Makoto Ehara
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Makoto Ehara has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kimihiko Hyakumura
Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
5 shared publications Heng Sokh
2 shared publications- Saykham Boutthavong
National University of Laos (NUOL), Laos
2 shared publications - Aikawa Takanobu
Forester Gathering Tokyo Japan
1 shared publication - Akira S. Mori
Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
1 shared publication Chivin Leng
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 March 2025
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Ecology
- Vol. 62 (4) , 753-760
Assessing the priorities of stakeholders regarding forest ecosystem services in Japan
The urgency to conserve and restore forests for their multifaceted benefits is escalating. We spotlight Japan's new Forest Environment Tax, a novel fiscal measure crafted to finance public‐beneficial ecosystem services through enhanced forest management. To convey the expert perceptions of the policy, we present the results of a survey targeting individuals immersed in Japan's forest policies, which aimed to assess attitudes toward the various benefits that forests provide. We classified forest functions into five core areas: wood production, soil and water conservation, mitigation of anthropogenic global warming, wildlife conservation and cultural utilities. We found that stakeholders closely involved in forest policies in Japan prioritize soil and water conservation as the paramount function over the mitigation of anthropogenic global warming. The results of the survey underscore the necessity of evaluating forest management practices and the importance of recognizing the multiple values that can be derived from forests. While there has been much attention to the carbon benefits of forests in the region and beyond, we emphasize the need to avoid an excessive focus on this single ecosystem service and to ensure that the other important multifunctional values of forests are not overlooked. Policy implications: We call for a more holistic approach that recognises the interdependence of the different functions of forests and the importance of valuing forests as natural capital in all their dimensions.
- 5 March 2025
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Ecology
- Vol. 62 (4) , 753-760
Open AccessAssessing the priorities of stakeholders regarding forest ecosystem services in Japan
The urgency to conserve and restore forests for their multifaceted benefits is escalating. We spotlight Japan's new Forest Environment Tax, a novel fiscal measure crafted to finance public‐beneficial ecosystem services through enhanced forest management. To convey the expert perceptions of the policy, we present the results of a survey targeting individuals immersed in Japan's forest policies, which aimed to assess attitudes toward the various benefits that forests provide. We classified forest functions into five core areas: wood production, soil and water conservation, mitigation of anthropogenic global warming, wildlife conservation and cultural utilities. We found that stakeholders closely involved in forest policies in Japan prioritize soil and water conservation as the paramount function over the mitigation of anthropogenic global warming. The results of the survey underscore the necessity of evaluating forest management practices and the importance of recognizing the multiple values that can be derived from forests. While there has been much attention to the carbon benefits of forests in the region and beyond, we emphasize the need to avoid an excessive focus on this single ecosystem service and to ensure that the other important multifunctional values of forests are not overlooked. Policy implications: We call for a more holistic approach that recognises the interdependence of the different functions of forests and the importance of valuing forests as natural capital in all their dimensions.
- Open Access
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Forest Policy and Economics
- Vol. 106, 101945
REDD+ engagement types preferred by Japanese private firms: The challenges and opportunities in relation to private sector participation
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Forest Policy and Economics
- Vol. 106, 101945
Open AccessREDD+ engagement types preferred by Japanese private firms: The challenges and opportunities in relation to private sector participation
- Open Access
- 1 July 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Economics
- Vol. 149, 226-238
Addressing Maladaptive Coping Strategies of Local Communities to Changes in Ecosystem Service Provisions Using the DPSIR Framework
- 1 July 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Economics
- Vol. 149, 226-238
Open AccessAddressing Maladaptive Coping Strategies of Local Communities to Changes in Ecosystem Service Provisions Using the DPSIR Framework
- Open Access
Stakeholder Participation in REDD+ Readiness Activities for Three Collaborative Projects in Lao PDR
A key challenge for reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in developing countries is to balance the power of various stakeholders in decision making. This study explores the forms of stakeholder participation in the implementation of three pilot projects in Laos, with a focus on who actually makes decisions on project activities. We found that stakeholder roles in making decisions were imbalanced. The central government and development partner organizations were the ones who actually fulfill the roles of decision-makers in most project activities. Although local communities were not the key stakeholders in decision making in most activities, their roles seem to have increased in the activities where participatory approaches were applied. Participation of the private sector, non-governmental organizations, academic and research institutes and mass organizations was limited. Opportunities to reach decision-makers regarding project activities came through service contract agreements. Our findings suggest that an understanding of who fulfills the key roles will support a decentralization of decision making by balancing power and redistributing the roles from dominant to weaker stakeholders. In addition, the private sector’s participation may enhance opportunities to harmonize their investments for supporting REDD+ development and reduce the negative impacts on the forests and the environment.
Open AccessStakeholder Participation in REDD+ Readiness Activities for Three Collaborative Projects in Lao PDR
A key challenge for reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in developing countries is to balance the power of various stakeholders in decision making. This study explores the forms of stakeholder participation in the implementation of three pilot projects in Laos, with a focus on who actually makes decisions on project activities. We found that stakeholder roles in making decisions were imbalanced. The central government and development partner organizations were the ones who actually fulfill the roles of decision-makers in most project activities. Although local communities were not the key stakeholders in decision making in most activities, their roles seem to have increased in the activities where participatory approaches were applied. Participation of the private sector, non-governmental organizations, academic and research institutes and mass organizations was limited. Opportunities to reach decision-makers regarding project activities came through service contract agreements. Our findings suggest that an understanding of who fulfills the key roles will support a decentralization of decision making by balancing power and redistributing the roles from dominant to weaker stakeholders. In addition, the private sector’s participation may enhance opportunities to harmonize their investments for supporting REDD+ development and reduce the negative impacts on the forests and the environment.
- Open Access
Historical Changes of Land Tenure and Land Use Rights in a Local Community: A Case Study in Lao PDR
Land-titling programs, land and forest allocation programs, and projects on state-allocated land for development and investment in Laos have been key drivers of change in land tenure. These have triggered major shifts in land use rights, from customary, to temporary, and then to permanent land use rights. This article explores how government programs to grant land use rights to individual households have affected the way people have been able to acquire and secure land tenure. For our case study, we selected the village of Napo, the target of many land tenure changes in the past four decades. We collected data from district offices, group discussions with village organizations, and interviews with selected households. The study shows how land use rights shifted over time and reveals that households obtained most of their agricultural land and forestland through a claim process. Original households were mainly land claimers, while migrants were land buyers. The process of formalization and allocation of tenure triggered inequality among households. Attention is needed in future land governance and tenure reforms in order to safeguard the land use rights of local people in an equitable manner.
Open AccessHistorical Changes of Land Tenure and Land Use Rights in a Local Community: A Case Study in Lao PDR
Land-titling programs, land and forest allocation programs, and projects on state-allocated land for development and investment in Laos have been key drivers of change in land tenure. These have triggered major shifts in land use rights, from customary, to temporary, and then to permanent land use rights. This article explores how government programs to grant land use rights to individual households have affected the way people have been able to acquire and secure land tenure. For our case study, we selected the village of Napo, the target of many land tenure changes in the past four decades. We collected data from district offices, group discussions with village organizations, and interviews with selected households. The study shows how land use rights shifted over time and reveals that households obtained most of their agricultural land and forestland through a claim process. Original households were mainly land claimers, while migrants were land buyers. The process of formalization and allocation of tenure triggered inequality among households. Attention is needed in future land governance and tenure reforms in order to safeguard the land use rights of local people in an equitable manner.
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Forest Research
- Vol. 19 (5) , 427-436
REDD+ initiatives for safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services: harmonizing sets of standards for national application
In the context of growing concerns about environmental aspects of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (acronym REDD+), we conducted a comparative an...
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Forest Research
- Vol. 19 (5) , 427-436
REDD+ initiatives for safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services: harmonizing sets of standards for national application
In the context of growing concerns about environmental aspects of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (acronym REDD+), we conducted a comparative an...
- 1 January 2014
- Published by The Japanese Forest Society in Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
- Vol. 96 (5) , 290-291
Keynote (2): Why Forests? Why Now? Conserving Tropical Forests for Climate and Development
- 1 January 2014
- Published by The Japanese Forest Society in Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
- Vol. 96 (5) , 290-291
Keynote (2): Why Forests? Why Now? Conserving Tropical Forests for Climate and Development