JMJaime Mungia

Jaime Mungia

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Jaime Mungia has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Case Study: Experience Applying and Tracking a Quality Improvement Approach for Maternal and Newborn Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa

    by Barbara Rawlins, Young-Mi Kim, Jaime Haver, Aleisha Rozario, Adrienne Kols, Hillary Chiguvare, Matias Anjos, Emmanuel Otolorin, Jacqueline Aribot

    The Standards-Based Management and Recognition (SBM-R(®)) approach to quality improvement was applied to maternal and newborn health services in Guinea, Mozambique, Nigeria and Zimbabwe. In every country, the quality of service delivery, as measured by clinical performance standards, improved following the intervention. The performance of evidence-based service delivery practices, as measured through service statistics, also increased and institutional rates of postpartum hemorrhage and very early neonatal deaths exhibited declining trends. Findings suggest that the effects of SBM-R reach beyond service delivery processes to health outputs and outcomes and demonstrate the potential returns of investing in quality improvement approaches.


  • Open Access

    Availability and distribution of human resources for provision of comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional study

    by Manizha Faqir, Partamin Zainullah, Hannah Tappis, Jaime Mungia, Sheena Currie, Young Mi Kim

    For over a decade, Afghanistan’s Ministry of Public Health and its international development partners have invested in strengthening the national health workforce and establishing a system of primary health care facilities and hospitals to reduce the high levels of maternal and child mortality that were documented shortly after the fall of the Taliban in 2001. Significant progress has been made, but many challenges remain. The objective of this study is to assess the availability and distribution of human resources for round-the-clock comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care service provision in secure areas of Afghanistan in order to inform policy and program planning. A cross-sectional assessment was conducted from December 2009 to February 2010 at the 78 accessible facilities designated to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care in Afghanistan. The availability of staff on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week; involvement of staff in essential clinical functions; turnover rates; and vacancies were documented at each facility. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results. All facilities assessed had at least one midwife on staff, but most did not meet the minimum staffing requirements set in national guidelines. Given that all facilities assessed are considered referral centers for lower-level clinics, the lack of doctors at 5% of facilities, lack of anesthetists at 10% of facilities and lack of obstetrician/gynecologists at 51% of facilities raises serious concerns about the capacity of the health system to respond with lifesaving care for women with obstetric complications. While the government continues its efforts to increase the number of qualified female health professionals in Afghanistan after decades with little female education, innovative strategies are needed to facilitate deployment, skill-development and retention of female healthcare providers in underserved areas.


  • Open Access

    Assessing post-abortion care in health facilities in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional study

    by Nasratullah Ansari, Partamin Zainullah, Young Mi Kim, Hannah Tappis, Adrienne Kols, Sheena Currie, Jaime Haver, Jos van Roosmalen, Jacqueline Ew Broerse, Jelle Stekelenburg

    Complications of abortion are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide, along with hemorrhage, sepsis, and hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. In Afghanistan little data exist on the capacity of the health system to provide post-abortion care (PAC). This paper presents findings from a national emergency obstetric and neonatal care needs assessment related to PAC, with the aim of providing insight into the current situation and recommendations for improvement of PAC services. A national Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Needs Assessment was conducted from December 2009 through February 2010 at 78 of the 127 facilities designated to provide emergency obstetric and neonatal care services in Afghanistan. Research tools were adapted from the Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program Needs Assessment Toolkit and national midwifery education assessment tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize facility characteristics, and linear regression models were used to assess the factors associated with providers’ PAC knowledge and skills. The average number of women receiving PAC in the past year in each facility was 244, with no significant difference across facility types. All facilities had at least one staff member who provided PAC services. Overall, 70% of providers reported having been trained in PAC and 68% felt confident in their ability to perform these services. On average, providers were able to identify 66% of the most common complications of unsafe or incomplete abortion and 57% of the steps to take in examining and managing women with these complications. Providers correctly demonstrated an average of 31% of the tasks required for PAC during a simulated procedure. Training was significantly associated with PAC knowledge and skills in multivariate regression models, but other provider and facility characteristics were not. While designated emergency obstetric facilities in Afghanistan generally have most supplies and equipment for PAC, the capacity of healthcare providers to deliver PAC is limited. Therefore, we strongly recommend training all skilled birth attendants in PAC services. In addition, a PAC training package should be integrated into pre-service medical education.


  • Establishing midwifery in low-resource settings: Guidance from a mixed-methods evaluation of the Afghanistan midwifery education program

    by Partamin Zainullah, Nasratullah Ansari, Khalid Yari, Mahmood Azimi, Sabera Turkmani, Pashtoon Azfar, Amnesty LeFevre, Jaime Mungia, Rehana Gubin, Young-Mi Kim, et al.