Larry C. Deeb
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Larry C. Deeb has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Georgeanna J. Klingensmith
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
1 shared publication Holly C. Schachner
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diabetes Care, Tarrytown, New York
1 shared publicationJane Wallace
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diabetes Care, Tarrytown, New York
1 shared publicationJoan L. Parkes
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diabetes Care, Tarrytown, New York
1 shared publication- Magnus Ekelund
Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
1 shared publication - Margarita A. Kovarenko
Siberian State Medical University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 July 2018
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Diabetes
- Vol. 19 (7) , 1263-1270
Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial
Background Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a fixed soluble co‐formulation of basal and bolus insulin. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of IDegAsp in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects Children and adolescents (aged 1–95%CI (–0.45 mmol/mol [–2.51; 1.60]95%CI), confirming non‐inferiority. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in fasting or self‐measured plasma glucose. Confirmed hypoglycemia rates did not significantly differ between groups. There was a significant reduction in basal and total insulin dose with IDegAsp+IAsp versus IDet+IAsp (post hoc analysis). Mean number of injections/day was 3.6 and 4.9 with IDegAsp+IAsp and IDet+IAsp, respectively (post hoc analysis). A non‐significant higher rate of severe hypoglycemia was observed with IDegAsp+IAsp versus IDet+IAsp. The most frequent adverse events in both groups were hypoglycemia, headache and nasopharyngitis. Conclusions IDegAsp+IAsp was non‐inferior to IDet+IAsp regarding HbA1c, had similar hypoglycemia rates and required fewer injections.
- 16 July 2018
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Diabetes
- Vol. 19 (7) , 1263-1270
Open AccessEfficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial
Background Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a fixed soluble co‐formulation of basal and bolus insulin. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of IDegAsp in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects Children and adolescents (aged 1–95%CI (–0.45 mmol/mol [–2.51; 1.60]95%CI), confirming non‐inferiority. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in fasting or self‐measured plasma glucose. Confirmed hypoglycemia rates did not significantly differ between groups. There was a significant reduction in basal and total insulin dose with IDegAsp+IAsp versus IDet+IAsp (post hoc analysis). Mean number of injections/day was 3.6 and 4.9 with IDegAsp+IAsp and IDet+IAsp, respectively (post hoc analysis). A non‐significant higher rate of severe hypoglycemia was observed with IDegAsp+IAsp versus IDet+IAsp. The most frequent adverse events in both groups were hypoglycemia, headache and nasopharyngitis. Conclusions IDegAsp+IAsp was non‐inferior to IDet+IAsp regarding HbA1c, had similar hypoglycemia rates and required fewer injections.
- Open Access
- 1 September 2011
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Vol. 5 (5) , 1157-1163
Performance of the DIDGET Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Children, Teens, and Young Adults
Background: This study evaluated the performance of the DIDGET® blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) in the hands of its intended users: Children, teens, and young adults with diabetes. Methods: Finger stick capillary blood samples were tested in duplicate by subjects (with parent/guardian assistance, if needed) and health care professionals using the DIDGET BGMS, and results were compared with those obtained using a Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) glucose analyzer. Modified venous blood samples (i.e., glycolyzed or spiked with glucose) were used to analyze meter performance under extreme glucose concentrations. Accuracy was assessed using International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197:2003 guidelines (i.e., 95% of meter results within ±15 mg/dl or ±20% of reference values). Results: A total of 123 subjects aged 4 to 24 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled. The DIDGET meter achieved accuracy according to ISO 15197:2003 criteria: >97% of meter results were within ±15 mg/dl or ±20% of reference values. Regression analyses showed a high degree of correlation between meter and YSI results: Coefficient of determination ( R2) = 98.2% for all samples combined and 97.2% for capillary samples only. Clinical accuracy for combined samples was demonstrated by Parkes consensus error grid analyses; 100% of meter results were in zone A (98.5%) or zone B (1.5%). There was no difference in performance or accuracy across age subsets. Hematocrit values did not affect meter blood glucose results. Conclusion: The DIDGET BGMS provided accurate test results across all age ranges in children, teens, and young adults with diabetes.
- 1 September 2011
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Vol. 5 (5) , 1157-1163
Open AccessPerformance of the DIDGET Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Children, Teens, and Young Adults
Background: This study evaluated the performance of the DIDGET® blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) in the hands of its intended users: Children, teens, and young adults with diabetes. Methods: Finger stick capillary blood samples were tested in duplicate by subjects (with parent/guardian assistance, if needed) and health care professionals using the DIDGET BGMS, and results were compared with those obtained using a Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) glucose analyzer. Modified venous blood samples (i.e., glycolyzed or spiked with glucose) were used to analyze meter performance under extreme glucose concentrations. Accuracy was assessed using International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197:2003 guidelines (i.e., 95% of meter results within ±15 mg/dl or ±20% of reference values). Results: A total of 123 subjects aged 4 to 24 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled. The DIDGET meter achieved accuracy according to ISO 15197:2003 criteria: >97% of meter results were within ±15 mg/dl or ±20% of reference values. Regression analyses showed a high degree of correlation between meter and YSI results: Coefficient of determination ( R2) = 98.2% for all samples combined and 97.2% for capillary samples only. Clinical accuracy for combined samples was demonstrated by Parkes consensus error grid analyses; 100% of meter results were in zone A (98.5%) or zone B (1.5%). There was no difference in performance or accuracy across age subsets. Hematocrit values did not affect meter blood glucose results. Conclusion: The DIDGET BGMS provided accurate test results across all age ranges in children, teens, and young adults with diabetes.