex breakdown loss. Additional computational experiments, carried out to define the effects of blade loading, incidence, and solidity, are found to be consistent with the proposed ideas linking blade pressure distribution, vortex breakdown, and turbine tip leakage loss.
- 26 June 2013
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Turbomachinery
- Vol. 135 (5) , 051012
Blade Loading Effects on Axial Turbine Tip Leakage Vortex Dynamics and Loss
Numerical simulations have been carried out to define the loss generation mechanisms associated with tip leakage in unshrouded axial turbines. Tip clearance vortex dynamics are a dominant feature of two mechanisms important in determining this loss: (i) decreased swirl velocity due to vortex line contraction in regions of decreasing axial velocity, i.e., adverse pressure gradient, and (ii) vortex breakdown and reverse flow in the vortex core. The mixing losses behave differently from the conventional view of flow exiting a turbine tip clearance. More specifically, it is shown through control volume arguments and computations that as a swirling leakage flow passes through a pressure rise, such as in the aft portion of the suction side of a turbine blade, the mixed-out loss can either decrease or increase. For turbines, the latter typically occurs if the deceleration is large enough to initiate vortex breakdown, and it is demonstrated that this can occur in modern turbines. The effect of blade pressure distribution on clearance losses is illustrated through computational examination of turbine blades with forward loading at the tip and with aft loading. A 15% difference in leakage loss is found between the two due to lower clearance vortex deceleration (lower core static pressure rise) with forward loading and, hence, lower vortex breakdown loss. Additional computational experiments, carried out to define the effects of blade loading, incidence, and solidity, are found to be consistent with the proposed ideas linking blade pressure distribution, vortex breakdown, and turbine tip leakage loss.