J. Konadu Fokuo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
J. Konadu Fokuo has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Patrick W. Corrigan
Illinois Institute of Technology
2 shared publications - Carla Kocurek
Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA
1 shared publication Carla Kundert
Illinois Institute of Technology, 3424 S. State Street, Chicago, IL, 60616, USA
1 shared publicationCarol Wahlstrom
Northern Illinois University, 1240 Normal Rd., Dekalb, IL, 60115, USA
1 shared publication- Carol Wahlstrom
Northern Illinois University, 1240 Normal Rd., Dekalb, IL, 60115, USA
1 shared publication Jeanette Rossetti
Northern Illinois University, 1240 Normal Rd., Dekalb, IL, 60115, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 July 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 53 (8) , 1007
Erratum to: Decreasing the Stigma of Mental Illness Through a Student-Nurse Mentoring Program: A Qualitative Study
- 25 July 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 53 (8) , 1007
Erratum to: Decreasing the Stigma of Mental Illness Through a Student-Nurse Mentoring Program: A Qualitative Study
- 1 June 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 53 (3) , 257-265
Decreasing the Stigma of Mental Illness Through a Student-Nurse Mentoring Program: A Qualitative Study
Stigma is defined as endorsing prejudicial attitudes about mental illness leading to discriminatory behaviors. It undermines the quality of medical care received by people with mental illness. Research suggests contact based interventions are effective in reducing stigma and increasing positive attitudes towards people with mental illness. This paper describes the development of a consumer led student-nurse mentoring program as part of nursing student education. People with lived mental health experience would mentor student nurses regarding the harmful effects of stigma and the beneficial outcomes of affirming attitudes. Seventy members of stakeholder groups (people with lived mental health experience and student nurses) participated in focus groups. Qualitative analyses revealed themes across stakeholder groups regarding: perceived mental health stigma from nurses, ways to reduce stigma, target message for the mentorship program, characteristics of mentors and logistics in developing such a program within the student nurse curricula.
- 1 June 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 53 (3) , 257-265
Decreasing the Stigma of Mental Illness Through a Student-Nurse Mentoring Program: A Qualitative Study
Stigma is defined as endorsing prejudicial attitudes about mental illness leading to discriminatory behaviors. It undermines the quality of medical care received by people with mental illness. Research suggests contact based interventions are effective in reducing stigma and increasing positive attitudes towards people with mental illness. This paper describes the development of a consumer led student-nurse mentoring program as part of nursing student education. People with lived mental health experience would mentor student nurses regarding the harmful effects of stigma and the beneficial outcomes of affirming attitudes. Seventy members of stakeholder groups (people with lived mental health experience and student nurses) participated in focus groups. Qualitative analyses revealed themes across stakeholder groups regarding: perceived mental health stigma from nurses, ways to reduce stigma, target message for the mentorship program, characteristics of mentors and logistics in developing such a program within the student nurse curricula.
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 50 (7) , 792-799
How Does Direct to Consumer Advertising Affect the Stigma of Mental Illness?
Stigma interferes with life goals of people with mental illness. Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) may impact stigmatizing attitudes. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of psychiatric medication DTCA on the stigmatizing and affirming attitudes of the general population versus individuals self-identified with mental illness. Participants (n = 272) were randomly assigned to watch a DTCA about Cymbalta, an antidepressant, embedded in two other advertisements for non-pharmaceutical products. Participants completed measures of stigmatizing and affirming attitudes before and after viewing this DTCA. Results indicate that the Cymbalta DTCA worsened the attitudes of the general public. These participants were less likely to offer help, endorse recovery, and agree with self-determination attitudes towards people with mental illness following viewing the DTCA. The self-identified group reported less blame, less dangerousness, less social avoidance, more pity, and greater willingness to help after viewing the DTCA. Moreover, there was significant improvement in their endorsement of recovery. Results suggest that DTCAs about psychiatric medication may increase the public’s stigma towards people with mental illness but reduce stigma among individuals who identify as having a mental illness. Findings are somewhat limited by selection biases and self-report. Implications for further development of DTCAs are considered.
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 50 (7) , 792-799
How Does Direct to Consumer Advertising Affect the Stigma of Mental Illness?
Stigma interferes with life goals of people with mental illness. Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) may impact stigmatizing attitudes. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of psychiatric medication DTCA on the stigmatizing and affirming attitudes of the general population versus individuals self-identified with mental illness. Participants (n = 272) were randomly assigned to watch a DTCA about Cymbalta, an antidepressant, embedded in two other advertisements for non-pharmaceutical products. Participants completed measures of stigmatizing and affirming attitudes before and after viewing this DTCA. Results indicate that the Cymbalta DTCA worsened the attitudes of the general public. These participants were less likely to offer help, endorse recovery, and agree with self-determination attitudes towards people with mental illness following viewing the DTCA. The self-identified group reported less blame, less dangerousness, less social avoidance, more pity, and greater willingness to help after viewing the DTCA. Moreover, there was significant improvement in their endorsement of recovery. Results suggest that DTCAs about psychiatric medication may increase the public’s stigma towards people with mental illness but reduce stigma among individuals who identify as having a mental illness. Findings are somewhat limited by selection biases and self-report. Implications for further development of DTCAs are considered.