Abhishek Trehan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Abhishek Trehan has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ashton Barnett-Vanes
Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 shared publications - Mahiben Maruthappu
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
3 shared publications Peter McCulloch
2 shared publications- Peter McCulloch
Nuffield Department of Surgical Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 shared publications A. K. Trehan
Elland Hospital, Elland, West Yorkshire, UK
1 shared publicationAshwini K Trehan
British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) Endometriosis Centre, Spire Elland Hospital,Elland, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
The impact of feedback of intraoperative technical performance in surgery: a systematic review
Objectives Increasing patient demands, costs and emphasis on safety, coupled with reductions in the length of time surgical trainees spend in the operating theatre, necessitate means to improve the efficiency of surgical training. In this respect, feedback based on intraoperative surgical performance may be beneficial. Our aim was to systematically review the impact of intraoperative feedback based on surgical performance. Setting MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 32 data-points per study were extracted. Participants The search strategy yielded 1531 citations. Three studies were eligible, which comprised a total of 280 procedures by 62 surgeons. Results Overall, feedback based on intraoperative surgical performance was found to be a powerful method for improving performance. In cholecystectomy, feedback led to a reduction in procedure time (p=0.022) and an improvement in economy of movement (pConclusions Intraoperative feedback appears to be associated with an improvement in performance, however, there is a paucity of research in this area. Further work is needed in order to establish the long-term benefits of feedback and the optimum means and circumstances of feedback delivery.
Open AccessThe impact of feedback of intraoperative technical performance in surgery: a systematic review
Objectives Increasing patient demands, costs and emphasis on safety, coupled with reductions in the length of time surgical trainees spend in the operating theatre, necessitate means to improve the efficiency of surgical training. In this respect, feedback based on intraoperative surgical performance may be beneficial. Our aim was to systematically review the impact of intraoperative feedback based on surgical performance. Setting MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 32 data-points per study were extracted. Participants The search strategy yielded 1531 citations. Three studies were eligible, which comprised a total of 280 procedures by 62 surgeons. Results Overall, feedback based on intraoperative surgical performance was found to be a powerful method for improving performance. In cholecystectomy, feedback led to a reduction in procedure time (p=0.022) and an improvement in economy of movement (pConclusions Intraoperative feedback appears to be associated with an improvement in performance, however, there is a paucity of research in this area. Further work is needed in order to establish the long-term benefits of feedback and the optimum means and circumstances of feedback delivery.
- 2 December 2014
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 39 (4) , 879-889
The Impact of Feedback of Surgical Outcome Data on Surgical Performance: A Systematic Review
Background: Increasing patient demands, costs and emphasis on safety have led to performance tracking of individual surgeons. Several methods of using these data, including feedback have been proposed. Our aim was to systematically review the impact of feedback of outcome data to surgeons on their performance.Study design: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (from their inception to February 2013) were searched. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty two data‐points per study were extracted.Results: The search strategy yielded 1,531 citations. Seven studies were eligible comprising 18,632 cases or procedures by 52 surgeons. Overall, feedback was found to be a powerful method for improving surgical outcomes or indicators of surgical performance, including reductions in hospital mortality after CABG of 24 % (P = 0.001), decreases of stroke and mortality following carotid endarterectomy from 5.2 to 2.3 %, improved ovarian cancer resection from 77 to 85 % (P = 0.157) and reductions in wound infection rates from 14 to 10.3 %. Improvements in performance occurred in concert with reduced costs: for hepaticojejunostomy, implementation of feedback was associated with a decrease in overall hospital costs from $24,446 to $20,240 (P < 0.01). Similarly, total cost of carotid endarterectomy and following management decreased from $13,344 to $9548.Conclusions: The available literature suggests that feedback can improve surgical performance and outcomes; however, given the heterogeneity and limited number of studies, in addition to their non‐randomised nature, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions from the literature with regard to the efficacy of feedback and the specific nuances required to optimise the impact of feedback. There is a clear need for more rigorous studies to determine how feedback of outcome data may impact performance, and whether this low‐cost intervention has potential to benefit surgical practice.
- 2 December 2014
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 39 (4) , 879-889
The Impact of Feedback of Surgical Outcome Data on Surgical Performance: A Systematic Review
Background: Increasing patient demands, costs and emphasis on safety have led to performance tracking of individual surgeons. Several methods of using these data, including feedback have been proposed. Our aim was to systematically review the impact of feedback of outcome data to surgeons on their performance.Study design: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (from their inception to February 2013) were searched. Two reviewers independently reviewed citations using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty two data‐points per study were extracted.Results: The search strategy yielded 1,531 citations. Seven studies were eligible comprising 18,632 cases or procedures by 52 surgeons. Overall, feedback was found to be a powerful method for improving surgical outcomes or indicators of surgical performance, including reductions in hospital mortality after CABG of 24 % (P = 0.001), decreases of stroke and mortality following carotid endarterectomy from 5.2 to 2.3 %, improved ovarian cancer resection from 77 to 85 % (P = 0.157) and reductions in wound infection rates from 14 to 10.3 %. Improvements in performance occurred in concert with reduced costs: for hepaticojejunostomy, implementation of feedback was associated with a decrease in overall hospital costs from $24,446 to $20,240 (P < 0.01). Similarly, total cost of carotid endarterectomy and following management decreased from $13,344 to $9548.Conclusions: The available literature suggests that feedback can improve surgical performance and outcomes; however, given the heterogeneity and limited number of studies, in addition to their non‐randomised nature, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions from the literature with regard to the efficacy of feedback and the specific nuances required to optimise the impact of feedback. There is a clear need for more rigorous studies to determine how feedback of outcome data may impact performance, and whether this low‐cost intervention has potential to benefit surgical practice.
- 1 November 2014
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 12, S73-S74
The impact of feedback on surgical performance: A systematic review
- 1 November 2014
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 12, S73-S74
The impact of feedback on surgical performance: A systematic review
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 219 (4) , e148
Does feedback of surgical outcome data improve surgical performance? A systematic review
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 219 (4) , e148
Does feedback of surgical outcome data improve surgical performance? A systematic review
- Open Access
- 2 July 2014
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 93 (2) , 125-134
Comparison of Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy and On-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: To compare peri- and postoperative variables, surgical complications, oncological outcomes and renal outcomes of off-clamp partial nephrectomy (PN) and on-clamp PN. Methods: A systematic search of the electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library, was performed. The pooled estimates of tumour size, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, transfusion rates, urinary leaks, positive surgical margins and eGFR were calculated. Results: 14 studies were included. There was no significant difference between off-clamp PN and on-clamp PN in terms of tumour size, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, transfusion rates, urinary leaks, and positive surgical margins. However, a non-statistically significant trend towards increased blood loss (p = 0.12) and transfusion rates (p = 0.07) in those undergoing off-clamp PN was noted. Off-clamp PN was associated with a significantly lower reduction in eGFR than on-clamp PN (standardised weighted mean difference 0.27, 95% CI 0.14, 0.40, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Off-clamp PN may be associated with improved long-term renal outcomes when compared to on-clamp PN with no difference in in peri- and postoperative variables, surgical complications and oncological outcomes. However, the meta-analysis was limited by the design of the underlying studies, and hence further work is necessary.
- 2 July 2014
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 93 (2) , 125-134
Open AccessComparison of Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy and On-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: To compare peri- and postoperative variables, surgical complications, oncological outcomes and renal outcomes of off-clamp partial nephrectomy (PN) and on-clamp PN. Methods: A systematic search of the electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library, was performed. The pooled estimates of tumour size, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, transfusion rates, urinary leaks, positive surgical margins and eGFR were calculated. Results: 14 studies were included. There was no significant difference between off-clamp PN and on-clamp PN in terms of tumour size, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, transfusion rates, urinary leaks, and positive surgical margins. However, a non-statistically significant trend towards increased blood loss (p = 0.12) and transfusion rates (p = 0.07) in those undergoing off-clamp PN was noted. Off-clamp PN was associated with a significantly lower reduction in eGFR than on-clamp PN (standardised weighted mean difference 0.27, 95% CI 0.14, 0.40, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Off-clamp PN may be associated with improved long-term renal outcomes when compared to on-clamp PN with no difference in in peri- and postoperative variables, surgical complications and oncological outcomes. However, the meta-analysis was limited by the design of the underlying studies, and hence further work is necessary.
- 7 June 2014
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction
- Vol. 29 (8) , 1831-1832
Ovarian suspension for longer than 36 h is necessary for temporary ovarian suspension to fulfil its remit
- 7 June 2014
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction
- Vol. 29 (8) , 1831-1832
Ovarian suspension for longer than 36 h is necessary for temporary ovarian suspension to fulfil its remit
- Open Access
- 21 May 2014
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Case Reports
- Vol. 2014
Endometrioma contained within the broad ligament
We present a rare case of an endometrioma present within and firmly adherent to the broad ligament in a patient who experienced an episode of acute abdominal pain. The endometrioma was excised laparoscopically and the broad ligament repaired.
- 21 May 2014
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Case Reports
- Vol. 2014
Open AccessEndometrioma contained within the broad ligament
We present a rare case of an endometrioma present within and firmly adherent to the broad ligament in a patient who experienced an episode of acute abdominal pain. The endometrioma was excised laparoscopically and the broad ligament repaired.
- 20 December 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 112-113
Peritoneal inclusion cyst with an unusual presentation treated by laparoscopic peritonectomy
(2014). Peritoneal inclusion cyst with an unusual presentation treated by laparoscopic peritonectomy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 112-113.
- 20 December 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 112-113
Peritoneal inclusion cyst with an unusual presentation treated by laparoscopic peritonectomy
(2014). Peritoneal inclusion cyst with an unusual presentation treated by laparoscopic peritonectomy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 112-113.