Judith L. Reese
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Judith L. Reese has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Harvey B. Abrams
VA Medical Center, Bay Pines, Florida 33744, and the Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida, USA
1 shared publication - Rachel McArdle
Theresa Hnath Chisolm, PhD, is Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication Disorders at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, and Research Audiologist at Bay Pines (FL) VA Healthcare System
1 shared publication Sandra L. Schneider
1 shared publication- Sherri L. Smith
Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
1 shared publication - Theresa E. Hnath-Chisolm
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA
1 shared publication - Theresa Hnath Chisolm
Theresa Hnath Chisolm, PhD, is Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication Disorders at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, and Research Audiologist at Bay Pines (FL) VA Healthcare System
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 November 2007
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Hearing Journal
- Vol. 60 (11) , 37-44
Connecting the hearing-impaired in a wireless world
- 1 November 2007
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Hearing Journal
- Vol. 60 (11) , 37-44
Connecting the hearing-impaired in a wireless world
- 1 June 2005
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in American Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 14 (1) , 94-104
Recognition of Hearing Aid Orientation Content by First-Time Users
Purpose: To examine how well hearing aid orientation (HAO) content is remembered immediately and 1 month after the HAO, and whether the ability to remember this information differs as a function of the audiologist providing the information, patient’s age, degree of hearing loss, and prior knowledge of hearing aids. Method: A convenience sample of 100 older adults completed a multiple-choice test of hearing aid knowledge immediately following the HAO and 1 month later. Covariate and regression analyses were used to address the study purpose. Results: On average, participants recognized 74% of the information immediately following HAO and 78% at 1 month. Hearing loss was associated with declining recognition for hearing aid use and care information immediately following HAO, whereas prior knowledge was associated with successful recognition. Participants who recognized more HAO content immediately also remembered more at 1 month. A difference in recognition of hearing aid information based on audiologist was suggested immediately following HAO, but there were no differences at 1 month. Ability to recognize HAO content was not related to age of participants. Conclusions: On average, participants recognized approximately 75% of the HAO content, which is encouraging from a clinical standpoint, providing support for the efficacy of the HAO and the time audiologists spend in completing it. Moreover, recognition of HAO content improved when tested at 1 month, suggesting audiologists may expect their patients to be aware of a majority of hearing aid use and care information following the hearing aid trial period.
- 1 June 2005
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in American Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 14 (1) , 94-104
Recognition of Hearing Aid Orientation Content by First-Time Users
Purpose: To examine how well hearing aid orientation (HAO) content is remembered immediately and 1 month after the HAO, and whether the ability to remember this information differs as a function of the audiologist providing the information, patient’s age, degree of hearing loss, and prior knowledge of hearing aids. Method: A convenience sample of 100 older adults completed a multiple-choice test of hearing aid knowledge immediately following the HAO and 1 month later. Covariate and regression analyses were used to address the study purpose. Results: On average, participants recognized 74% of the information immediately following HAO and 78% at 1 month. Hearing loss was associated with declining recognition for hearing aid use and care information immediately following HAO, whereas prior knowledge was associated with successful recognition. Participants who recognized more HAO content immediately also remembered more at 1 month. A difference in recognition of hearing aid information based on audiologist was suggested immediately following HAO, but there were no differences at 1 month. Ability to recognize HAO content was not related to age of participants. Conclusions: On average, participants recognized approximately 75% of the HAO content, which is encouraging from a clinical standpoint, providing support for the efficacy of the HAO and the time audiologists spend in completing it. Moreover, recognition of HAO content improved when tested at 1 month, suggesting audiologists may expect their patients to be aware of a majority of hearing aid use and care information following the hearing aid trial period.