Michael O. Wood
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Michael O. Wood has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Jason Thistlethwaite
University of Waterloo
2 shared publications- Jason Thistlethwaite
School of Environment, Enterprise and Development, University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada
1 shared publication - Jason Thistlethwaite
University of Waterloo
1 shared publication - Scott R. Colwell
University of Guelph
1 shared publication - Theodore J. Noseworthy
Department of Marketing and Consumer Studies at the University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-23
Social License to Operate (SLO): Case Review of Enbridge and the Northern Gateway Pipeline
- 25 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-23
Social License to Operate (SLO): Case Review of Enbridge and the Northern Gateway Pipeline
- 20 June 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 579-601
Social License to Operate (SLO)
- 15 April 2018
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Management
- Vol. 29 (2) , 279-298
Insurance and Climate Change Risk Management: Rescaling to Look Beyond the Horizon
Climate change represents a significant financial risk to the insurance industry, but research has yet to assess whether the industry is managing this risk. Through the application of scale as a vertically nested hierarchy of relationships, this paper seeks to evaluate whether insurers are ‘rescaling’ risk management practices to accommodate the temporal and spatial uncertainty associated with climate change. This framework is applied to a content analysis of 178 (183) firm responses to the 2012 (2015) U.S. National Association of Insurance Commissioners Climate Risk Disclosure Survey to detect evidence of rescaling through climate change risk management (CCRM). The results reveal that the majority of companies do not integrate climate change into their risk management practices, but reinsurers are rescaling in a greater proportion than primary insurers. This finding confirms that a nested spatial and temporal scale in the insurance industry creates resistance to CCRM. The use of scale contributes to emerging scholarship on organizations and climate change by offering a framework for measuring organizational responses and justifying a research agenda on rescaling strategies as a means of risk management.
- 15 April 2018
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Management
- Vol. 29 (2) , 279-298
Insurance and Climate Change Risk Management: Rescaling to Look Beyond the Horizon
Climate change represents a significant financial risk to the insurance industry, but research has yet to assess whether the industry is managing this risk. Through the application of scale as a vertically nested hierarchy of relationships, this paper seeks to evaluate whether insurers are ‘rescaling’ risk management practices to accommodate the temporal and spatial uncertainty associated with climate change. This framework is applied to a content analysis of 178 (183) firm responses to the 2012 (2015) U.S. National Association of Insurance Commissioners Climate Risk Disclosure Survey to detect evidence of rescaling through climate change risk management (CCRM). The results reveal that the majority of companies do not integrate climate change into their risk management practices, but reinsurers are rescaling in a greater proportion than primary insurers. This finding confirms that a nested spatial and temporal scale in the insurance industry creates resistance to CCRM. The use of scale contributes to emerging scholarship on organizations and climate change by offering a framework for measuring organizational responses and justifying a research agenda on rescaling strategies as a means of risk management.
- Open Access
- 5 February 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-23
Social License to Operate (SLO): Case Review of Enbridge and the Northern Gateway Pipeline
- 5 February 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-23
Open AccessSocial License to Operate (SLO): Case Review of Enbridge and the Northern Gateway Pipeline
- 28 December 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 118 (3) , 515-527
If You Can’t See the Forest for the Trees, You Might Just Cut Down the Forest: The Perils of Forced Choice on “Seemingly” Unethical Decision-Making
- 28 December 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 118 (3) , 515-527
If You Can’t See the Forest for the Trees, You Might Just Cut Down the Forest: The Perils of Forced Choice on “Seemingly” Unethical Decision-Making