A.P.M. (Suzanne) Giesbers
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
A.P.M. (Suzanne) Giesbers has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Roel Schouteten
Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
2 shared publications Beatrice I.J.M. van der Heijden
Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Management Research, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
1 shared publication- Beatrice Van der Heijden
Radboud University
1 shared publication Erik Poutsma
Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Management Research, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
1 shared publication- Erik Poutsma
Radboud University, Institute for Management Research, PO Box 9108, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, the Netherlands
1 shared publication Theo van Achterberg
Radboud University Medical Centre, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2016
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Vol. 64, 120-129
Nurses’ perceptions of feedback to nursing teams on quality measurements: An embedded case study design
- 1 December 2016
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Vol. 64, 120-129
Nurses’ perceptions of feedback to nursing teams on quality measurements: An embedded case study design
- 30 December 2013
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Journal of Nursing Management
- Vol. 23 (5) , 682-691
Feedback provision, nurses’ well-being and quality improvement: towards a conceptual framework
This contribution develops a conceptual framework that illustrates how feedback on quality measurements to nursing teams can be related to nurses' well-being and quality improvement. It is assumed that providing nursing teams with feedback on quality measurements will lead to quality improvement. Research does not fully support this assumption. Additionally, previous empirical work shows that feedback on quality measurements may have alienating and demotivating effects on nurses. This article uniquely integrates scholarly literature on feedback provision and strategic human resource management. The relationship between feedback provision, nurses' well-being and quality improvement remains unclear from research until now. Three perspectives are discussed that illustrate that feedback provision can result in quality improvement at the expense of or for the benefit of nurses' well-being. To better understand these contradictory effects, research should examine nurses' perceptions of feedback as mediating variables, while incorporating context factors as moderating variables. Nursing management can use feedback on quality measurements to nursing teams, as a tool for enhanced quality and as a motivating tool. However, nurses' perceptions and contextual variables are important for the actual success of feedback.
- 30 December 2013
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Journal of Nursing Management
- Vol. 23 (5) , 682-691
Feedback provision, nurses’ well-being and quality improvement: towards a conceptual framework
This contribution develops a conceptual framework that illustrates how feedback on quality measurements to nursing teams can be related to nurses' well-being and quality improvement. It is assumed that providing nursing teams with feedback on quality measurements will lead to quality improvement. Research does not fully support this assumption. Additionally, previous empirical work shows that feedback on quality measurements may have alienating and demotivating effects on nurses. This article uniquely integrates scholarly literature on feedback provision and strategic human resource management. The relationship between feedback provision, nurses' well-being and quality improvement remains unclear from research until now. Three perspectives are discussed that illustrate that feedback provision can result in quality improvement at the expense of or for the benefit of nurses' well-being. To better understand these contradictory effects, research should examine nurses' perceptions of feedback as mediating variables, while incorporating context factors as moderating variables. Nursing management can use feedback on quality measurements to nursing teams, as a tool for enhanced quality and as a motivating tool. However, nurses' perceptions and contextual variables are important for the actual success of feedback.