Inmaculada De La Torre
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Inmaculada De La Torre has a total of 28 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Diana Hernández-Flórez
Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
3 shared publications - Lara Valor
Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
3 shared publications - Esperanza Naredo
Department of Rheumatology, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital
2 shared publications - José Rosas
J. Rosas Gómez de Salazar, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario de la Marina Baixa, Vila Joiosa (Alicante), Spain
2 shared publications Juan Carlos Nieto
Rheumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maraňón, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publicationsLara Valor
Rheumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maraňón, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 September 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Reumatología Clínica
- Vol. 12 (5) , 300-301
Impacto del grosor del tejido celular subcutáneo en el sitio de la inyección medido por ecografía sobre la respuesta terapéutica a fármacos antifactor de necrosis tumoral subcutáneos
- 1 September 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Reumatología Clínica
- Vol. 12 (5) , 300-301
Impacto del grosor del tejido celular subcutáneo en el sitio de la inyección medido por ecografía sobre la respuesta terapéutica a fármacos antifactor de necrosis tumoral subcutáneos
- 27 August 2015
- Vol. 33 (5) , 617-23
Agreement in assessment of infliximab and adalimumab levels in rheumatoid arthritis: interlaboratory and interassay comparison.
Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are assessed using a variety of techniques, therefore, results cannot accurately be compared for clinical purposes. The aim of this study was to test two infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) ELISA versions, for drug levels and ADA, to see whether they yield similar results. ELISA versions [Promonitor® IFX R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® IFX and Anti-IFX (V.2); Promonitor® ADL R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® ADL and Anti-ADL (V.2) kits (Progenika Biopharma, Spain)] were used to measure drug levels and ADA in IFX (n=24) and ADL (n=24) rheumatoid arthritis-treated patients in three independent laboratories. Quantitative and qualitative agreements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cohen's Kappa (κ) respectively. The Bland-Altman plots assessed differences between V.1 and V.2. Interlaboratory agreement (ICC/κ) with V.1 was poor for IFX (0.66/0.62) and ADL (0.69/0.52) drug levels; meanwhile, high agreement was found with V.2 for IFX (0.98/0.95) and ADL (0.094/1.00). Comparison between V.1 and V.2 in each laboratory resulted in systematically higher values in V.2 than in V.1 and poor agreement (ICC/κ ranges) for IFX (0.12-0.7/ 0.19-0.42) and ADL (0.69-0.89 /0.50-0.73). Qualitative measurements result in better agreement, as evidenced in our study. Greater agreement in V.2 compared with V.1 for IFX and ADL levels could be due to a better tune up. Further studies are required to standardise methods to establish therapeutic reference ranges.
- 27 August 2015
- Vol. 33 (5) , 617-23
Agreement in assessment of infliximab and adalimumab levels in rheumatoid arthritis: interlaboratory and interassay comparison.
Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are assessed using a variety of techniques, therefore, results cannot accurately be compared for clinical purposes. The aim of this study was to test two infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) ELISA versions, for drug levels and ADA, to see whether they yield similar results. ELISA versions [Promonitor® IFX R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® IFX and Anti-IFX (V.2); Promonitor® ADL R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® ADL and Anti-ADL (V.2) kits (Progenika Biopharma, Spain)] were used to measure drug levels and ADA in IFX (n=24) and ADL (n=24) rheumatoid arthritis-treated patients in three independent laboratories. Quantitative and qualitative agreements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cohen's Kappa (κ) respectively. The Bland-Altman plots assessed differences between V.1 and V.2. Interlaboratory agreement (ICC/κ) with V.1 was poor for IFX (0.66/0.62) and ADL (0.69/0.52) drug levels; meanwhile, high agreement was found with V.2 for IFX (0.98/0.95) and ADL (0.094/1.00). Comparison between V.1 and V.2 in each laboratory resulted in systematically higher values in V.2 than in V.1 and poor agreement (ICC/κ ranges) for IFX (0.12-0.7/ 0.19-0.42) and ADL (0.69-0.89 /0.50-0.73). Qualitative measurements result in better agreement, as evidenced in our study. Greater agreement in V.2 compared with V.1 for IFX and ADL levels could be due to a better tune up. Further studies are required to standardise methods to establish therapeutic reference ranges.
- 20 October 2014
- Vol. 32 (6) , 942-8
Clinical relevance of monitoring serum levels of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice.
The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of measuring serum levels of adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with ADL for at least 3 months in daily practice. All patients received concomitant disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain the cut-off value of ADL for low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤3.2). Anti-ADL antibodies were detected in 4 (7%) patients with a mean (SD) DAS28 score of 4.6 (0.9). Patients with positive anti-ADL antibodies had significantly lower levels of ADL and higher DAS28 scores than those with negative antibodies. Patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 as compared with patients with DAS28 >3.2 showed significantly better SDAI score, higher serum concentrations of ADL and none of them showed anti-ADL antibodies. The cut-off of serum level of ADL for DAS28 11.3 mg/L. Patients in the medium group were closed to clinical remission (median DAS28 2.7) and patients in the high group were on clinical remission (DAS28 2.1). Serum levels of ADL should be maintained >4.3 mg/L. In patients with ADL levels >11.3 mg/L, a decrease of the dose of ADL or an increase in the interval between doses may be planned. The presence of anti-ADL antibodies was associated with a loss of clinical efficacy of ADL.
- 20 October 2014
- Vol. 32 (6) , 942-8
Clinical relevance of monitoring serum levels of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice.
The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of measuring serum levels of adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with ADL for at least 3 months in daily practice. All patients received concomitant disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain the cut-off value of ADL for low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤3.2). Anti-ADL antibodies were detected in 4 (7%) patients with a mean (SD) DAS28 score of 4.6 (0.9). Patients with positive anti-ADL antibodies had significantly lower levels of ADL and higher DAS28 scores than those with negative antibodies. Patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 as compared with patients with DAS28 >3.2 showed significantly better SDAI score, higher serum concentrations of ADL and none of them showed anti-ADL antibodies. The cut-off of serum level of ADL for DAS28 11.3 mg/L. Patients in the medium group were closed to clinical remission (median DAS28 2.7) and patients in the high group were on clinical remission (DAS28 2.1). Serum levels of ADL should be maintained >4.3 mg/L. In patients with ADL levels >11.3 mg/L, a decrease of the dose of ADL or an increase in the interval between doses may be planned. The presence of anti-ADL antibodies was associated with a loss of clinical efficacy of ADL.
- 1 March 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Reumatología Clínica
- Vol. 10 (2) , 101-104
Minimum Effective Dosages of Anti-TNF in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Study
- 1 March 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Reumatología Clínica
- Vol. 10 (2) , 101-104
Minimum Effective Dosages of Anti-TNF in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Study
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Vol. 13 (3) , 407-414
Anti-TNF treatments in rheumatoid arthritis: economic impact of dosage modification
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic disease that leads to increases in health system economic burden through direct and indirect costs, including chronic treatment, reduced productivity and premature mortality. Anti-TNF agents have represented a major advance in the treatment of RA. The most commonly used (adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab) have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness at label doses. However, physicians may need to adapt the treatment by increasing the dose when a drug is not effective enough or by reducing it when there is a sustained effectiveness. In a cross-sectional study conducted in our hospital in which information from RA patients treated with anti-TNF drugs under conventional and modified doses were collected, the authors analyzed the costs of the medication in order to estimate the mean patient-year cost, the annual costs related to clinical efficacy and the cost per responder patient to anti-TNF treatment when dosage modification is undertaken in daily clinical practice.
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Vol. 13 (3) , 407-414
Anti-TNF treatments in rheumatoid arthritis: economic impact of dosage modification
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic disease that leads to increases in health system economic burden through direct and indirect costs, including chronic treatment, reduced productivity and premature mortality. Anti-TNF agents have represented a major advance in the treatment of RA. The most commonly used (adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab) have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness at label doses. However, physicians may need to adapt the treatment by increasing the dose when a drug is not effective enough or by reducing it when there is a sustained effectiveness. In a cross-sectional study conducted in our hospital in which information from RA patients treated with anti-TNF drugs under conventional and modified doses were collected, the authors analyzed the costs of the medication in order to estimate the mean patient-year cost, the annual costs related to clinical efficacy and the cost per responder patient to anti-TNF treatment when dosage modification is undertaken in daily clinical practice.
- 29 August 2012
- Vol. 30 (4) , 554-60
Baseline serum immunoglobulin levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: relationships with clinical parameters and with B-cell dynamics following rituximab.
To investigate whether levels of serum immunoglobulins (sIgs) at baseline were associated with clinical parameters or B-cell dynamics following rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Baseline Ig levels, C-reactive protein (CRP), DAS28 and CD19+ve B-cell count (baseline, 1, 3 and 5 months) in 112 patients with RA after 1 cycle of RTX were included. All showed adequate B-cell depletion (<5 CD19+B cells/μl) after 1 month. Normal sIg ranges were for IgA (0.7-4.0 g/L), IgG (7.0-16.0 g/L), and IgM (0.4-2.3 g/L). Baseline IgA levels were raised in 29 patients, IgG in 18 and IgM in 11. CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with raised IgA and IgG compared to patients with normal levels (p=0.0002; p=0.03). At nadir after RTX, median levels of all sIgs decreased significantly although 16 patients (55%) remained with raised IgA, 28% IgG (5/18) and 27% IgM (3/11). Patients with raised IgA had higher minimum levels reached of CRP and of DAS28 (p=0.002; p=05). After 5 months, a higher percentage of patients with raised baseline sIgA had repopulated and were found to have shorter clinical responses than those with sIgs within normal limits. sIgA levels in RA patients remained raised in a higher proportion of patients than other sIg after RTX. Raised sIgA was associated with a less robust clinical response to RTX and with B-cell repopulation coincident with relapse. Expanded or more permissive microenvironments for long-lived IgA plasma cells may be related to the presence of disease more refractive to B-cell depletion therapy.
- 29 August 2012
- Vol. 30 (4) , 554-60
Baseline serum immunoglobulin levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: relationships with clinical parameters and with B-cell dynamics following rituximab.
To investigate whether levels of serum immunoglobulins (sIgs) at baseline were associated with clinical parameters or B-cell dynamics following rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Baseline Ig levels, C-reactive protein (CRP), DAS28 and CD19+ve B-cell count (baseline, 1, 3 and 5 months) in 112 patients with RA after 1 cycle of RTX were included. All showed adequate B-cell depletion (<5 CD19+B cells/μl) after 1 month. Normal sIg ranges were for IgA (0.7-4.0 g/L), IgG (7.0-16.0 g/L), and IgM (0.4-2.3 g/L). Baseline IgA levels were raised in 29 patients, IgG in 18 and IgM in 11. CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with raised IgA and IgG compared to patients with normal levels (p=0.0002; p=0.03). At nadir after RTX, median levels of all sIgs decreased significantly although 16 patients (55%) remained with raised IgA, 28% IgG (5/18) and 27% IgM (3/11). Patients with raised IgA had higher minimum levels reached of CRP and of DAS28 (p=0.002; p=05). After 5 months, a higher percentage of patients with raised baseline sIgA had repopulated and were found to have shorter clinical responses than those with sIgs within normal limits. sIgA levels in RA patients remained raised in a higher proportion of patients than other sIg after RTX. Raised sIgA was associated with a less robust clinical response to RTX and with B-cell repopulation coincident with relapse. Expanded or more permissive microenvironments for long-lived IgA plasma cells may be related to the presence of disease more refractive to B-cell depletion therapy.