Edvard Hauff
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Edvard Hauff has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ingrid Melle
2 shared publicationsPer Vaglum
The University of Oslo, Psychiatric Department B, Ullevål University Hospital, and Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2 shared publications- Svein Friis
Oslo University Hospital
2 shared publications Per Vaglum
1 shared publication- Per Vaglum
Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
1 shared publication Petter Laake
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2002
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 53 (4) , 471-473
Inpatient Psychotherapy Compared With Usual Care for Patients Who Have Schizophrenic Psychoses
- 1 April 2002
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 53 (4) , 471-473
Inpatient Psychotherapy Compared With Usual Care for Patients Who Have Schizophrenic Psychoses
- 1 February 2000
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 51 (2) , 223-228
Social Functioning of Patients With Schizophrenia in High-Income Welfare Societies
- 1 February 2000
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 51 (2) , 223-228
Social Functioning of Patients With Schizophrenia in High-Income Welfare Societies
- 1 January 1999
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 95-100
Transcultural Perspectives of the Management of Mental Health Care
- 1 January 1999
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 95-100
Transcultural Perspectives of the Management of Mental Health Care
- 1 January 1995
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 49 (1) , 5-10
The Ullevål acute-ward follow-up study: Reflections on the treatment of psychotic patients who committed suicide
Of all patients with functional psychosis from one catchment area treated in an acute ward in Oslo, eight patients (9%) committed suicide during the following 8 years, six men and two women, with an age range of 18–70 years. Four had affective psychoses, three schizophrenia, and one atypical psychosis. Five problematic issues in the treatment of these patients have been identified: 1) poor therapeutic alliance, 2) countertransference problems, 3) problems with drug compliance, 4) discrepancy between treatment ideology and patient needs, and 5) disputes between treatment units over treatment responsibility. The clinical problems are illustrated by three case stories. These patients need continuity of care, but the establishment of long-term aftercare is complicated by psychopathology, lack of therapist capacity, and controversies between units about treatment responsibility. Countertransference problems are common, and wards should develop clinical milieus that offer openness for personal reactions and available supervisors. The authors suggest that the political resolution to give priority to acute psychiatry and the ongoing sectorization, at least in the observation period (1980–88), may have affected the treatment of these patients negatively. A major problem was lack of an effective, suprasectorial administration that could settle disputes between the different units.
- 1 January 1995
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 49 (1) , 5-10
The Ullevål acute-ward follow-up study: Reflections on the treatment of psychotic patients who committed suicide
Of all patients with functional psychosis from one catchment area treated in an acute ward in Oslo, eight patients (9%) committed suicide during the following 8 years, six men and two women, with an age range of 18–70 years. Four had affective psychoses, three schizophrenia, and one atypical psychosis. Five problematic issues in the treatment of these patients have been identified: 1) poor therapeutic alliance, 2) countertransference problems, 3) problems with drug compliance, 4) discrepancy between treatment ideology and patient needs, and 5) disputes between treatment units over treatment responsibility. The clinical problems are illustrated by three case stories. These patients need continuity of care, but the establishment of long-term aftercare is complicated by psychopathology, lack of therapist capacity, and controversies between units about treatment responsibility. Countertransference problems are common, and wards should develop clinical milieus that offer openness for personal reactions and available supervisors. The authors suggest that the political resolution to give priority to acute psychiatry and the ongoing sectorization, at least in the observation period (1980–88), may have affected the treatment of these patients negatively. A major problem was lack of an effective, suprasectorial administration that could settle disputes between the different units.
- 1 January 1993
- Published by JSTOR
- Vol. 27 (2) , 388
Integration of Vietnamese Refugees into the Norwegian Labor Market: The Impact of War Trauma
- 1 January 1993
- Published by JSTOR
- Vol. 27 (2) , 388
Integration of Vietnamese Refugees into the Norwegian Labor Market: The Impact of War Trauma