Wiard Jorritsma
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Wiard Jorritsma has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Peter Martinus Adranius van Ooijen
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
6 shared publications - Fokie Cnossen
University of Groningen
5 shared publications - Matthijs Oudkerk
Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, the Netherlands; Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
2 shared publications Rudi A. Dierckx
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Dept. Radiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Dept. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
2 shared publicationsJonatan T. Prins
Center for Medical Imaging North East Netherlands, Groningen, the Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Vol. 85 (1) , 36-42
Pattern mining of user interaction logs for a post-deployment usability evaluation of a radiology PACS client
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Vol. 85 (1) , 36-42
Pattern mining of user interaction logs for a post-deployment usability evaluation of a radiology PACS client
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Vol. 85 (1) , 28-35
Post-deployment usability evaluation of a radiology workstation
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Vol. 85 (1) , 28-35
Post-deployment usability evaluation of a radiology workstation
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Vol. 77, 1-9
Adaptive support for user interface customization: a study in radiology
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Vol. 77, 1-9
Adaptive support for user interface customization: a study in radiology
- 15 April 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Vol. 31 (6) , 440-450
Comparing four touch-based interaction techniques for an image-based audience response system
This study aimed to determine the most appropriate touch-based interaction technique for I2Vote, an image-based audience response system for radiology education in which users need to accurately mark a target on a medical image. Four plausible techniques were identified: land-on, take-off, zoom-pointing, and shift. The techniques were implemented in such a way that they could be used on any modern device. An empirical study was performed in which users marked a target on an image using all four techniques on either a smartphone or a tablet. The techniques were compared in terms of accuracy, efficiency, ease of use, intuitiveness, and compatibility with the different devices. The results showed that shift was the most accurate technique, but it was hampered by its high complexity and low intuitiveness. Land-on was the fastest technique but also the least accurate. Take-off and zoom-pointing provided the best trade-off between accuracy, efficiency, ease of use, and intuitiveness. We therefore conclude that both take-off and zoom-pointing are viable interaction techniques for I2Vote.
- 15 April 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Vol. 31 (6) , 440-450
Comparing four touch-based interaction techniques for an image-based audience response system
This study aimed to determine the most appropriate touch-based interaction technique for I2Vote, an image-based audience response system for radiology education in which users need to accurately mark a target on a medical image. Four plausible techniques were identified: land-on, take-off, zoom-pointing, and shift. The techniques were implemented in such a way that they could be used on any modern device. An empirical study was performed in which users marked a target on an image using all four techniques on either a smartphone or a tablet. The techniques were compared in terms of accuracy, efficiency, ease of use, intuitiveness, and compatibility with the different devices. The results showed that shift was the most accurate technique, but it was hampered by its high complexity and low intuitiveness. Land-on was the fastest technique but also the least accurate. Take-off and zoom-pointing provided the best trade-off between accuracy, efficiency, ease of use, and intuitiveness. We therefore conclude that both take-off and zoom-pointing are viable interaction techniques for I2Vote.
- 1 February 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 70 (2) , 115-122
Improving the radiologist–CAD interaction: designing for appropriate trust
- 1 February 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 70 (2) , 115-122
Improving the radiologist–CAD interaction: designing for appropriate trust
- 1 January 2014
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Vol. 83 (1) , 27-36
Merits of usability testing for PACS selection
- 1 January 2014
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Vol. 83 (1) , 27-36
Merits of usability testing for PACS selection