CCCharles C. J. Carpenter

Charles C. J. Carpenter

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Charles C. J. Carpenter has a total of 28 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Killed Vaccines: Cholera, Typhoid, and Plague

    by Charles C. J. Carpenter, Richard B. Hornick


  • Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Infection in 1998

    by Charles C. J. Carpenter, Margaret A. Fischl, Scott M. Hammer, Martin S. Hirsch, Donna M. Jacobsen, David A. Katzenstein, Julio S. G. Montaner, Douglas D. Richman, Michael S. Saag, Robert T. Schooley, et al.

    Objective.—To provide recommendations for antiretroviral therapy based on information available in mid-1998.Participants.—An international panel of physicians with expertise in antiretroviral research and care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, first convened by the International AIDS Society–USA in December 1995.Evidence.—The panel reviewed available clinical and basic science study results (including phase 3 controlled trials; clinical, virologic, and immunologic end point data; data presented at research conferences; and studies of HIV pathophysiology); opinions of panel members were also considered. Recommendations were limited to drugs available in mid-1998.Consensus Process.—Panel members monitor new clinical research reports and interim results. The full panel meets regularly to discuss how the new information may change treatment recommendations. Updated recommendations are developed through consensus of the entire panel at each stage of development.Conclusions.—Accumulating data from clinical and pathogenesis studies continue to support early institution of potent antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. A variety of combination regimens show potency, expanding choices for initial regimens for individual patients. Plasma HIV RNA assays with increased sensitivity are important in monitoring therapeutic response; however, more data are needed to determine precisely the HIV RNA levels that define treatment failure. Long-term adverse drug effects are beginning to emerge, requiring ongoing attention. Some issues regarding optimal long-term approaches to antiretroviral management are unresolved. The increased complexity in HIV management requires ongoing monitoring of new data for optimal treatment of HIV infection.


    • 25 June 1997
      • Vol. 277  (24) , 1962-9

    Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997. Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel.

    by C C Carpenter, M A Fischl, S M Hammer, M S Hirsch, D M Jacobsen, D A Katzenstein, J S Montaner, D D Richman, M S Saag, R T Schooley, et al.

    To provide current recommendations for antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. The original International AIDS Society-USA 13-member panel representing international expertise in antiretroviral research and care of patients with HIV infection. The following were considered: Newly available clinical and basic science study results, including phase 3 controlled trials; clinical, virological, and immunologic end-point data; interim analyses of studies presented at national and international research conferences; studies of HIV pathophysiology; and expert opinions of panel members. Recommendations were limited to the drugs available in mid 1997. The full panel met on a regular basis (July 1996, September 1996, November 1996, January 1997, and April 1997) since the publication of its initial recommendations in mid 1996 to review new research reports and interim results. The panel discussed whether and how new information changed its initial recommendations. The recommendations contained herein were determined by group consensus. New data have provided a stronger rationale for earlier initiation of more aggressive therapy than previously recommended and reinforce the importance of careful selection of initial drug regimen for each patient for optimal long-term clinical benefit and adherence. The plasma viral load is a crucial element of clinical management for assessing prognosis and the effectiveness of therapy, and such testing must be done properly. Treatment failure is most readily indicated by a rising plasma HIV RNA level and should be confirmed prior to a change of treatment. Therapeutic approaches must be updated as new data, particularly on the long-term clinical effect of aggressive antiretroviral treatment, continue to emerge.


    • 10 July 1996
      • Vol. 276  (2) , 146-54

    Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996. Recommendations of an international panel. International AIDS Society-USA.

    by C C Carpenter, M A Fischl, S M Hammer, M S Hirsch, D M Jacobsen, D A Katzenstein, J S Montaner, D D Richman, M S Sáag, R T Schooley, et al.

    To provide clinical recommendations for antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease with currently (mid 1996) available drugs. When to start therapy, what to start with, when to change, and what to change to were addressed. A 13-member panel representing international expertise in antiretroviral research and HIV patient care was selected by the international AIDS Society-USA. Available clinical and basic science data, including phase 3 controlled trials, clinical endpoint data, virologic and immunologic endpoint data, interim analyses, studies of HIV pathophysiology, and expert opinions of panel members were considered. Recommendations were limited to drugs available in mid 1996. For each question posed, 1 or more member(s) reviewed and presented available data. Recommendations were determined by group consensus (January 1996); revisions as warranted by new data were incorporated by group consensus (February-May 1996). Recent data on HIV pathogenesis, methods to determine plasma HIV RNA, clinical trial data, and availability of new drugs point to the need for new approaches to treatment. Therapy is recommended based on CD4+ cell count, plasma HIV RNA level, or clinical status. Preferred initial drug regimens include nucleoside combinations; at present protease inhibitors are probably best reserved for patients at higher progression risk. For treatment failure or drug intolerance, subsequent regimen considerations include reasons for changing therapy, available drug options, disease stage, underlying conditions, and concomitant medication(s). Therapy for primary (acute) infection, high-risk exposures to HIV, and maternal-to-fetal transmission are also addressed. Therapeutic approaches need to be updated as new data continue to emerge.