Claudia Hauff
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Claudia Hauff has a total of 114 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Gustavo Penha
TU Delft
7 shared publications - Mounia Lalmas
Spotify, London, United Kingdom
5 shared publications - Arthur Câmara
Delft University of Technology
3 shared publications - Ben Carterette
Spotify, New York, USA
3 shared publications - Charles L. A. Clarke
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
3 shared publications - David Maxwell
University of Cambridge
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 November 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 9458-9460
Supporting Human Memory with Audiobook Recaps: From Quality Discovery to Automatic Prompt Optimization
- 6 November 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 9458-9460
Open AccessSupporting Human Memory with Audiobook Recaps: From Quality Discovery to Automatic Prompt Optimization
- Open Access
- 19 July 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4938-4943
As It Was: Aligning LLM Search Evaluation with Historical User Preferences
- 19 July 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4938-4943
Open AccessAs It Was: Aligning LLM Search Evaluation with Historical User Preferences
- 24 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 177-183
The Third Search Futures Workshop at ECIR’26
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 3-15
Adaptive Repetition for Mitigating Position Bias in LLM-Based Ranking
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 3-15
Adaptive Repetition for Mitigating Position Bias in LLM-Based Ranking
- Open Access
- 18 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 78-91
Preaching to the ChoIR: Lessons IR Should Share with AI
- 18 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 78-91
Open AccessPreaching to the ChoIR: Lessons IR Should Share with AI
- Open Access
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2276-2286
Zero-Shot Reranking with Large Language Models and Precomputed Ranking Features: Opportunities and Limitations
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2276-2286
Open AccessZero-Shot Reranking with Large Language Models and Precomputed Ranking Features: Opportunities and Limitations
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 23 June 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 840-854
Policy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
- 23 June 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 840-854
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessPolicy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
- Open Access
- 21 October 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4487-4495
PODTILE: Facilitating Podcast Episode Browsing with Auto-generated Chapters
Listeners of long-form talk-audio content, such as podcast episodes, often find it challenging to understand the overall structure and locate relevant sections. A practical solution is to divide episodes into chapters'semantically coherent segments labeled with titles and timestamps. Since most episodes on our platform at Spotify currently lack creator-provided chapters, automating the creation of chapters is essential. Scaling the chapterization of podcast episodes presents unique challenges. First, episodes tend to be less structured than written texts, featuring spontaneous discussions with nuanced transitions. Second, the transcripts are usually lengthy, averaging about 16,000 tokens, which necessitates efficient processing that can preserve context. To address these challenges, we introduce PODTILE, a fine-tuned encoder-decoder transformer to segment conversational data. The model simultaneously generates chapter transitions and titles for the input transcript. To preserve context, each input text is augmented with global context, including the episode's title, description, and previous chapter titles. In our intrinsic evaluation, PODTILE achieved a 11% improvement in ROUGE score over the strongest previous baseline. Additionally, we provide insights into the practical benefits of auto-generated chapters for listeners navigating episode content. Our findings indicate that auto-generated chapters serve as a useful tool for engaging with less popular podcasts. Finally, we present empirical evidence that using chapter titles can enhance the effectiveness of sparse retrieval in search tasks.
- 21 October 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4487-4495
Open AccessPODTILE: Facilitating Podcast Episode Browsing with Auto-generated Chapters
Listeners of long-form talk-audio content, such as podcast episodes, often find it challenging to understand the overall structure and locate relevant sections. A practical solution is to divide episodes into chapters'semantically coherent segments labeled with titles and timestamps. Since most episodes on our platform at Spotify currently lack creator-provided chapters, automating the creation of chapters is essential. Scaling the chapterization of podcast episodes presents unique challenges. First, episodes tend to be less structured than written texts, featuring spontaneous discussions with nuanced transitions. Second, the transcripts are usually lengthy, averaging about 16,000 tokens, which necessitates efficient processing that can preserve context. To address these challenges, we introduce PODTILE, a fine-tuned encoder-decoder transformer to segment conversational data. The model simultaneously generates chapter transitions and titles for the input transcript. To preserve context, each input text is augmented with global context, including the episode's title, description, and previous chapter titles. In our intrinsic evaluation, PODTILE achieved a 11% improvement in ROUGE score over the strongest previous baseline. Additionally, we provide insights into the practical benefits of auto-generated chapters for listeners navigating episode content. Our findings indicate that auto-generated chapters serve as a useful tool for engaging with less popular podcasts. Finally, we present empirical evidence that using chapter titles can enhance the effectiveness of sparse retrieval in search tasks.
- Open Access
- 10 March 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 266-277
On the Effects of Automatically Generated Adjunct Questions for Search as Learning
Actively engaging learners with learning materials has been shown to be very important in the Search as Learning (SAL) setting. One active reading strategy relies on asking so-called adjunct questions, i.e., manually curated questions geared towards essential concepts of the target material. However, manual question creation is impractical given the vast online content. Recent research has explored the effects of Automatic Question Generation (AQG) on aiding human learning. These studies have primarily focused on user studies in controlled online reading scenarios with limited documents. However, the impacts of adjunct questions on learning in the SAL setting, which involves learning through web searching, are not yet well understood. This paper addresses this gap by conducting a user study with automatically generated adjunct questions integrated into the reading interface built on top of a search system. We conducted a between-subjects user study (N = 144) to investigate the incorporation of automatically generated adjunct questions on participants’ learning. We employed three different question generation strategies as well as a control condition: (i) synthesis questions; (ii) factoid questions targeting random text spans; and (iii) factoid questions targeting terms and phrases relevant to the information need at hand. We present four major findings: (i) participants who received adjunct questions exhibited significantly more fine-grained reading behaviour, such as longer document dwell time and more scrolls, than those without adjunct questions. However, adjunct questions’ influence on learning outcomes depends on the AQG strategy. (ii) Question types significantly influence participants’ reading behaviour. (iii) The adjunct questions’ target spans significantly influence learning outcomes. Lastly, (iv) participants’ prior knowledge levels affect adjunct questions’ effects on their learning outcomes and their reaction to different AQG strategies. Our findings have significant design implications for learning-oriented search systems. The data and code is available at https://github.com/zpeide/AQG-AdjunctQuestions.
- 10 March 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 266-277
Open AccessOn the Effects of Automatically Generated Adjunct Questions for Search as Learning
Actively engaging learners with learning materials has been shown to be very important in the Search as Learning (SAL) setting. One active reading strategy relies on asking so-called adjunct questions, i.e., manually curated questions geared towards essential concepts of the target material. However, manual question creation is impractical given the vast online content. Recent research has explored the effects of Automatic Question Generation (AQG) on aiding human learning. These studies have primarily focused on user studies in controlled online reading scenarios with limited documents. However, the impacts of adjunct questions on learning in the SAL setting, which involves learning through web searching, are not yet well understood. This paper addresses this gap by conducting a user study with automatically generated adjunct questions integrated into the reading interface built on top of a search system. We conducted a between-subjects user study (N = 144) to investigate the incorporation of automatically generated adjunct questions on participants’ learning. We employed three different question generation strategies as well as a control condition: (i) synthesis questions; (ii) factoid questions targeting random text spans; and (iii) factoid questions targeting terms and phrases relevant to the information need at hand. We present four major findings: (i) participants who received adjunct questions exhibited significantly more fine-grained reading behaviour, such as longer document dwell time and more scrolls, than those without adjunct questions. However, adjunct questions’ influence on learning outcomes depends on the AQG strategy. (ii) Question types significantly influence participants’ reading behaviour. (iii) The adjunct questions’ target spans significantly influence learning outcomes. Lastly, (iv) participants’ prior knowledge levels affect adjunct questions’ effects on their learning outcomes and their reaction to different AQG strategies. Our findings have significant design implications for learning-oriented search systems. The data and code is available at https://github.com/zpeide/AQG-AdjunctQuestions.
- Open Access
- 21 October 2023
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4780-4786
Graph Learning for Exploratory Query Suggestions in an Instant Search System
- 21 October 2023
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4780-4786
Open AccessGraph Learning for Exploratory Query Suggestions in an Instant Search System